Phase II double-blind, dose-ranging clinical evaluation of gadobenate dimeglumine in focal liver lesions: With analysis of liver and kidney signal change on early and delayed imaging

• Published in: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2000-06, Vol.11 (6), p.655-664
• Main Authors: Runge, Val M., Kenney, Charles M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: abnormalities; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis of Variance; contrast agents; Contrast Media; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Image Enhancement; liver; Liver - pathology; Liver Diseases - diagnosis; liver, abnormalities; liver, MR; magnetic resonance (MR); Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Meglumine - analogs & derivatives; Middle Aged; Organometallic Compounds; Probability; Sensitivity and Specificity; Time Factors
• ISSN: 1053-1807; 1522-2586
• DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200006)11:6<655::AID-JMRI12>3.0.CO;2-H

To evaluate the effect of contrast dose using gadobenate dimeglumine, 30 patients with focal liver lesions documented by computed tomography or ultrasound were studied by magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T. Patients received one of four doses of gadobenate dimeglumine (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mmol/kg) or saline. The order of dosage was randomized, with both the physician and patient blinded to the administered dose. Scans were obtained before, immediately following injection, and after 80 minutes of delay. Enhancement effects were quantified by region of interest measurements. Films were also reviewed in a randomized prospective fashion by an abdominal radiologist blinded to contrast dose and diagnosis. Higher doses led to a statistically significant improvement in enhancement of normal liver, both on immediate (P = 0.01 for the comparison of 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg immediately post‐contrast) and delayed scans (P = 0.003 for the same comparison). Liver‐lesion contrast‐to‐noise ratio also increased with dose, although results for most comparisons by dose were not statistically significant. Scans following gadobenate dimeglumine injection were judged to provide additional diagnostic confidence sufficient to affect patient management in 10 of 24 cases. In seven cases this information was provided by dynamic scans, in one case by delayed scans, and in two cases by both dynamic and delayed scans. In 2 of the 10 cases the dose was 0.025 mmol/kg, in 2 cases 0.05 mmol/kg, in 3 cases 0.1 mmol/kg, and in 3 cases 0.2 mmol/kg. Gadobenate dimeglumine is effective for imaging of focal liver lesions at a range of doses, with trends toward improved diagnostic information at higher doses. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;11:655–664. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.