Loading…
Evaluation of risk of splenosis during laparoscopic splenectomy in rat model
Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is an alternative to open surgery. However, there is a theoretic risk of splenosis and abdominal cavity dissemination of splenic cells if the splenic capsule is broken, as seen by experimental evidence of tumoral cell mobilization by the pneumoperitoneum. We evaluated t...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of surgery 2001-07, Vol.25 (7), p.882-885 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is an alternative to open surgery. However, there is a theoretic risk of splenosis and abdominal cavity dissemination of splenic cells if the splenic capsule is broken, as seen by experimental evidence of tumoral cell mobilization by the pneumoperitoneum. We evaluated the features of splenosis after splenectomy operated via an open approach or under laparoscopic control in an experimental model in the rat. A total of 65 Sprague‐Dawley rats were distributed in seven groups that included the open approach, CO2 pneumoperitoneum LS, or wall lift LS with or without a splenic graft. Splenic function was evaluated 90 day later through (1) scintigraphy with Tc‐labeled heat‐damaged erythrocytes; (2) determination of circulating “pitted” cells; and (3) analysis of the distribution of splenic pulp in the peritoneal cavity. Scintigraphy did not show viable residual tissue in any group after splenectomy; splenic activity in the splenic fossa was observed in 40% of the animals with grafts. Splenectomy increased the “pit” cell count, but it was reduced to normal values with a splenic graft. Necropsy showed normal splenic tissue in the splenic fossa in 100% of animals with a graft. Abdominal implants were observed significantly more frequently after CO2 LS than after the open surgery or a wall lift LS (80% vs. 20% vs. 30%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0364-2313 1432-2323 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00268-001-0045-0 |