Molecular Modeling and Substrate Specificity of Discrete Cruzipain-like and Cathepsin L-like Cysteine Proteinases of the Human Blood Fluke Schistosoma mansoni

• Published in: Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 2000-08, Vol.380 (1), p.46-55
• Main Authors: Brady, Ciaran P., Brinkworth, Ross I., Dalton, John P., Dowd, Andrew J., Verity, Christiana K., Brindley, Paul J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Amino Acids - chemistry; Animals; Catalysis; Cathepsin L; Cathepsins - metabolism; cruzipain; Cysteine Endopeptidases - chemistry; Cysteine Endopeptidases - metabolism; Endopeptidases; homology modeling; Kinetics; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; peptidase; Protein Binding; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Protozoan Proteins; Recombinant Proteins - chemistry; Schistosoma mansoni - enzymology; schistosome; Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; SmCL1; SmCL2; substrate; Substrate Specificity
• ISSN: 0003-9861; 1096-0384
• DOI: 10.1006/abbi.2000.1905

Adult Schistosoma mansoni blood flukes express two discrete cysteine proteinases, SmCL1 and SmCL2, both of which are related to the cathepsin L-like enzymes of the C1 family of peptidases. Our previous phylogenetic analysis indicated that SmCL1 is more closely related to cruzipain from the parasitic protozoa Trypanosoma cruzi than to human cathepsin L, whereas the converse situation applies with SmCL2. To characterize their catalytic subsites and substrate specificities, we have now developed three-dimensional (3D) homology models of SmCL1 and SmCL2 using the structure of cruzipain and cathepsin L. Eisenberg analysis of the 3D models revealed self-compatibility scores of 90.1 and 96.1 out of a possible score of 97.6 for SmCL1 and SmCL2, respectively, verifying the accuracy and utility of the models. Substrate preferences of recombinant SmCL1 and SmCL2 at positions P3, P2, and P1 conformed to the substrate specificity predicted by the models. In particular, SmCL1 and SmCL2 both exhibited high affinity (kcat/Km) for substrates with hydrophobic residues at P2 including Z-Leu-Arg-NHMec (773.4 and 548.5 mM−1 s−1, respectively), Boc-Val-Leu-Lys-NHMec (116.8 and 306.5 mM−1 s−1), and Z-Phe-Arg-NHMec (38.9 and 113.4 mM−1 s−1). SmCL1 exhibited only a low affinity for the cathepsin B diagnostic substrate Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec while SmCL2 failed to cleave this substrate. The substrate specificities of SmCL1 and SmCL2 were clearly differentiated with H-Leu-Val-Tyr-NHMec and Suc-Leu-Tyr-NHMec since SmCL1 cleaved both efficiently (kcat/Km values of 51.9 and 41.1 mM−1 s−1, respectively), whereas SmCL2 cleaved neither. The 3D models revealed that this difference in specificity was due to restrictions imposed on the S3 subsite of SmCL2 as a result of insertion of two amino acids vicinal to residue 60.