Loading…

Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications

Seventy‐four biopsy proven breast masses were imaged by color and power Doppler imaging to evaluate vascular pattern of malignant and benign breast masses. The images were analyzed for vascularity. The measurements were made over the entire mass as well as regionally at its core, at its periphery, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2000-07, Vol.19 (7), p.427-440
Main Authors: Sehgal, C. M, Arger, P. H, Rowling, S. E, Conant, E. F, Reynolds, C, Patton, J. A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5187-2c6ada7edc6d569b44328abdedb2bac8b1362793b1a5839e378674a345ec9d113
cites
container_end_page 440
container_issue 7
container_start_page 427
container_title Journal of ultrasound in medicine
container_volume 19
creator Sehgal, C. M
Arger, P. H
Rowling, S. E
Conant, E. F
Reynolds, C
Patton, J. A
description Seventy‐four biopsy proven breast masses were imaged by color and power Doppler imaging to evaluate vascular pattern of malignant and benign breast masses. The images were analyzed for vascularity. The measurements were made over the entire mass as well as regionally at its core, at its periphery, and in the tissue surrounding it. The surgical specimens were analyzed for microvessel density. The diagnostic performance of Doppler sonographic vascularity indices was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The malignant masses were 14 to 54% more vascular than the benign masses. Both types of masses were more vascular by ultrasonography than the tissue surrounding them. Whereas benign masses were 2.2 times more vascular than the surrounding tissue, the malignant masses were 5.0 times more vascular. In a subset of patients the regional vascularity at the core, periphery, and surrounding tissue by Doppler imaging exhibited a strong correlation (R2 > 0.9) with the corresponding histologic microvessel density measurements. Although the malignant masses exhibited a strong gradient in vascularity, core > periphery > surrounding tissue, the benign masses had relatively uniform distribution of vascularity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(Z)) for the Doppler indices ranged from 0.56 +/‐ 0.07 to 0.65 +/‐ 0.07. A nonlinear analysis including age‐specific values of Doppler indices improved the diagnostic performance to A(Z) = 0.85 +/‐ 0.06. In conclusion, quantitative Doppler imaging when used in combination with a nonlinear rule‐based approach has the potential for differentiating between malignant and benign masses.
doi_str_mv 10.7863/jum.2000.19.7.427
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71235587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71235587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5187-2c6ada7edc6d569b44328abdedb2bac8b1362793b1a5839e378674a345ec9d113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuP1SAYhonROGdGf4Abw0Jn18qlLWDcmPGeMcbEWZMPyukwoZeBdprz7-WkJ-rOFQk878fLA0IvKCmFbPibu6UvGSGkpKoUZcXEI7SjdU0K1VD-GO0IE7KomBJn6DylO0IYoaJ6is4okUoy1exQ_3OBYfYzzP7B4QdIdgkQ_XzA4x6b6CDNuIeUXMLmgD-M0xRcxL6Hzg_dWxxd58cBQk5Gn2eMQ8IwtLj10A1jmr3N7BS83c6eoSd7CMk9P60X6ObTx19XX4rrH5-_Xr2_LmxNpSiYbaAF4VrbtHWjTFVxJsG0rjXMgJWG8oYJxQ2FWnLleLYhKuBV7axqKeUX6HKbO8XxfnFp1r1P1oUAgxuXpAVlvK6lyCDdQBvHlKLb6ynmx8WDpkQfHevsWB8da6q00Nlxzrw8DV9M79p_EpvUDLw6AVknhH2Ewfr0l8s_UgmZsXcbtvrgDv-_WH-7-X7coEpsNV5v8Vvf3a4-Op16CCGXonpd1z91fwOmF6a1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71235587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Sehgal, C. M ; Arger, P. H ; Rowling, S. E ; Conant, E. F ; Reynolds, C ; Patton, J. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sehgal, C. M ; Arger, P. H ; Rowling, S. E ; Conant, E. F ; Reynolds, C ; Patton, J. A</creatorcontrib><description>Seventy‐four biopsy proven breast masses were imaged by color and power Doppler imaging to evaluate vascular pattern of malignant and benign breast masses. The images were analyzed for vascularity. The measurements were made over the entire mass as well as regionally at its core, at its periphery, and in the tissue surrounding it. The surgical specimens were analyzed for microvessel density. The diagnostic performance of Doppler sonographic vascularity indices was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The malignant masses were 14 to 54% more vascular than the benign masses. Both types of masses were more vascular by ultrasonography than the tissue surrounding them. Whereas benign masses were 2.2 times more vascular than the surrounding tissue, the malignant masses were 5.0 times more vascular. In a subset of patients the regional vascularity at the core, periphery, and surrounding tissue by Doppler imaging exhibited a strong correlation (R2 &gt; 0.9) with the corresponding histologic microvessel density measurements. Although the malignant masses exhibited a strong gradient in vascularity, core &gt; periphery &gt; surrounding tissue, the benign masses had relatively uniform distribution of vascularity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(Z)) for the Doppler indices ranged from 0.56 +/‐ 0.07 to 0.65 +/‐ 0.07. A nonlinear analysis including age‐specific values of Doppler indices improved the diagnostic performance to A(Z) = 0.85 +/‐ 0.06. In conclusion, quantitative Doppler imaging when used in combination with a nonlinear rule‐based approach has the potential for differentiating between malignant and benign masses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.7.427</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10898296</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JUMEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Laurel, MD: Am inst Ulrrasound Med</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Area Under Curve ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - blood supply ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Microcirculation ; Middle Aged ; Neovascularization, Pathologic ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2000-07, Vol.19 (7), p.427-440</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5187-2c6ada7edc6d569b44328abdedb2bac8b1362793b1a5839e378674a345ec9d113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1429478$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10898296$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sehgal, C. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arger, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowling, S. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conant, E. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, J. A</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>Seventy‐four biopsy proven breast masses were imaged by color and power Doppler imaging to evaluate vascular pattern of malignant and benign breast masses. The images were analyzed for vascularity. The measurements were made over the entire mass as well as regionally at its core, at its periphery, and in the tissue surrounding it. The surgical specimens were analyzed for microvessel density. The diagnostic performance of Doppler sonographic vascularity indices was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The malignant masses were 14 to 54% more vascular than the benign masses. Both types of masses were more vascular by ultrasonography than the tissue surrounding them. Whereas benign masses were 2.2 times more vascular than the surrounding tissue, the malignant masses were 5.0 times more vascular. In a subset of patients the regional vascularity at the core, periphery, and surrounding tissue by Doppler imaging exhibited a strong correlation (R2 &gt; 0.9) with the corresponding histologic microvessel density measurements. Although the malignant masses exhibited a strong gradient in vascularity, core &gt; periphery &gt; surrounding tissue, the benign masses had relatively uniform distribution of vascularity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(Z)) for the Doppler indices ranged from 0.56 +/‐ 0.07 to 0.65 +/‐ 0.07. A nonlinear analysis including age‐specific values of Doppler indices improved the diagnostic performance to A(Z) = 0.85 +/‐ 0.06. In conclusion, quantitative Doppler imaging when used in combination with a nonlinear rule‐based approach has the potential for differentiating between malignant and benign masses.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - blood supply</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microcirculation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neovascularization, Pathologic</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUuP1SAYhonROGdGf4Abw0Jn18qlLWDcmPGeMcbEWZMPyukwoZeBdprz7-WkJ-rOFQk878fLA0IvKCmFbPibu6UvGSGkpKoUZcXEI7SjdU0K1VD-GO0IE7KomBJn6DylO0IYoaJ6is4okUoy1exQ_3OBYfYzzP7B4QdIdgkQ_XzA4x6b6CDNuIeUXMLmgD-M0xRcxL6Hzg_dWxxd58cBQk5Gn2eMQ8IwtLj10A1jmr3N7BS83c6eoSd7CMk9P60X6ObTx19XX4rrH5-_Xr2_LmxNpSiYbaAF4VrbtHWjTFVxJsG0rjXMgJWG8oYJxQ2FWnLleLYhKuBV7axqKeUX6HKbO8XxfnFp1r1P1oUAgxuXpAVlvK6lyCDdQBvHlKLb6ynmx8WDpkQfHevsWB8da6q00Nlxzrw8DV9M79p_EpvUDLw6AVknhH2Ewfr0l8s_UgmZsXcbtvrgDv-_WH-7-X7coEpsNV5v8Vvf3a4-Op16CCGXonpd1z91fwOmF6a1</recordid><startdate>200007</startdate><enddate>200007</enddate><creator>Sehgal, C. M</creator><creator>Arger, P. H</creator><creator>Rowling, S. E</creator><creator>Conant, E. F</creator><creator>Reynolds, C</creator><creator>Patton, J. A</creator><general>Am inst Ulrrasound Med</general><general>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200007</creationdate><title>Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications</title><author>Sehgal, C. M ; Arger, P. H ; Rowling, S. E ; Conant, E. F ; Reynolds, C ; Patton, J. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5187-2c6ada7edc6d569b44328abdedb2bac8b1362793b1a5839e378674a345ec9d113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - blood supply</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microcirculation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neovascularization, Pathologic</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sehgal, C. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arger, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowling, S. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conant, E. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, J. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sehgal, C. M</au><au>Arger, P. H</au><au>Rowling, S. E</au><au>Conant, E. F</au><au>Reynolds, C</au><au>Patton, J. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2000-07</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>427-440</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><coden>JUMEDA</coden><abstract>Seventy‐four biopsy proven breast masses were imaged by color and power Doppler imaging to evaluate vascular pattern of malignant and benign breast masses. The images were analyzed for vascularity. The measurements were made over the entire mass as well as regionally at its core, at its periphery, and in the tissue surrounding it. The surgical specimens were analyzed for microvessel density. The diagnostic performance of Doppler sonographic vascularity indices was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The malignant masses were 14 to 54% more vascular than the benign masses. Both types of masses were more vascular by ultrasonography than the tissue surrounding them. Whereas benign masses were 2.2 times more vascular than the surrounding tissue, the malignant masses were 5.0 times more vascular. In a subset of patients the regional vascularity at the core, periphery, and surrounding tissue by Doppler imaging exhibited a strong correlation (R2 &gt; 0.9) with the corresponding histologic microvessel density measurements. Although the malignant masses exhibited a strong gradient in vascularity, core &gt; periphery &gt; surrounding tissue, the benign masses had relatively uniform distribution of vascularity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(Z)) for the Doppler indices ranged from 0.56 +/‐ 0.07 to 0.65 +/‐ 0.07. A nonlinear analysis including age‐specific values of Doppler indices improved the diagnostic performance to A(Z) = 0.85 +/‐ 0.06. In conclusion, quantitative Doppler imaging when used in combination with a nonlinear rule‐based approach has the potential for differentiating between malignant and benign masses.</abstract><cop>Laurel, MD</cop><pub>Am inst Ulrrasound Med</pub><pmid>10898296</pmid><doi>10.7863/jum.2000.19.7.427</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4297
ispartof Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2000-07, Vol.19 (7), p.427-440
issn 0278-4297
1550-9613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71235587
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Area Under Curve
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Breast - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - blood supply
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Genital system. Mammary gland
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Microcirculation
Middle Aged
Neovascularization, Pathologic
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tumors
Ultrasonic investigative techniques
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Ultrasonography, Mammary
title Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A43%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20vascularity%20of%20breast%20masses%20by%20Doppler%20imaging:%20regional%20variations%20and%20diagnostic%20implications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Sehgal,%20C.%20M&rft.date=2000-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=427-440&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft.coden=JUMEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/jum.2000.19.7.427&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71235587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5187-2c6ada7edc6d569b44328abdedb2bac8b1362793b1a5839e378674a345ec9d113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71235587&rft_id=info:pmid/10898296&rfr_iscdi=true