Loading…

Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements

Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study to explore the treatment effects of material stiffness and frequency of appliance change when using clear, sequential, removable appliances (aligners). Patients were stratified based on pretreatment peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and need for extra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2003-11, Vol.124 (5), p.502-508
Main Authors: Clements, Karen Michelle, Bollen, Anne-Marie, Huang, Greg, King, Greg, Hujoel, Philippe, Ma, Tsun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c50cae73e14f1ccb46823e4e68e1940f7b4050ffcb9fafe5cfbd0503ac5609e93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c50cae73e14f1ccb46823e4e68e1940f7b4050ffcb9fafe5cfbd0503ac5609e93
container_end_page 508
container_issue 5
container_start_page 502
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 124
creator Clements, Karen Michelle
Bollen, Anne-Marie
Huang, Greg
King, Greg
Hujoel, Philippe
Ma, Tsun
description Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study to explore the treatment effects of material stiffness and frequency of appliance change when using clear, sequential, removable appliances (aligners). Patients were stratified based on pretreatment peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and need for extractions. They were randomized into 4 treatment protocols: 1-week activation with soft material, 1-week activation with hard material, 2-week activation with soft material, and 2-week activation with hard material. Patients continued with their protocols until either the series of aligners was completed, or until it was determined that the aligner was not fitting well (study end point). Weighted PAR score and average incisor irregularity (AII) indexes were used to measure pretreatment and end-point study models, and average improvement was compared among the 4 groups. In addition to the evaluation of the 4 treatment groups, comparisons were made of the individual components of the PAR score to determine which occlusal components experienced the most correction with the aligners. The percentages and absolute extraction space closures were evaluated, and papillary bleeding scores before and during treatment were compared. Although no statistical difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups, a trend was noted with the 2-week frequency having a larger percentage of reduction in weighted PAR and AII scores, and greater extraction space closure. Anterior alignment was the most improved component, and buccal occlusion was the least improved. When analyzed by type of extraction, incisor extraction sites had a significantly greater percentage of closure than either maxillary or mandibular premolar extraction sites. A statistically significant decrease in mean average papillary bleeding score was found during treatment when compared with pretreatment scores, although this difference was not clinically significant.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00577-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71360556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540603005778</els_id><sourcerecordid>71360556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c50cae73e14f1ccb46823e4e68e1940f7b4050ffcb9fafe5cfbd0503ac5609e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLJDEUhcOgaPv4CSNZiS7KuelKUlVupGl1RhAUnFmHVOoGI1WVNkk3zL83_UCXri45nHPPzUfITwZXDJj89QJ13RSCg7yA8hJAVFVR_yATBk1VyEpM98jk03JIjmJ8A4CGT-GAHDIuGedMTkiYmeRWOjk_0uQGpHrs6KATBqd7GpOzdsQYqbc04vsSx7TWAw5-pdseqQ_p1Xc-y4bqxaJ3ejQYr-izDolOr-ltTuSAGxbBr3DIr3hC9q3uI57u5jH5d3_3d_6neHz6_TCfPRaGM5YKI8BorEpk3DJjWi7raYkcZY2s4WCrloMAa03bWG1RGNt2WSi1ERIabMpjcr7dm6vz5TGpwUWDfa9H9MuoKlZKEEJmo9gaTfAxBrRqEdygw3_FQK1hqw1stSapoFQb2KrOubNdwbIdsPtK7ehmw83WgPmbK4dBReMwA-pcQJNU5903FR_cQZGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71360556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Clements, Karen Michelle ; Bollen, Anne-Marie ; Huang, Greg ; King, Greg ; Hujoel, Philippe ; Ma, Tsun</creator><creatorcontrib>Clements, Karen Michelle ; Bollen, Anne-Marie ; Huang, Greg ; King, Greg ; Hujoel, Philippe ; Ma, Tsun</creatorcontrib><description>Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study to explore the treatment effects of material stiffness and frequency of appliance change when using clear, sequential, removable appliances (aligners). Patients were stratified based on pretreatment peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and need for extractions. They were randomized into 4 treatment protocols: 1-week activation with soft material, 1-week activation with hard material, 2-week activation with soft material, and 2-week activation with hard material. Patients continued with their protocols until either the series of aligners was completed, or until it was determined that the aligner was not fitting well (study end point). Weighted PAR score and average incisor irregularity (AII) indexes were used to measure pretreatment and end-point study models, and average improvement was compared among the 4 groups. In addition to the evaluation of the 4 treatment groups, comparisons were made of the individual components of the PAR score to determine which occlusal components experienced the most correction with the aligners. The percentages and absolute extraction space closures were evaluated, and papillary bleeding scores before and during treatment were compared. Although no statistical difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups, a trend was noted with the 2-week frequency having a larger percentage of reduction in weighted PAR and AII scores, and greater extraction space closure. Anterior alignment was the most improved component, and buccal occlusion was the least improved. When analyzed by type of extraction, incisor extraction sites had a significantly greater percentage of closure than either maxillary or mandibular premolar extraction sites. A statistically significant decrease in mean average papillary bleeding score was found during treatment when compared with pretreatment scores, although this difference was not clinically significant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00577-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14614416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Activator Appliances ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion - therapy ; Middle Aged ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation ; Orthodontics, Corrective - methods ; Peer Review, Health Care ; Plastics ; Time Factors ; Tooth Extraction ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2003-11, Vol.124 (5), p.502-508</ispartof><rights>2003 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c50cae73e14f1ccb46823e4e68e1940f7b4050ffcb9fafe5cfbd0503ac5609e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c50cae73e14f1ccb46823e4e68e1940f7b4050ffcb9fafe5cfbd0503ac5609e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14614416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clements, Karen Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hujoel, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Tsun</creatorcontrib><title>Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study to explore the treatment effects of material stiffness and frequency of appliance change when using clear, sequential, removable appliances (aligners). Patients were stratified based on pretreatment peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and need for extractions. They were randomized into 4 treatment protocols: 1-week activation with soft material, 1-week activation with hard material, 2-week activation with soft material, and 2-week activation with hard material. Patients continued with their protocols until either the series of aligners was completed, or until it was determined that the aligner was not fitting well (study end point). Weighted PAR score and average incisor irregularity (AII) indexes were used to measure pretreatment and end-point study models, and average improvement was compared among the 4 groups. In addition to the evaluation of the 4 treatment groups, comparisons were made of the individual components of the PAR score to determine which occlusal components experienced the most correction with the aligners. The percentages and absolute extraction space closures were evaluated, and papillary bleeding scores before and during treatment were compared. Although no statistical difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups, a trend was noted with the 2-week frequency having a larger percentage of reduction in weighted PAR and AII scores, and greater extraction space closure. Anterior alignment was the most improved component, and buccal occlusion was the least improved. When analyzed by type of extraction, incisor extraction sites had a significantly greater percentage of closure than either maxillary or mandibular premolar extraction sites. A statistically significant decrease in mean average papillary bleeding score was found during treatment when compared with pretreatment scores, although this difference was not clinically significant.</description><subject>Activator Appliances</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion - therapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation</subject><subject>Orthodontics, Corrective - methods</subject><subject>Peer Review, Health Care</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLJDEUhcOgaPv4CSNZiS7KuelKUlVupGl1RhAUnFmHVOoGI1WVNkk3zL83_UCXri45nHPPzUfITwZXDJj89QJ13RSCg7yA8hJAVFVR_yATBk1VyEpM98jk03JIjmJ8A4CGT-GAHDIuGedMTkiYmeRWOjk_0uQGpHrs6KATBqd7GpOzdsQYqbc04vsSx7TWAw5-pdseqQ_p1Xc-y4bqxaJ3ejQYr-izDolOr-ltTuSAGxbBr3DIr3hC9q3uI57u5jH5d3_3d_6neHz6_TCfPRaGM5YKI8BorEpk3DJjWi7raYkcZY2s4WCrloMAa03bWG1RGNt2WSi1ERIabMpjcr7dm6vz5TGpwUWDfa9H9MuoKlZKEEJmo9gaTfAxBrRqEdygw3_FQK1hqw1stSapoFQb2KrOubNdwbIdsPtK7ehmw83WgPmbK4dBReMwA-pcQJNU5903FR_cQZGQ</recordid><startdate>200311</startdate><enddate>200311</enddate><creator>Clements, Karen Michelle</creator><creator>Bollen, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Huang, Greg</creator><creator>King, Greg</creator><creator>Hujoel, Philippe</creator><creator>Ma, Tsun</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200311</creationdate><title>Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements</title><author>Clements, Karen Michelle ; Bollen, Anne-Marie ; Huang, Greg ; King, Greg ; Hujoel, Philippe ; Ma, Tsun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c50cae73e14f1ccb46823e4e68e1940f7b4050ffcb9fafe5cfbd0503ac5609e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Activator Appliances</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion - therapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation</topic><topic>Orthodontics, Corrective - methods</topic><topic>Peer Review, Health Care</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clements, Karen Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hujoel, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Tsun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clements, Karen Michelle</au><au>Bollen, Anne-Marie</au><au>Huang, Greg</au><au>King, Greg</au><au>Hujoel, Philippe</au><au>Ma, Tsun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2003-11</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>502-508</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study to explore the treatment effects of material stiffness and frequency of appliance change when using clear, sequential, removable appliances (aligners). Patients were stratified based on pretreatment peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and need for extractions. They were randomized into 4 treatment protocols: 1-week activation with soft material, 1-week activation with hard material, 2-week activation with soft material, and 2-week activation with hard material. Patients continued with their protocols until either the series of aligners was completed, or until it was determined that the aligner was not fitting well (study end point). Weighted PAR score and average incisor irregularity (AII) indexes were used to measure pretreatment and end-point study models, and average improvement was compared among the 4 groups. In addition to the evaluation of the 4 treatment groups, comparisons were made of the individual components of the PAR score to determine which occlusal components experienced the most correction with the aligners. The percentages and absolute extraction space closures were evaluated, and papillary bleeding scores before and during treatment were compared. Although no statistical difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups, a trend was noted with the 2-week frequency having a larger percentage of reduction in weighted PAR and AII scores, and greater extraction space closure. Anterior alignment was the most improved component, and buccal occlusion was the least improved. When analyzed by type of extraction, incisor extraction sites had a significantly greater percentage of closure than either maxillary or mandibular premolar extraction sites. A statistically significant decrease in mean average papillary bleeding score was found during treatment when compared with pretreatment scores, although this difference was not clinically significant.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>14614416</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00577-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2003-11, Vol.124 (5), p.502-508
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71360556
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Activator Appliances
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Male
Malocclusion - therapy
Middle Aged
Orthodontic Appliance Design
Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation
Orthodontics, Corrective - methods
Peer Review, Health Care
Plastics
Time Factors
Tooth Extraction
Treatment Outcome
title Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Activation%20time%20and%20material%20stiffness%20of%20sequential%20removable%20orthodontic%20appliances.%20Part%202:%20Dental%20improvements&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Clements,%20Karen%20Michelle&rft.date=2003-11&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=502-508&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00577-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71360556%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c50cae73e14f1ccb46823e4e68e1940f7b4050ffcb9fafe5cfbd0503ac5609e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71360556&rft_id=info:pmid/14614416&rfr_iscdi=true