Serum insulin‐like growth factor (IGF)‐1 and IGF‐binding protein‐3 do not correlate with Gleason score or quantity of prostate cancer in biopsy samples

• Published in: BJU international 2003-11, Vol.92 (7), p.699-702
• Main Authors: Ismail, H.A., Pollak, M., Behlouli, H., Tanguay, S., Bégin, L.R., Aprikian, A.G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Biological and medical sciences; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood; Biopsy - methods; Biopsy - standards; Humans; IGFBP3; IGF‐1; Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 - blood; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I - analysis; insulin‐like growth factor; Male; Medical sciences; Neoplasm Proteins - blood; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases; prediction; Prostate - pathology; prostate cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tumors of the urinary system; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Urinary tract. Prostate gland
• ISSN: 1464-4096; 1464-410X
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04084.x

OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship of serum insulin‐like growth factor (IGF)‐1 and IGF binding protein‐3 (IGFBP‐3) with histological cancer characteristics in men undergoing transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)‐guided biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (652), with either an elevated serum prostate‐specific antigen level or an abnormal digital rectal examination, were initially evaluated by TRUS and sextant prostatic needle biopsy. Blood was drawn before biopsy, serum extracted and stored frozen until IGF‐1 and IGFBP‐3 were measured. In all, 241 patients had prostate cancer (37%) and were included in this study. The number of positive biopsies, the volume of tumour in each positive biopsy and the Gleason score were recorded. RESULTS Of the 241 patients, 37 had five or six positive biopsies (from six), 128 had two to four and 76 had one. Serum IGF‐1 did not correlate with the number of positive biopsies, with means of 176.7, 178.3 and 164.4 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.3), while the mean IGFBP‐3 was 2695, 2795 and 2572 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.09). The additive percentiles of tumour volume in positive biopsies were assessed for each patient but serum IGF‐1 and IGFBP‐3 did not correlate (P = 0.7 and 0.9, respectively). In all, 92 patients had a Gleason score of  7; the mean (sd) IGF‐1 levels for the three groups were 181 (39), 174.6 (35) and 176 (26) ng/mL, and the mean IGFBP‐3 2798 (240), 2735 (284) and 2647 (221) ng/mL, respectively, none of the differences being statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Serum IGF‐1 and IGFBP‐3 do not correlate with quantity of cancer or Gleason score in biopsy samples from patients with prostate cancer.