Loading…

Preserving Informational Separability and Violating Decisional Separability in Facial Perception and Recognition

The holistic encoding hypothesis ( M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, & J. N. Tanaka, 1998 ) proposes that faces are encoded and used in perception and cognition as relatively undifferentiated wholes. A previous study ( M. J. Wenger & E. M. Ingvalson, 2002 ) found very little support for t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2003-11, Vol.29 (6), p.1106-1118
Main Authors: Wenger, Michael J, Ingvalson, Erin M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-fa96a8d145334a15b50c009a9446719a7b44e8730b134cc7b730d8c5564577b13
cites
container_end_page 1118
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1106
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 29
creator Wenger, Michael J
Ingvalson, Erin M
description The holistic encoding hypothesis ( M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, & J. N. Tanaka, 1998 ) proposes that faces are encoded and used in perception and cognition as relatively undifferentiated wholes. A previous study ( M. J. Wenger & E. M. Ingvalson, 2002 ) found very little support for the strong version of this hypothesis and instead found evidence that shifts in decisional criteria may be important. This study provides a replication and stronger test of those findings, demonstrating consistent violations of decisional separability and preservation of informational separability in both immediate perception and delayed recognition.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1106
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71389950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>661241691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-fa96a8d145334a15b50c009a9446719a7b44e8730b134cc7b730d8c5564577b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdtKxDAQhoMouh6eQJAi6F3XpEma5lI8Lggunm7DNJtKJD2YdMV9e1NdXBExN8nMfP8MmR-hfYLHBFNxgjNRpIJKOs7kOB8TgvM1NCKSypRkBV9Ho29iC22H8IKHQ4tNtEVYnmWY4xHqpt4E499s85xMmqr1NfS2bcAl96YDD6V1tl8k0MySJ9u6WIzgudE2_EHZJrkEbWN6arw23dDpU3pndPvc2CHeRRsVuGD2lvcOery8eDi7Tm9uryZnpzcpMML7tAKZQzEjjFPKgPCSY42xBMlYLogEUTJmCkFxSSjTWpTxOSs05znjQsTkDjr-6tv59nVuQq9qG7RxDhrTzoMShBZSchzBw1_gSzv38W9B5YQxRjlh_0FZLIu412Ek_YK0b0PwplKdtzX4hSJYDZapwRA1GKIyqXI1WBZVB8vW87I2s5Vm6VEEjpYABA2u8tDE9a84TjOBWbHioAPVhYUG31vtTFDvrv4x8APcmqom</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614443514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preserving Informational Separability and Violating Decisional Separability in Facial Perception and Recognition</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Wenger, Michael J ; Ingvalson, Erin M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wenger, Michael J ; Ingvalson, Erin M</creatorcontrib><description>The holistic encoding hypothesis ( M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, &amp; J. N. Tanaka, 1998 ) proposes that faces are encoded and used in perception and cognition as relatively undifferentiated wholes. A previous study ( M. J. Wenger &amp; E. M. Ingvalson, 2002 ) found very little support for the strong version of this hypothesis and instead found evidence that shifts in decisional criteria may be important. This study provides a replication and stronger test of those findings, demonstrating consistent violations of decisional separability and preservation of informational separability in both immediate perception and delayed recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14622050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Decision Making ; Discrimination Learning ; Eyes &amp; eyesight ; Face ; Face Perception ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Human Information Storage ; Humans ; Information ; Likelihood Functions ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; Perceptual Discrimination ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Recognition ; Recognition (Learning) ; Retention (Psychology) ; Sensory perception ; Stimulus Parameters ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2003-11, Vol.29 (6), p.1106-1118</ispartof><rights>2003 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2003</rights><rights>2003, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-fa96a8d145334a15b50c009a9446719a7b44e8730b134cc7b730d8c5564577b13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15327048$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14622050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wenger, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingvalson, Erin M</creatorcontrib><title>Preserving Informational Separability and Violating Decisional Separability in Facial Perception and Recognition</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>The holistic encoding hypothesis ( M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, &amp; J. N. Tanaka, 1998 ) proposes that faces are encoded and used in perception and cognition as relatively undifferentiated wholes. A previous study ( M. J. Wenger &amp; E. M. Ingvalson, 2002 ) found very little support for the strong version of this hypothesis and instead found evidence that shifts in decisional criteria may be important. This study provides a replication and stronger test of those findings, demonstrating consistent violations of decisional separability and preservation of informational separability in both immediate perception and delayed recognition.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Eyes &amp; eyesight</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Face Perception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Information Storage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Discrimination</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition (Learning)</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Stimulus Parameters</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdtKxDAQhoMouh6eQJAi6F3XpEma5lI8Lggunm7DNJtKJD2YdMV9e1NdXBExN8nMfP8MmR-hfYLHBFNxgjNRpIJKOs7kOB8TgvM1NCKSypRkBV9Ho29iC22H8IKHQ4tNtEVYnmWY4xHqpt4E499s85xMmqr1NfS2bcAl96YDD6V1tl8k0MySJ9u6WIzgudE2_EHZJrkEbWN6arw23dDpU3pndPvc2CHeRRsVuGD2lvcOery8eDi7Tm9uryZnpzcpMML7tAKZQzEjjFPKgPCSY42xBMlYLogEUTJmCkFxSSjTWpTxOSs05znjQsTkDjr-6tv59nVuQq9qG7RxDhrTzoMShBZSchzBw1_gSzv38W9B5YQxRjlh_0FZLIu412Ek_YK0b0PwplKdtzX4hSJYDZapwRA1GKIyqXI1WBZVB8vW87I2s5Vm6VEEjpYABA2u8tDE9a84TjOBWbHioAPVhYUG31vtTFDvrv4x8APcmqom</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Wenger, Michael J</creator><creator>Ingvalson, Erin M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>Preserving Informational Separability and Violating Decisional Separability in Facial Perception and Recognition</title><author>Wenger, Michael J ; Ingvalson, Erin M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-fa96a8d145334a15b50c009a9446719a7b44e8730b134cc7b730d8c5564577b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Eyes &amp; eyesight</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Face Perception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Information Storage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Discrimination</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition (Learning)</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Stimulus Parameters</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wenger, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingvalson, Erin M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wenger, Michael J</au><au>Ingvalson, Erin M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preserving Informational Separability and Violating Decisional Separability in Facial Perception and Recognition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1106</spage><epage>1118</epage><pages>1106-1118</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>The holistic encoding hypothesis ( M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, &amp; J. N. Tanaka, 1998 ) proposes that faces are encoded and used in perception and cognition as relatively undifferentiated wholes. A previous study ( M. J. Wenger &amp; E. M. Ingvalson, 2002 ) found very little support for the strong version of this hypothesis and instead found evidence that shifts in decisional criteria may be important. This study provides a replication and stronger test of those findings, demonstrating consistent violations of decisional separability and preservation of informational separability in both immediate perception and delayed recognition.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>14622050</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1106</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2003-11, Vol.29 (6), p.1106-1118
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71389950
source PsycARTICLES; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Adult
Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Decision Making
Discrimination Learning
Eyes & eyesight
Face
Face Perception
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Human Information Storage
Humans
Information
Likelihood Functions
Male
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perception
Perceptual Discrimination
Psychological Theory
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Recognition
Recognition (Learning)
Retention (Psychology)
Sensory perception
Stimulus Parameters
Vision
title Preserving Informational Separability and Violating Decisional Separability in Facial Perception and Recognition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preserving%20Informational%20Separability%20and%20Violating%20Decisional%20Separability%20in%20Facial%20Perception%20and%20Recognition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Wenger,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1106&rft.epage=1118&rft.pages=1106-1118&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E661241691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-fa96a8d145334a15b50c009a9446719a7b44e8730b134cc7b730d8c5564577b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614443514&rft_id=info:pmid/14622050&rfr_iscdi=true