Evaluation of an algorithm for calculation of serum “Bioavailable” testosterone (BAT)

To evaluate a recently published algorithm for calculation of serum “Bioavailable” Testosterone (BAT) using serum Total Testosterone (TT), Sex Steroid Binding Globulin (SSBG) [also commonly known as Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)] and albumin concentrations as parameters, in comparison with a l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical Biochemistry 2003-11, Vol.36 (8), p.591-596
Main Authors: Emadi-Konjin, Pasha, Bain, Jerald, Bromberg, Irvin L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Albumin
Algorithm
Algorithms
Bioavailable testosterone
Biological Availability
Female
Free testosterone
Humans
Male
Models, Chemical
Prospective Studies
Sex hormone binding globulin
Sex steroid binding globulin
Testosterone
Testosterone - blood
Testosterone - standards
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate a recently published algorithm for calculation of serum “Bioavailable” Testosterone (BAT) using serum Total Testosterone (TT), Sex Steroid Binding Globulin (SSBG) [also commonly known as Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)] and albumin concentrations as parameters, in comparison with a locally available “salting-out” BAT method. If satisfactory, this calculation could serve as a substitute for the BAT assay, which would amount to a major cost saving and faster turnaround time. During a 6-month period, 426 serum samples referred for BAT analysis to the Hospitals In-Common Laboratory of Toronto were also analyzed in-house for TT, SSBG and albumin for computation of comparison calculated BAT results. A good statistical correlation was obtained, but only after unexpectedly drastic empirical modification of the association constant values: r = 0.95, Calculated %BAT = 0.971 x Measured %BAT + 0.008. The endocrinologist/andrologist of our team (JB), who was the responsible physician for all patients included in this study, reviewed the tabulated and charted calculated BAT results and verified that they were clinically equivalent. Although it is feasible to calculate BAT, the algorithm is not directly portable. Before adopting such a calculation each laboratory should compare it with the locally available BAT method and consider adjusting the calculation to optimize the correlation. Future reassessment may be necessary whenever the SSBG, TT or BAT assay is changed.
ISSN:0009-9120
1873-2933
DOI:10.1016/S0009-9120(03)00076-6