Loading…

Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty

The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2002-03, Vol.122 (2), p.65-68
Main Authors: CILA, Erdal, GÜZEL, Volkan, ÖZALAY, Metin, TAN, Jale, SIMSEK, S. Aykin, KANATH, Ulunay, ÖZTÜRK, Akif
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3
cites
container_end_page 68
container_issue 2
container_start_page 65
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 122
creator CILA, Erdal
GÜZEL, Volkan
ÖZALAY, Metin
TAN, Jale
SIMSEK, S. Aykin
KANATH, Ulunay
ÖZTÜRK, Akif
description The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s004020100319
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262005429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgipvTo1cpiN6q7yVpfhxlqBMGHtRzSdOUVbu2Ju1g_70ZG4ieXkg-eXz5EnKJcIcA8j4AcKAQzwz1EZkiZzxlGsUxmYJmIlWQ4YSchfAJgFRpOCUTRKVAA5-SxdtYbEwYxpBsnA9xrF1ZmybpjTe9GVzTGJ-YvvedsaukbpOhG-LzV-tcYvyw8l3fxP_bc3JSmSa4i8OckY-nx_f5Il2-Pr_MH5apZVwOKZaZVZmpQFouWeaYdlYLLaoKFS1ZoUolnBIKUXJXlEwpHq9UIRVSXVDDZuR2vzcm-h5dGPJ1HewuZuu6MeQSuRaSswiv_8HPbvRtzJZTKihAxqmOKt0r67sQvKvy3tdr47c5Qr4rOP9TcPRXh61jEZv61YdGI7g5ABOsaSpvWluHX8cyppWQ7AcydoGN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262005429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>CILA, Erdal ; GÜZEL, Volkan ; ÖZALAY, Metin ; TAN, Jale ; SIMSEK, S. Aykin ; KANATH, Ulunay ; ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creator><creatorcontrib>CILA, Erdal ; GÜZEL, Volkan ; ÖZALAY, Metin ; TAN, Jale ; SIMSEK, S. Aykin ; KANATH, Ulunay ; ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creatorcontrib><description>The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004020100319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11880904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Joint surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Pain Measurement ; Patella - surgery ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Prospective Studies ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reference Values ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2002-03, Vol.122 (2), p.65-68</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (0000). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13539867$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11880904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CILA, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜZEL, Volkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZALAY, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Jale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANATH, Ulunay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creatorcontrib><title>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patella - surgery</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgipvTo1cpiN6q7yVpfhxlqBMGHtRzSdOUVbu2Ju1g_70ZG4ieXkg-eXz5EnKJcIcA8j4AcKAQzwz1EZkiZzxlGsUxmYJmIlWQ4YSchfAJgFRpOCUTRKVAA5-SxdtYbEwYxpBsnA9xrF1ZmybpjTe9GVzTGJ-YvvedsaukbpOhG-LzV-tcYvyw8l3fxP_bc3JSmSa4i8OckY-nx_f5Il2-Pr_MH5apZVwOKZaZVZmpQFouWeaYdlYLLaoKFS1ZoUolnBIKUXJXlEwpHq9UIRVSXVDDZuR2vzcm-h5dGPJ1HewuZuu6MeQSuRaSswiv_8HPbvRtzJZTKihAxqmOKt0r67sQvKvy3tdr47c5Qr4rOP9TcPRXh61jEZv61YdGI7g5ABOsaSpvWluHX8cyppWQ7AcydoGN</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>CILA, Erdal</creator><creator>GÜZEL, Volkan</creator><creator>ÖZALAY, Metin</creator><creator>TAN, Jale</creator><creator>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</creator><creator>KANATH, Ulunay</creator><creator>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</title><author>CILA, Erdal ; GÜZEL, Volkan ; ÖZALAY, Metin ; TAN, Jale ; SIMSEK, S. Aykin ; KANATH, Ulunay ; ÖZTÜRK, Akif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patella - surgery</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CILA, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜZEL, Volkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZALAY, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Jale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANATH, Ulunay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CILA, Erdal</au><au>GÜZEL, Volkan</au><au>ÖZALAY, Metin</au><au>TAN, Jale</au><au>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</au><au>KANATH, Ulunay</au><au>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>65-68</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11880904</pmid><doi>10.1007/s004020100319</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-8051
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2002-03, Vol.122 (2), p.65-68
issn 0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496743
source Springer Nature
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Joint surgery
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Orthopedic surgery
Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Osteoarticular system. Muscles
Pain Measurement
Patella - surgery
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Prospective Studies
Range of Motion, Articular
Reference Values
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Treatment Outcome
title Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subvastus%20versus%20medial%20parapatellar%20approach%20in%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=CILA,%20Erdal&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=65-68&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004020100319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2262005429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262005429&rft_id=info:pmid/11880904&rfr_iscdi=true