Loading…
Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty
The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2002-03, Vol.122 (2), p.65-68 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 68 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | CILA, Erdal GÜZEL, Volkan ÖZALAY, Metin TAN, Jale SIMSEK, S. Aykin KANATH, Ulunay ÖZTÜRK, Akif |
description | The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s004020100319 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262005429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgipvTo1cpiN6q7yVpfhxlqBMGHtRzSdOUVbu2Ju1g_70ZG4ieXkg-eXz5EnKJcIcA8j4AcKAQzwz1EZkiZzxlGsUxmYJmIlWQ4YSchfAJgFRpOCUTRKVAA5-SxdtYbEwYxpBsnA9xrF1ZmybpjTe9GVzTGJ-YvvedsaukbpOhG-LzV-tcYvyw8l3fxP_bc3JSmSa4i8OckY-nx_f5Il2-Pr_MH5apZVwOKZaZVZmpQFouWeaYdlYLLaoKFS1ZoUolnBIKUXJXlEwpHq9UIRVSXVDDZuR2vzcm-h5dGPJ1HewuZuu6MeQSuRaSswiv_8HPbvRtzJZTKihAxqmOKt0r67sQvKvy3tdr47c5Qr4rOP9TcPRXh61jEZv61YdGI7g5ABOsaSpvWluHX8cyppWQ7AcydoGN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262005429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>CILA, Erdal ; GÜZEL, Volkan ; ÖZALAY, Metin ; TAN, Jale ; SIMSEK, S. Aykin ; KANATH, Ulunay ; ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creator><creatorcontrib>CILA, Erdal ; GÜZEL, Volkan ; ÖZALAY, Metin ; TAN, Jale ; SIMSEK, S. Aykin ; KANATH, Ulunay ; ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creatorcontrib><description>The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004020100319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11880904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Joint surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Pain Measurement ; Patella - surgery ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Prospective Studies ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reference Values ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2002-03, Vol.122 (2), p.65-68</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (0000). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13539867$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11880904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CILA, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜZEL, Volkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZALAY, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Jale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANATH, Ulunay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creatorcontrib><title>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patella - surgery</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgipvTo1cpiN6q7yVpfhxlqBMGHtRzSdOUVbu2Ju1g_70ZG4ieXkg-eXz5EnKJcIcA8j4AcKAQzwz1EZkiZzxlGsUxmYJmIlWQ4YSchfAJgFRpOCUTRKVAA5-SxdtYbEwYxpBsnA9xrF1ZmybpjTe9GVzTGJ-YvvedsaukbpOhG-LzV-tcYvyw8l3fxP_bc3JSmSa4i8OckY-nx_f5Il2-Pr_MH5apZVwOKZaZVZmpQFouWeaYdlYLLaoKFS1ZoUolnBIKUXJXlEwpHq9UIRVSXVDDZuR2vzcm-h5dGPJ1HewuZuu6MeQSuRaSswiv_8HPbvRtzJZTKihAxqmOKt0r67sQvKvy3tdr47c5Qr4rOP9TcPRXh61jEZv61YdGI7g5ABOsaSpvWluHX8cyppWQ7AcydoGN</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>CILA, Erdal</creator><creator>GÜZEL, Volkan</creator><creator>ÖZALAY, Metin</creator><creator>TAN, Jale</creator><creator>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</creator><creator>KANATH, Ulunay</creator><creator>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</title><author>CILA, Erdal ; GÜZEL, Volkan ; ÖZALAY, Metin ; TAN, Jale ; SIMSEK, S. Aykin ; KANATH, Ulunay ; ÖZTÜRK, Akif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patella - surgery</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CILA, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜZEL, Volkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZALAY, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Jale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANATH, Ulunay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CILA, Erdal</au><au>GÜZEL, Volkan</au><au>ÖZALAY, Metin</au><au>TAN, Jale</au><au>SIMSEK, S. Aykin</au><au>KANATH, Ulunay</au><au>ÖZTÜRK, Akif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>65-68</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>The subvastus approach for total knee replacement was compared with the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of postoperative knee scores and quadriceps strength. Two groups of patients with similar characteristics were formed: the first group consisted of 12 knees of 9 patients who were implanted via the medial parapatellar approach, and for the second group the subvastus approach was used in 10 knees of 10 patients. The groups' knee scores and quadriceps strength were compared preoperatively and postoperatively at week 6, months 3 and 6. The knee scores improved similarly in both groups, but the change was more pronounced in the subvastus group. Quadriceps strength was greater in the subvastus group at postoperative week 6, but there was no significant difference between the groups in months 3 and 6. It was concluded that although the subvastus approach offers greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period, it has no significant advantage in this aspect over the medial parapatellar approach.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11880904</pmid><doi>10.1007/s004020100319</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2002-03, Vol.122 (2), p.65-68 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496743 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Biological and medical sciences Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Joint surgery Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Orthopedic surgery Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery Osteoarticular system. Muscles Pain Measurement Patella - surgery Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Prospective Studies Range of Motion, Articular Reference Values Sensitivity and Specificity Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Treatment Outcome |
title | Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subvastus%20versus%20medial%20parapatellar%20approach%20in%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=CILA,%20Erdal&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=65-68&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004020100319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2262005429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1d5c85af07c4735e39ec9696ff182d3b8d86e8681174ebd38848d88b78129b2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262005429&rft_id=info:pmid/11880904&rfr_iscdi=true |