Assessing mood in patients with multiple sclerosis

• Published in: Clinical rehabilitation 2003-12, Vol.17 (8), p.847-857
• Main Authors: Groom, Madeleine J, Lincoln, Nadina B, Francis, Valerie M, Stephan, Talal F
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Affect; Analysis of Variance; Assessment; Biological and medical sciences; Caregivers - psychology; England; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Mood Disorders - diagnosis; Moods; Multiple sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis - psychology; Multiple Sclerosis - rehabilitation; Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis; Neurology; Observational research; Observer Variation; Patients; Psychological Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Selfreport measures; Statistics, Nonparametric; Test-Retest reliability
• ISSN: 0269-2155; 1477-0873
• DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr688oa

Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of mood measures for use with people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Design: Four mood measures designed for use with people with communication and cognitive problems were completed; two were completed with the patient at interview and two by hospital staff or carers of the patients. This procedure was repeated two weeks later to assess test–retest reliability. Subjects: People with MS at a rehabilitation unit (n = 22) and living in the community (n = 27). Main outcome measures: The Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire (SADQ) and Signs of Depression Scale (SODS) were completed by rehabilitation unit staff or by carers of the patients. An assistant psychologist completed the Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale (VASES) and the Visual Analogue Mood Scales (VAMS) with each patient. The Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS) was administered to assess physical disability. Nonprofessional carers were asked to complete the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12) about themselves. Results: In both samples there were significant correlations between scores on the two self-report measures (VASES and VAMS) (r s = 0.51–0.79) and between scores on the two observational measures (SADQ and SODS) (r s = 0.62–0.81) but not between the observational and self-report measures. There was a significant correlation between the SODS and the carer GHQ (r s = 0.68, p < 0.01), indicating that carer mood infuenced reporting of patients' mood. There was no significant infuenced of profession on the observational measures, indicating good inter-rater reliability. Test–retest reliability was high for patients in the community but not for patients in hospital. Conclusions: In both the inpatient and community samples, the self-report and observational mood measures appeared to be measuring different aspects of patients' mood. Further investigation is needed to determine which of these is providing the most accurate information.