Loading…

Comparative evaluation of d-dimer assays for exclusion of deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients

Diagnostic work-up of patients sent to the hospital for diagnosing of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) often combines the determination of d-dimer and the application of a clinical probability score. To fulfill diagnostic as well as economic needs, d-dimer assays should exhibit a high negative predictiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thrombosis research 2003, Vol.112 (1), p.25-32
Main Authors: Engelhardt, Wolfgang, Palareti, Gualtiero, Legnani, Cristina, Gringel, Erika
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Diagnostic work-up of patients sent to the hospital for diagnosing of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) often combines the determination of d-dimer and the application of a clinical probability score. To fulfill diagnostic as well as economic needs, d-dimer assays should exhibit a high negative predictive value (NPV) as well as reasonable specificity. In this study, we evaluated both a latex-enhanced immunoassay for use on routine coagulation analyzers and a radial partition immunoassay (RPIA) for use on a point-of-care analyzer. Samples included were from 344 outpatients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. Among them, 100 had deep venous thrombosis. Results obtained for both assays show a good efficiency for exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with well-acceptable specificity.
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2003.11.002