Loading…

Assessment of the safety and efficacy of the DUETT vascular hemostasis device: Final results of the safe and effective vascular hemostasis (SEAL) trial

Objective We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of the novel DUETT vascular hemostasis device in comparison with standard manual compression after diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. Background Vascular hemostasis devices are increasingly used to improve patient comfort and s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American heart journal 2002-04, Vol.143 (4), p.612-619
Main Author: The SEAL Trial Study Team
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of the novel DUETT vascular hemostasis device in comparison with standard manual compression after diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. Background Vascular hemostasis devices are increasingly used to improve patient comfort and speed mobilization after coronary and peripheral vascular procedures. Currently available devices have certain limitations, however. Methods At 16 clinical sites, 630 patients who underwent diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures were randomized 5:3 to the DUETT sealing device or standard manual compression. The primary study end points were time to hemostasis and ambulation and the incidence of major vascular complications at 30 days. Results Time to hemostasis from the completion of the procedure (catheter removal; median) was 14 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 10, 17 minutes) in the DUETT group and 195 minutes (IQR, 46, 351 minutes) in the standard compression group ( P
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1067/mhj.2002.121464