Loading…

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spinal cord: Interleaved echo-planar imaging is superior to fast spin-echo

Purpose To compare and evaluate two novel diffusion‐weighted sequences, based either on fast spin‐echo (FSE) or interleaved echo‐planar imaging (EPI) methods, as potential tools for investing spinal cord abnormalities. Materials and Methods Following recent improvements, both interleaved EPI (IEPI)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.364-373
Main Authors: Bammer, Roland, Augustin, Michael, Prokesch, Rupert W., Stollberger, Rudolf, Fazekas, Franz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To compare and evaluate two novel diffusion‐weighted sequences, based either on fast spin‐echo (FSE) or interleaved echo‐planar imaging (EPI) methods, as potential tools for investing spinal cord abnormalities. Materials and Methods Following recent improvements, both interleaved EPI (IEPI) and FSE techniques could be alternative approaches for rapid diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI). Therefore, a navigated diffusion‐weighted multishot FSE sequence and a fat‐suppressed navigated diffusion‐weighted IEPI sequence with local shimming capabilities were tested. Both methods were compared in a consecutive series of five healthy volunteers and five patients with suspected intramedullary lesions. The sequences were graded qualitatively as either superior, inferior, or equal in quality, and also quantitatively by measuring the amount of ghosting artifacts in the background. Quantitative measurements of the diffusion coefficients within the spine were included. Results The overall image quality of IEPI was superior to FSE. Two out of five FSE scans were rated with poor image quality, whereas all IEPI scans were of sufficient quality. The ghosting levels ranged from approximately 3.3% to 6.2% for IEPI and from approximately 7.5% to 18.9% for FSE. Diffusion coefficients measured in healthy volunteers were similar for both IEPI and FSE, but showed higher fluctuations with the FSE technique. Conclusion Despite potential advantages of FSE, the IEPI technique is preferable for DWI applications in the spinal cord. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;15:364–373. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.10075