Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a first-trimester ultrasound aneuploidy screening program

• Published in: Prenatal diagnosis 2008-06, Vol.28 (6), p.531-534
• Main Authors: Sepulveda, Waldo, Wong, Amy E., Casasbuenas, Alexandra, Solari, Aldo, Alcalde, Juan L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aneuploidy; Biological and medical sciences; Cephalometry; congenital diaphragmatic hernia; Crown-Rump Length; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation; Female; fetal ultrasound; first trimester; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Hernia, Diaphragmatic - diagnostic imaging; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital; Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Medical sciences; Molecular and cellular biology; Nasal Bone - diagnostic imaging; nuchal translucency; Nuchal Translucency Measurement; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
• ISSN: 0197-3851; 1097-0223
• DOI: 10.1002/pd.2019

Objectives To review our experience with the prenatal detection of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in fetuses presenting for ultrasound screening of chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester. Methods As part of our first‐trimester ultrasound protocol, fetuses with a crown‐rump length between 45 and 84 mm underwent a limited anatomical assessment in conjunction with nuchal translucency thickness measurement and nasal bone assessment. Cases of CDH diagnosed prenatally or after delivery in this population were identified. Results Among the six cases of CDH detected (prevalence of 1 in 927), the first‐trimester ultrasound findings were abnormal in five fetuses (83%), including three with increased nuchal translucency only; one with increased nuchal translucency, an intrathoracic stomach, dextrocardia and a cephalocele; and one with normal nuchal translucency thickness and a small, complex intrathoracic mass later confirmed as the fetal stomach. The diagnosis of CDH was confidently made in the first trimester in one case, in the second trimester in three cases, and after birth in the remaining two cases. Conclusion The diagnosis of CDH in the first trimester is difficult, especially in those cases in which the defect is small or late migration of the abdominal viscera occurs. Therefore, screening for CDH in the first trimester is unlikely to be effective. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.