Loading…
Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences
This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Personality & social psychology bulletin 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.965-977 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03 |
container_end_page | 977 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 965 |
container_title | Personality & social psychology bulletin |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Poon, Connie S. K. Koehler, Derek J. |
description | This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0146167208316690 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71670570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0146167208316690</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57237843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUlA8Bbdj2x215sUv6BQ0XoO22SiW5Js3d0c-u_d0IJSEE8zwzzzDjMvQucEXxMixA0mWU5yQbFkJM8VPkBjwjlNRcbYIRoP7XToj9CJ9yuMcZZn9BiNiMxyRTgbo_kLOG-7ZPEJ1hnwt0NmXLKAdm2dbpK3oJemMWGT6K5KXqHRwUQ-2OS5C-CC0ybEtAYHXQn-FB3VuvFwtosT9P5wv5g-pbP54_P0bpbqjKuQUqoZB86lrnVV1SWhTEjJdEUlx6xUQmG6pKrGuWJZJQXBkuQkllpRIQGzCbra6q6d_erBh6I1voSm0R3Y3hcino25-B_kYlgd_zVBl3vgyvaui0cURNH4YJbhQQ5vqdJZ7x3UxdqZVrtNQXAxeFLsexJHLnbC_bKF6mdgZ0IE0i3g9Qf82vqX4DfnVJDy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928313400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Poon, Connie S. K. ; Koehler, Derek J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poon, Connie S. K. ; Koehler, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><description>This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0146167208316690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18469153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Culture ; Discrepancies ; Humans ; Impression formation ; Incremental theory ; Individual differences ; Individuality ; Interpersonal Relations ; Intuition ; Job performance ; Lay conceptions ; Pathology ; Personality ; Personality Development ; Personality tests ; Short term ; Stereotypes ; Stereotyping ; Students - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.965-977</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poon, Connie S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><title>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</title><title>Personality & social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.</description><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impression formation</subject><subject>Incremental theory</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Intuition</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Lay conceptions</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Development</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUlA8Bbdj2x215sUv6BQ0XoO22SiW5Js3d0c-u_d0IJSEE8zwzzzDjMvQucEXxMixA0mWU5yQbFkJM8VPkBjwjlNRcbYIRoP7XToj9CJ9yuMcZZn9BiNiMxyRTgbo_kLOG-7ZPEJ1hnwt0NmXLKAdm2dbpK3oJemMWGT6K5KXqHRwUQ-2OS5C-CC0ybEtAYHXQn-FB3VuvFwtosT9P5wv5g-pbP54_P0bpbqjKuQUqoZB86lrnVV1SWhTEjJdEUlx6xUQmG6pKrGuWJZJQXBkuQkllpRIQGzCbra6q6d_erBh6I1voSm0R3Y3hcino25-B_kYlgd_zVBl3vgyvaui0cURNH4YJbhQQ5vqdJZ7x3UxdqZVrtNQXAxeFLsexJHLnbC_bKF6mdgZ0IE0i3g9Qf82vqX4DfnVJDy</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>Poon, Connie S. K.</creator><creator>Koehler, Derek J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</title><author>Poon, Connie S. K. ; Koehler, Derek J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impression formation</topic><topic>Incremental theory</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Intuition</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Lay conceptions</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Development</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poon, Connie S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poon, Connie S. K.</au><au>Koehler, Derek J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</atitle><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>965</spage><epage>977</epage><pages>965-977</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18469153</pmid><doi>10.1177/0146167208316690</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-1672 |
ispartof | Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.965-977 |
issn | 0146-1672 1552-7433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71670570 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Culture Discrepancies Humans Impression formation Incremental theory Individual differences Individuality Interpersonal Relations Intuition Job performance Lay conceptions Pathology Personality Personality Development Personality tests Short term Stereotypes Stereotyping Students - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A16%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Person%20Theories:%20Their%20Temporal%20Stability%20and%20Relation%20to%20Intertrait%20Inferences&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Poon,%20Connie%20S.%20K.&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=965&rft.epage=977&rft.pages=965-977&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0146167208316690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57237843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928313400&rft_id=info:pmid/18469153&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0146167208316690&rfr_iscdi=true |