Loading…

Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences

This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality & social psychology bulletin 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.965-977
Main Authors: Poon, Connie S. K., Koehler, Derek J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03
container_end_page 977
container_issue 7
container_start_page 965
container_title Personality & social psychology bulletin
container_volume 34
creator Poon, Connie S. K.
Koehler, Derek J.
description This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0146167208316690
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71670570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0146167208316690</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57237843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUlA8Bbdj2x215sUv6BQ0XoO22SiW5Js3d0c-u_d0IJSEE8zwzzzDjMvQucEXxMixA0mWU5yQbFkJM8VPkBjwjlNRcbYIRoP7XToj9CJ9yuMcZZn9BiNiMxyRTgbo_kLOG-7ZPEJ1hnwt0NmXLKAdm2dbpK3oJemMWGT6K5KXqHRwUQ-2OS5C-CC0ybEtAYHXQn-FB3VuvFwtosT9P5wv5g-pbP54_P0bpbqjKuQUqoZB86lrnVV1SWhTEjJdEUlx6xUQmG6pKrGuWJZJQXBkuQkllpRIQGzCbra6q6d_erBh6I1voSm0R3Y3hcino25-B_kYlgd_zVBl3vgyvaui0cURNH4YJbhQQ5vqdJZ7x3UxdqZVrtNQXAxeFLsexJHLnbC_bKF6mdgZ0IE0i3g9Qf82vqX4DfnVJDy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928313400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Poon, Connie S. K. ; Koehler, Derek J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poon, Connie S. K. ; Koehler, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><description>This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0146167208316690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18469153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Culture ; Discrepancies ; Humans ; Impression formation ; Incremental theory ; Individual differences ; Individuality ; Interpersonal Relations ; Intuition ; Job performance ; Lay conceptions ; Pathology ; Personality ; Personality Development ; Personality tests ; Short term ; Stereotypes ; Stereotyping ; Students - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin, 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.965-977</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poon, Connie S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><title>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</title><title>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.</description><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impression formation</subject><subject>Incremental theory</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Intuition</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Lay conceptions</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Development</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUlA8Bbdj2x215sUv6BQ0XoO22SiW5Js3d0c-u_d0IJSEE8zwzzzDjMvQucEXxMixA0mWU5yQbFkJM8VPkBjwjlNRcbYIRoP7XToj9CJ9yuMcZZn9BiNiMxyRTgbo_kLOG-7ZPEJ1hnwt0NmXLKAdm2dbpK3oJemMWGT6K5KXqHRwUQ-2OS5C-CC0ybEtAYHXQn-FB3VuvFwtosT9P5wv5g-pbP54_P0bpbqjKuQUqoZB86lrnVV1SWhTEjJdEUlx6xUQmG6pKrGuWJZJQXBkuQkllpRIQGzCbra6q6d_erBh6I1voSm0R3Y3hcino25-B_kYlgd_zVBl3vgyvaui0cURNH4YJbhQQ5vqdJZ7x3UxdqZVrtNQXAxeFLsexJHLnbC_bKF6mdgZ0IE0i3g9Qf82vqX4DfnVJDy</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>Poon, Connie S. K.</creator><creator>Koehler, Derek J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</title><author>Poon, Connie S. K. ; Koehler, Derek J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impression formation</topic><topic>Incremental theory</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Intuition</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Lay conceptions</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Development</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poon, Connie S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poon, Connie S. K.</au><au>Koehler, Derek J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences</atitle><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>965</spage><epage>977</epage><pages>965-977</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test—retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18469153</pmid><doi>10.1177/0146167208316690</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-1672
ispartof Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.965-977
issn 0146-1672
1552-7433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71670570
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Culture
Discrepancies
Humans
Impression formation
Incremental theory
Individual differences
Individuality
Interpersonal Relations
Intuition
Job performance
Lay conceptions
Pathology
Personality
Personality Development
Personality tests
Short term
Stereotypes
Stereotyping
Students - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A16%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Person%20Theories:%20Their%20Temporal%20Stability%20and%20Relation%20to%20Intertrait%20Inferences&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Poon,%20Connie%20S.%20K.&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=965&rft.epage=977&rft.pages=965-977&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0146167208316690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57237843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-22a35e558afaddfc1237883ad28503c97902b29f06934d87108161f06a9278e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928313400&rft_id=info:pmid/18469153&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0146167208316690&rfr_iscdi=true