Loading…

Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy provides more efficacy than ibuprofen and acetaminophen for acute low back pain

A prospective, randomized, single (investigator) blind, comparative efficacy trial was conducted. To compare the efficacy of continuous low-level heat wrap therapy (40 C, 8 hours/day) with that of ibuprofen (1200 mg/day) and acetaminophen (4000 mg/day) in subjects with acute nonspecific low back pai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2002-05, Vol.27 (10), p.1012-1017
Main Authors: NADLER, Scott F, STEINER, Deborah J, ERASALA, Geetha N, HENGEHOLD, David A, HINKLE, Robert T, GOODALE, Mary Beth, ABELN, Susan B, WEINGAND, Kurt W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A prospective, randomized, single (investigator) blind, comparative efficacy trial was conducted. To compare the efficacy of continuous low-level heat wrap therapy (40 C, 8 hours/day) with that of ibuprofen (1200 mg/day) and acetaminophen (4000 mg/day) in subjects with acute nonspecific low back pain. The efficacy of topical heat methods, as compared with oral analgesic treatment of low back pain, has not been established. Subjects (n = 371) were randomly assigned to heat wrap (n = 113), acetaminophen (n = 113), or ibuprofen (n = 106) for efficacy evaluation, or to oral placebo (n = 20) or unheated back wrap (n = 19) for blinding. Outcome measures included pain relief, muscle stiffness, lateral trunk flexibility, and disability. Efficacy was measured over two treatment days and two follow-up days. Day 1 pain relief for the heat wrap (mean, 2) was higher than for ibuprofen (mean, 1.51; P = 0.0007) or acetaminophen (mean, 1.32; P = 0.0001). Extended mean pain relief (Days 3 to 4) for the heat wrap (mean, 2.61) also was higher than for ibuprofen (mean, 1.68; P = 0.0001) or acetaminophen (mean, 1.95; P = 0.0009). Lateral trunk flexibility was improved with the heat wrap (mean change, 4.28 cm) during treatment (P
ISSN:0362-2436
1528-1159
DOI:10.1097/00007632-200205150-00003