A Comparison of an Electronic Version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the Standard Paper Version

• Published in: Quality of life research 2002-02, Vol.11 (1), p.19-26
• Main Authors: Ryan, Judy M, Corry, John R, Attewell, Robyn, Smithson, Michael J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Automatic Data Processing; Chronic Disease; Chronic pain; Computer software; Computers in education; Cross-Over Studies; Data Collection - methods; Data quality; Elders; Electronic paper; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Pain - psychology; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Software; Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Volunteerism
• ISSN: 0962-9343; 1573-2649
• DOI: 10.1023/A:1014415709997

Because of its sound psychometric properties the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire is used throughout the world, yet it is difficult to analyse and score. Using a newly developed software package, onto which any questionnaire can be loaded, we developed an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire. The purpose of this study is test the effect of the electronic mode of administration on the measurement properties of the SF-36. In a randomised cross-over design study 79 healthy individuals and 36 chronic pain patients completed both electronic and paper versions of the SF-36. Seventy-one percent preferred the electronic SF-36, 7% stated no preference, and 22% preferred the paper version. Completion time for the electronic SF-36 was slightly less, and there were no missing or problematical responses, whereas 44% of participants had at least one missing or problematical response in the paper version. Data entry and auditing time was 8 hours. There was less than 4% inter-version difference for any of the SF-36 sub-scales. The electronic SF-36 was well accepted and slightly quicker to complete than the paper version. We conclude that the electronic SF-36 is equivalent in performance and more effective than the paper version.