Loading…

Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice

We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2002-05, Vol.186 (5), p.S173-S180
Main Authors: Marmor, Theodore R., Krol, David M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33
container_end_page S180
container_issue 5
container_start_page S173
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 186
creator Marmor, Theodore R.
Krol, David M.
description We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71689947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937802701907</els_id><sourcerecordid>71689947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKBDEQRYMoOo5-gtIbRRetST_SFTci4gsGXKgbNyGdrmhkOj0mGcG_N_NAl66KC-dWFYeQA0bPGGX8_IlSWuSibOCEFqcNZYLmzQYZMSqanAOHTTL6RXbIbggfi1iIYpvssIIyBsBG5HWi2sFnM2Vd1iun3rBHF7OU4jtmL85G7LKnqCKGixQ79CEq11n3ljoxonchS3lJ2xDmmA0m0--D1bhHtoyaBtxfzzF5ub15vr7PJ493D9dXk1wXJbBctW2NnTE17wxnuqVthSVoUQNUtW4RDKsoN4IjAwbICxRUlABQQ1PUbVmOyfFq78wPn3MMUfY2aJxOlcNhHmTDOAhRNQmsV6D2QwgejZx52yv_LRmVC6lyKVUujMk0l1Llone4PjBve-z-WmuLCThaAypoNTVeOW3DH1dCzQWvEne54jDp-LLoZdAWncbOetRRdoP955UfCw-TBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71689947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Marmor, Theodore R. ; Krol, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Theodore R. ; Krol, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12011881</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; labor ; Labor pain ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrical techniques ; pain management ; Pregnancy ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-05, Vol.186 (5), p.S173-S180</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13856964$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12011881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Theodore R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)</description><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>labor</subject><subject>Labor pain</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrical techniques</subject><subject>pain management</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKBDEQRYMoOo5-gtIbRRetST_SFTci4gsGXKgbNyGdrmhkOj0mGcG_N_NAl66KC-dWFYeQA0bPGGX8_IlSWuSibOCEFqcNZYLmzQYZMSqanAOHTTL6RXbIbggfi1iIYpvssIIyBsBG5HWi2sFnM2Vd1iun3rBHF7OU4jtmL85G7LKnqCKGixQ79CEq11n3ljoxonchS3lJ2xDmmA0m0--D1bhHtoyaBtxfzzF5ub15vr7PJ493D9dXk1wXJbBctW2NnTE17wxnuqVthSVoUQNUtW4RDKsoN4IjAwbICxRUlABQQ1PUbVmOyfFq78wPn3MMUfY2aJxOlcNhHmTDOAhRNQmsV6D2QwgejZx52yv_LRmVC6lyKVUujMk0l1Llone4PjBve-z-WmuLCThaAypoNTVeOW3DH1dCzQWvEne54jDp-LLoZdAWncbOetRRdoP955UfCw-TBg</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Marmor, Theodore R.</creator><creator>Krol, David M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</title><author>Marmor, Theodore R. ; Krol, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>labor</topic><topic>Labor pain</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrical techniques</topic><topic>pain management</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Theodore R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marmor, Theodore R.</au><au>Krol, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>S173</spage><epage>S180</epage><pages>S173-S180</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>12011881</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-05, Vol.186 (5), p.S173-S180
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71689947
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
labor
Labor pain
Medical sciences
Obstetrical techniques
pain management
Pregnancy
United States
title Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Labor%20pain%20management%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20Understanding%20patterns%20and%20the%20issue%20of%20choice&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Marmor,%20Theodore%20R.&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=S173&rft.epage=S180&rft.pages=S173-S180&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71689947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71689947&rft_id=info:pmid/12011881&rfr_iscdi=true