Loading…
Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice
We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer,...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2002-05, Vol.186 (5), p.S173-S180 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33 |
container_end_page | S180 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | S173 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Marmor, Theodore R. Krol, David M. |
description | We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71689947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937802701907</els_id><sourcerecordid>71689947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKBDEQRYMoOo5-gtIbRRetST_SFTci4gsGXKgbNyGdrmhkOj0mGcG_N_NAl66KC-dWFYeQA0bPGGX8_IlSWuSibOCEFqcNZYLmzQYZMSqanAOHTTL6RXbIbggfi1iIYpvssIIyBsBG5HWi2sFnM2Vd1iun3rBHF7OU4jtmL85G7LKnqCKGixQ79CEq11n3ljoxonchS3lJ2xDmmA0m0--D1bhHtoyaBtxfzzF5ub15vr7PJ493D9dXk1wXJbBctW2NnTE17wxnuqVthSVoUQNUtW4RDKsoN4IjAwbICxRUlABQQ1PUbVmOyfFq78wPn3MMUfY2aJxOlcNhHmTDOAhRNQmsV6D2QwgejZx52yv_LRmVC6lyKVUujMk0l1Llone4PjBve-z-WmuLCThaAypoNTVeOW3DH1dCzQWvEne54jDp-LLoZdAWncbOetRRdoP955UfCw-TBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71689947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Marmor, Theodore R. ; Krol, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Theodore R. ; Krol, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12011881</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; labor ; Labor pain ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrical techniques ; pain management ; Pregnancy ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-05, Vol.186 (5), p.S173-S180</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13856964$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12011881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Theodore R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)</description><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>labor</subject><subject>Labor pain</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrical techniques</subject><subject>pain management</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKBDEQRYMoOo5-gtIbRRetST_SFTci4gsGXKgbNyGdrmhkOj0mGcG_N_NAl66KC-dWFYeQA0bPGGX8_IlSWuSibOCEFqcNZYLmzQYZMSqanAOHTTL6RXbIbggfi1iIYpvssIIyBsBG5HWi2sFnM2Vd1iun3rBHF7OU4jtmL85G7LKnqCKGixQ79CEq11n3ljoxonchS3lJ2xDmmA0m0--D1bhHtoyaBtxfzzF5ub15vr7PJ493D9dXk1wXJbBctW2NnTE17wxnuqVthSVoUQNUtW4RDKsoN4IjAwbICxRUlABQQ1PUbVmOyfFq78wPn3MMUfY2aJxOlcNhHmTDOAhRNQmsV6D2QwgejZx52yv_LRmVC6lyKVUujMk0l1Llone4PjBve-z-WmuLCThaAypoNTVeOW3DH1dCzQWvEne54jDp-LLoZdAWncbOetRRdoP955UfCw-TBg</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Marmor, Theodore R.</creator><creator>Krol, David M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</title><author>Marmor, Theodore R. ; Krol, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>labor</topic><topic>Labor pain</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrical techniques</topic><topic>pain management</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Theodore R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marmor, Theodore R.</au><au>Krol, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>S173</spage><epage>S180</epage><pages>S173-S180</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>We reviewed a considerable body of literature in an attempt to characterize the patterns of managing pain in US childbirth. In doing so, we noted the relatively restricted range of choice most US women have in this situation and the limited amount of information available about what US women prefer, the reasons for their preferences, and what influences them. What is clear is that the range of choice available is substantially narrower than in many of the advanced industrial democracies of Western Europe. The reasons for this include professional training, economic rewards, staffing constraints, and understandable inclinations to avoid pain. What is not clear is what could be done to increase women's choices. Simply supplying more information, however accurate, will surely be inadequate. Changes in training programs could make a difference, as would shifts in payment. There are, however, deeper cultural forces at work that are less open to direction. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>12011881</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-05, Vol.186 (5), p.S173-S180 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71689947 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods Biological and medical sciences Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans labor Labor pain Medical sciences Obstetrical techniques pain management Pregnancy United States |
title | Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Labor%20pain%20management%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20Understanding%20patterns%20and%20the%20issue%20of%20choice&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Marmor,%20Theodore%20R.&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=S173&rft.epage=S180&rft.pages=S173-S180&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70190-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71689947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2381-abb5edff56df61cb0b4e38c958845cbe8f1406f96e1818e62e909388858725b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71689947&rft_id=info:pmid/12011881&rfr_iscdi=true |