Loading…

Evaluation of transforaminal ligaments by magnetic resonance imaging

Objectives: Three-part study to (1) identify and describe transforaminal ligaments (TFLs), (2) determine the best low-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for TFLs, and (3) determine the ability of low-field-strength MRI to obtain images of TFLs. Design: Part I—descriptive anato...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2002-05, Vol.25 (4), p.199-208
Main Authors: Cramer, Gregory D., Skogsbergh, Dennis R., Bakkum, Barclay W., Winterstein, James F., Yu, ShiWei, Tuck, Nathaniel R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: Three-part study to (1) identify and describe transforaminal ligaments (TFLs), (2) determine the best low-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for TFLs, and (3) determine the ability of low-field-strength MRI to obtain images of TFLs. Design: Part I—descriptive anatomic study; part II—descriptive MRI study; part III—blinded comparison of diagnostic test against gold standard (MRI vs anatomic dissection). Setting: Chiropractic college gross anatomy laboratory and MRI facilities. Specimens: Three anatomic specimens of male cadavers age 60 to 85 years; a fourth specimen was used for training radiologists in part III. Main Outcome Measures: Part I—number and size of TFLs; part II—subjective grading of highest quality MRI images; part III—specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, percent agreement, and accuracy of identifying TFLs from MRI scans. Main Results: Part I—19 TFLs identified in 30 intervertebral foramina (IVFs) (60% of IVFs had TFLs), thick = 4 (21%), medium thickness = 12 (63.2%), thin = 3 (15.8%); part II—TFLs demonstrated to best advantage with pure sagittal plane, T1-weighted MRI; part III—average: specificity = 88.9%, sensitivity = 45.6%, positive predictive value = 86.7%, negative predictive value = 50.8%, percent agreement = 78%, and accuracy = 62.4%. Conclusions: The number of TFLs was in general agreement with previous research. Images of TFLs can be successfully imaged with low-field-strength MRI. If a trained radiologist identifies a TFL, there is an 87% chance that one is present, and if a trained radiologist does not identify a TFL in an intervertebral foramen, there remains a 51% chance that one is present. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:199-208)
ISSN:0161-4754
1532-6586
DOI:10.1067/mmt.2002.123174