Loading…
Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies
Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2004-03, Vol.51 (3), p.631-634 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3 |
container_end_page | 634 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 631 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Smith, M.R. Lu, H. Trochet, S. Frayne, R. |
description | Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.20006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71709368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71709368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3DAURi3UqgzQRf8A8qpSF4Hr2J7EywrKQ2KgGl4rZDnONRjyGGyHx79v2pnCqurqbs53rnQI-cJghwHku21od3IAmK6RCZN5nuVSiQ9kAoWAjDMl1slGjPcjoVQhPpF1JgFECWpCbubY9k--u6XpDik6hzbR3tHzq31qmts--HTXektNSN4ZmyJdBIzYJeo7-jiYLvlkkn9COpvTBQY3RN93NKah9hi3yEdnmoifV3eTXB78uNg7yk7ODo_3vp9kVig2zTB3TqDjgo_vkVllXSWrWolSCGGkkRKN5QxcZSWral6WhhteF6bOHdjK8k3ydeldhP5xwJh066PFpjEd9kPUBStA8Wn5X5AVoxw4jOC3JWhDH2NApxfBtya8agb6d3Q9Rtd_oo_s9ko6VC3W7-Sq8gjsLoFn3-Drv016Np_9VWbLhY8JX94WJjzoacELqa9PD_U13_95dSq4nvFfuXicwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17388030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Smith, M.R. ; Lu, H. ; Trochet, S. ; Frayne, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.R. ; Lu, H. ; Trochet, S. ; Frayne, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15004809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays ; blood flow ; Brain Ischemia - physiopathology ; Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Contrast Media ; Fourier Analysis ; Gadolinium DTPA ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; magnetic resonance perfusion studies ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Phantoms, Imaging ; reformulated SVD algorithm ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stroke - physiopathology ; SVD deconvolution artifacts ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2004-03, Vol.51 (3), p.631-634</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15004809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trochet, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frayne, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays</subject><subject>blood flow</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>magnetic resonance perfusion studies</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>reformulated SVD algorithm</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>SVD deconvolution artifacts</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtP3DAURi3UqgzQRf8A8qpSF4Hr2J7EywrKQ2KgGl4rZDnONRjyGGyHx79v2pnCqurqbs53rnQI-cJghwHku21od3IAmK6RCZN5nuVSiQ9kAoWAjDMl1slGjPcjoVQhPpF1JgFECWpCbubY9k--u6XpDik6hzbR3tHzq31qmts--HTXektNSN4ZmyJdBIzYJeo7-jiYLvlkkn9COpvTBQY3RN93NKah9hi3yEdnmoifV3eTXB78uNg7yk7ODo_3vp9kVig2zTB3TqDjgo_vkVllXSWrWolSCGGkkRKN5QxcZSWral6WhhteF6bOHdjK8k3ydeldhP5xwJh066PFpjEd9kPUBStA8Wn5X5AVoxw4jOC3JWhDH2NApxfBtya8agb6d3Q9Rtd_oo_s9ko6VC3W7-Sq8gjsLoFn3-Drv016Np_9VWbLhY8JX94WJjzoacELqa9PD_U13_95dSq4nvFfuXicwA</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Smith, M.R.</creator><creator>Lu, H.</creator><creator>Trochet, S.</creator><creator>Frayne, R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</title><author>Smith, M.R. ; Lu, H. ; Trochet, S. ; Frayne, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays</topic><topic>blood flow</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>magnetic resonance perfusion studies</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>reformulated SVD algorithm</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>SVD deconvolution artifacts</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trochet, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frayne, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, M.R.</au><au>Lu, H.</au><au>Trochet, S.</au><au>Frayne, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>634</epage><pages>631-634</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15004809</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.20006</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2004-03, Vol.51 (3), p.631-634 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71709368 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Algorithms arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays blood flow Brain Ischemia - physiopathology Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology Computer Simulation Contrast Media Fourier Analysis Gadolinium DTPA Humans Image Enhancement - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods magnetic resonance perfusion studies Middle Aged Models, Theoretical Phantoms, Imaging reformulated SVD algorithm Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Stroke - physiopathology SVD deconvolution artifacts Time Factors |
title | Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A55%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removing%20the%20effect%20of%20SVD%20algorithmic%20artifacts%20present%20in%20quantitative%20MR%20perfusion%20studies&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Smith,%20M.R.&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=634&rft.pages=631-634&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.20006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71709368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17388030&rft_id=info:pmid/15004809&rfr_iscdi=true |