Loading…

Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies

Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2004-03, Vol.51 (3), p.631-634
Main Authors: Smith, M.R., Lu, H., Trochet, S., Frayne, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3
container_end_page 634
container_issue 3
container_start_page 631
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 51
creator Smith, M.R.
Lu, H.
Trochet, S.
Frayne, R.
description Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.20006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71709368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71709368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3DAURi3UqgzQRf8A8qpSF4Hr2J7EywrKQ2KgGl4rZDnONRjyGGyHx79v2pnCqurqbs53rnQI-cJghwHku21od3IAmK6RCZN5nuVSiQ9kAoWAjDMl1slGjPcjoVQhPpF1JgFECWpCbubY9k--u6XpDik6hzbR3tHzq31qmts--HTXektNSN4ZmyJdBIzYJeo7-jiYLvlkkn9COpvTBQY3RN93NKah9hi3yEdnmoifV3eTXB78uNg7yk7ODo_3vp9kVig2zTB3TqDjgo_vkVllXSWrWolSCGGkkRKN5QxcZSWral6WhhteF6bOHdjK8k3ydeldhP5xwJh066PFpjEd9kPUBStA8Wn5X5AVoxw4jOC3JWhDH2NApxfBtya8agb6d3Q9Rtd_oo_s9ko6VC3W7-Sq8gjsLoFn3-Drv016Np_9VWbLhY8JX94WJjzoacELqa9PD_U13_95dSq4nvFfuXicwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17388030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Smith, M.R. ; Lu, H. ; Trochet, S. ; Frayne, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.R. ; Lu, H. ; Trochet, S. ; Frayne, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15004809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays ; blood flow ; Brain Ischemia - physiopathology ; Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Contrast Media ; Fourier Analysis ; Gadolinium DTPA ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; magnetic resonance perfusion studies ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Phantoms, Imaging ; reformulated SVD algorithm ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stroke - physiopathology ; SVD deconvolution artifacts ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2004-03, Vol.51 (3), p.631-634</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15004809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trochet, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frayne, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays</subject><subject>blood flow</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>magnetic resonance perfusion studies</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>reformulated SVD algorithm</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>SVD deconvolution artifacts</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtP3DAURi3UqgzQRf8A8qpSF4Hr2J7EywrKQ2KgGl4rZDnONRjyGGyHx79v2pnCqurqbs53rnQI-cJghwHku21od3IAmK6RCZN5nuVSiQ9kAoWAjDMl1slGjPcjoVQhPpF1JgFECWpCbubY9k--u6XpDik6hzbR3tHzq31qmts--HTXektNSN4ZmyJdBIzYJeo7-jiYLvlkkn9COpvTBQY3RN93NKah9hi3yEdnmoifV3eTXB78uNg7yk7ODo_3vp9kVig2zTB3TqDjgo_vkVllXSWrWolSCGGkkRKN5QxcZSWral6WhhteF6bOHdjK8k3ydeldhP5xwJh066PFpjEd9kPUBStA8Wn5X5AVoxw4jOC3JWhDH2NApxfBtya8agb6d3Q9Rtd_oo_s9ko6VC3W7-Sq8gjsLoFn3-Drv016Np_9VWbLhY8JX94WJjzoacELqa9PD_U13_95dSq4nvFfuXicwA</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Smith, M.R.</creator><creator>Lu, H.</creator><creator>Trochet, S.</creator><creator>Frayne, R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</title><author>Smith, M.R. ; Lu, H. ; Trochet, S. ; Frayne, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays</topic><topic>blood flow</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>magnetic resonance perfusion studies</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>reformulated SVD algorithm</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>SVD deconvolution artifacts</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trochet, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frayne, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, M.R.</au><au>Lu, H.</au><au>Trochet, S.</au><au>Frayne, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>634</epage><pages>631-634</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values can be obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion studies using the standard singular value decomposition (sSVD) deconvolution algorithm. Reports in the literature from simulation and in vivo studies suggest that CBF estimates obtained using sSVD deconvolution depend on the arterial‐tissue delay (ATD). By contrast, Fourier transform (FT) deconvolution produces CBF estimates that are independent of ATD. The diagnostic reliability of quantitative CBF measurements to define areas of normal tissue flow and tissue at risk is brought into doubt by such gross sensitivity to the specifics of the deconvolution approach. This variation of CBF values with ATD is shown to be an artifact associated with the current implementation of the sSVD deconvolution algorithm. A reformulated version of the SVD deconvolution algorithm (rSVD) is presented and compared to the standard SVD algorithm through simulation and patient case studies. Magn Reson Med 51:631–634, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15004809</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.20006</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2004-03, Vol.51 (3), p.631-634
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71709368
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Algorithms
arterial and tissue perfusion curves delays
blood flow
Brain Ischemia - physiopathology
Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology
Computer Simulation
Contrast Media
Fourier Analysis
Gadolinium DTPA
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
magnetic resonance perfusion studies
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Phantoms, Imaging
reformulated SVD algorithm
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stroke - physiopathology
SVD deconvolution artifacts
Time Factors
title Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A55%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removing%20the%20effect%20of%20SVD%20algorithmic%20artifacts%20present%20in%20quantitative%20MR%20perfusion%20studies&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Smith,%20M.R.&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=634&rft.pages=631-634&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.20006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71709368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-e2ff4ef343fece1c9cfb5bd948444a5a55eac310fbc51bd388a3a3d7ad2f0cbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17388030&rft_id=info:pmid/15004809&rfr_iscdi=true