Assessing risk using different cholesterol-screening methods

The purpose of this study was to compare total capillary, total venous, risk ratio, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein measures of cholesterol to determine whether total capillary cholesterol is a valid measure to use in cholesterol screening. An announcement and a registration for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public health (London) 2004-04, Vol.118 (3), p.225-229
Main Authors: Bowden, R.G, Kingery, P.M, Rust, D.M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Cholesterol
Cholesterol, HDL - blood
Cholesterol, LDL - blood
Female
Health Promotion
High-density lipoprotein
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia - blood
Hypercholesterolemia - diagnosis
Low-density lipoprotein
Male
Middle Aged
Public Health
Risk Assessment
Screening
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a3e89cf6cabbf34407a1ad977298c52507d7ace79a9fea25ba0812c1cb8b38aa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a3e89cf6cabbf34407a1ad977298c52507d7ace79a9fea25ba0812c1cb8b38aa3
container_end_page 229
container_issue 3
container_start_page 225
container_title Public health (London)
container_volume 118
creator Bowden, R.G
Kingery, P.M
Rust, D.M
description The purpose of this study was to compare total capillary, total venous, risk ratio, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein measures of cholesterol to determine whether total capillary cholesterol is a valid measure to use in cholesterol screening. An announcement and a registration form were distributed with employee paychecks announcing a cholesterol-screening programme. Capillary and venous samples were collected from screening participants ( n=285). Results indicated false negatives in total capillary cholesterol in 17.21–34.4% of cases compared with other methods of cholesterol measurement. Due to the high number of misclassifications, health educators should not use total capillary cholesterol as a predictor of risk for heart disease, nor as a measure for referral during cholesterol screenings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.07.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71711327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0033350603001859</els_id><sourcerecordid>71711327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a3e89cf6cabbf34407a1ad977298c52507d7ace79a9fea25ba0812c1cb8b38aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AQ_Sk7fE2d0km0AvpfgPCl70vGw2E7s1TepOIvjt3diCN08z8N485v0Yu-YQc-DZ3TbeDxuMBYCMQcUA_IRNeaKyKM14dsqmQZCRTCGbsAuiLQAIJdNzNuFpkBIupmyxJEIi177PvaOP-fC7Vq6u0WPbz-2ma5B69F0TkfWI7ajvsN90FV2ys9o0hFfHOWNvD_evq6do_fL4vFquIytT0UdGYl7YOrOmLGuZJKAMN1WhlChym4oUVKWMRVWYokYj0tJAzoXltsxLmRsjZ-z2kLv33ecQ3tE7RxabxrTYDaQVV5zL0G3GxMFofUfksdZ773bGf2sOemSmt3pkpkdmGpQOzMLRzTF9KHdY_Z0cIQXD4mDA0PHLoddkHbYWK-fR9rrq3H_5P3kiflk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71711327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing risk using different cholesterol-screening methods</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Bowden, R.G ; Kingery, P.M ; Rust, D.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowden, R.G ; Kingery, P.M ; Rust, D.M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare total capillary, total venous, risk ratio, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein measures of cholesterol to determine whether total capillary cholesterol is a valid measure to use in cholesterol screening. An announcement and a registration form were distributed with employee paychecks announcing a cholesterol-screening programme. Capillary and venous samples were collected from screening participants ( n=285). Results indicated false negatives in total capillary cholesterol in 17.21–34.4% of cases compared with other methods of cholesterol measurement. Due to the high number of misclassifications, health educators should not use total capillary cholesterol as a predictor of risk for heart disease, nor as a measure for referral during cholesterol screenings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.07.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15003412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cholesterol ; Cholesterol, HDL - blood ; Cholesterol, LDL - blood ; Female ; Health Promotion ; High-density lipoprotein ; Humans ; Hypercholesterolemia - blood ; Hypercholesterolemia - diagnosis ; Low-density lipoprotein ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Public Health ; Risk Assessment ; Screening ; United States</subject><ispartof>Public health (London), 2004-04, Vol.118 (3), p.225-229</ispartof><rights>2003 The Royal Institute of Public Health</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a3e89cf6cabbf34407a1ad977298c52507d7ace79a9fea25ba0812c1cb8b38aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a3e89cf6cabbf34407a1ad977298c52507d7ace79a9fea25ba0812c1cb8b38aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15003412$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowden, R.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingery, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, D.M</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing risk using different cholesterol-screening methods</title><title>Public health (London)</title><addtitle>Public Health</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare total capillary, total venous, risk ratio, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein measures of cholesterol to determine whether total capillary cholesterol is a valid measure to use in cholesterol screening. An announcement and a registration form were distributed with employee paychecks announcing a cholesterol-screening programme. Capillary and venous samples were collected from screening participants ( n=285). Results indicated false negatives in total capillary cholesterol in 17.21–34.4% of cases compared with other methods of cholesterol measurement. Due to the high number of misclassifications, health educators should not use total capillary cholesterol as a predictor of risk for heart disease, nor as a measure for referral during cholesterol screenings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Cholesterol, HDL - blood</subject><subject>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>High-density lipoprotein</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypercholesterolemia - blood</subject><subject>Hypercholesterolemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Low-density lipoprotein</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0033-3506</issn><issn>1476-5616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AQ_Sk7fE2d0km0AvpfgPCl70vGw2E7s1TepOIvjt3diCN08z8N485v0Yu-YQc-DZ3TbeDxuMBYCMQcUA_IRNeaKyKM14dsqmQZCRTCGbsAuiLQAIJdNzNuFpkBIupmyxJEIi177PvaOP-fC7Vq6u0WPbz-2ma5B69F0TkfWI7ajvsN90FV2ys9o0hFfHOWNvD_evq6do_fL4vFquIytT0UdGYl7YOrOmLGuZJKAMN1WhlChym4oUVKWMRVWYokYj0tJAzoXltsxLmRsjZ-z2kLv33ecQ3tE7RxabxrTYDaQVV5zL0G3GxMFofUfksdZ773bGf2sOemSmt3pkpkdmGpQOzMLRzTF9KHdY_Z0cIQXD4mDA0PHLoddkHbYWK-fR9rrq3H_5P3kiflk</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Bowden, R.G</creator><creator>Kingery, P.M</creator><creator>Rust, D.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>Assessing risk using different cholesterol-screening methods</title><author>Bowden, R.G ; Kingery, P.M ; Rust, D.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a3e89cf6cabbf34407a1ad977298c52507d7ace79a9fea25ba0812c1cb8b38aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Cholesterol, HDL - blood</topic><topic>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>High-density lipoprotein</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypercholesterolemia - blood</topic><topic>Hypercholesterolemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Low-density lipoprotein</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowden, R.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingery, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, D.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public health (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowden, R.G</au><au>Kingery, P.M</au><au>Rust, D.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing risk using different cholesterol-screening methods</atitle><jtitle>Public health (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health</addtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>225-229</pages><issn>0033-3506</issn><eissn>1476-5616</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare total capillary, total venous, risk ratio, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein measures of cholesterol to determine whether total capillary cholesterol is a valid measure to use in cholesterol screening. An announcement and a registration form were distributed with employee paychecks announcing a cholesterol-screening programme. Capillary and venous samples were collected from screening participants ( n=285). Results indicated false negatives in total capillary cholesterol in 17.21–34.4% of cases compared with other methods of cholesterol measurement. Due to the high number of misclassifications, health educators should not use total capillary cholesterol as a predictor of risk for heart disease, nor as a measure for referral during cholesterol screenings.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15003412</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.puhe.2003.07.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3506
ispartof Public health (London), 2004-04, Vol.118 (3), p.225-229
issn 0033-3506
1476-5616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71711327
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Cholesterol
Cholesterol, HDL - blood
Cholesterol, LDL - blood
Female
Health Promotion
High-density lipoprotein
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia - blood
Hypercholesterolemia - diagnosis
Low-density lipoprotein
Male
Middle Aged
Public Health
Risk Assessment
Screening
United States
title Assessing risk using different cholesterol-screening methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20risk%20using%20different%20cholesterol-screening%20methods&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20(London)&rft.au=Bowden,%20R.G&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=225-229&rft.issn=0033-3506&rft.eissn=1476-5616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.puhe.2003.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71711327%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a3e89cf6cabbf34407a1ad977298c52507d7ace79a9fea25ba0812c1cb8b38aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71711327&rft_id=info:pmid/15003412&rfr_iscdi=true