Loading…
Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb
Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult...
Saved in:
Published in: | BioEssays 2002-05, Vol.24 (5), p.460-465 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23 |
container_end_page | 465 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 460 |
container_title | BioEssays |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Cohn, M.J. Lovejoy, C.O. Wolpert, L. Coates, M.I. |
description | Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bies.10088 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71715926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71715926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE-P0zAQxS20K1oWLnwA5NMeVgRsJ7FjbttuKStVIPFHIC7WOJm2ZpM0a7vQfnvSprvcOM3o6feeZh4hLzl7wxkTb63DcNiK4gkZ81zwhBeqOCNjJmSeaJGpEXkWwi_GmJYie0pGXDDGhdRjAhMPbbl27eo1DbhqsI0Q3aal0FY0rpE2GKGL6PcrBzWFnQvvaAexV1r6G33YBtr5TYkhUNceHb0a0XqISGvX2OfkfAl1wBeneUG-vZ99nX5IFp_mt9PrRVJmQhdJLmzFEbSsBMtQKAChq7RMZZWxVOVSlyCrSlvQinML2dJCLkuF2uo0S1GkF-RyyO3Pud9iiKZxocS6hhY322AUVzzXQvbg1QCWfhOCx6XpvGvA7w1n5lCoORRqjoX28KtT6tY2WP1DTw32AB-AP67G_X-izOR29uUhNBk8LkTcPXrA3xmp-mfN949zk6Xq52d988Ow9C8nFZDv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71715926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Cohn, M.J. ; Lovejoy, C.O. ; Wolpert, L. ; Coates, M.I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohn, M.J. ; Lovejoy, C.O. ; Wolpert, L. ; Coates, M.I.</creatorcontrib><description>Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-9247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-1878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bies.10088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12001269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Body Patterning ; Cartilage - physiology ; Chick Embryo ; Extremities - embryology ; Fishes ; Wings, Animal - embryology</subject><ispartof>BioEssays, 2002-05, Vol.24 (5), p.460-465</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12001269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohn, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, M.I.</creatorcontrib><title>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</title><title>BioEssays</title><addtitle>Bioessays</addtitle><description>Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Patterning</subject><subject>Cartilage - physiology</subject><subject>Chick Embryo</subject><subject>Extremities - embryology</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Wings, Animal - embryology</subject><issn>0265-9247</issn><issn>1521-1878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE-P0zAQxS20K1oWLnwA5NMeVgRsJ7FjbttuKStVIPFHIC7WOJm2ZpM0a7vQfnvSprvcOM3o6feeZh4hLzl7wxkTb63DcNiK4gkZ81zwhBeqOCNjJmSeaJGpEXkWwi_GmJYie0pGXDDGhdRjAhMPbbl27eo1DbhqsI0Q3aal0FY0rpE2GKGL6PcrBzWFnQvvaAexV1r6G33YBtr5TYkhUNceHb0a0XqISGvX2OfkfAl1wBeneUG-vZ99nX5IFp_mt9PrRVJmQhdJLmzFEbSsBMtQKAChq7RMZZWxVOVSlyCrSlvQinML2dJCLkuF2uo0S1GkF-RyyO3Pud9iiKZxocS6hhY322AUVzzXQvbg1QCWfhOCx6XpvGvA7w1n5lCoORRqjoX28KtT6tY2WP1DTw32AB-AP67G_X-izOR29uUhNBk8LkTcPXrA3xmp-mfN949zk6Xq52d988Ow9C8nFZDv</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Cohn, M.J.</creator><creator>Lovejoy, C.O.</creator><creator>Wolpert, L.</creator><creator>Coates, M.I.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</title><author>Cohn, M.J. ; Lovejoy, C.O. ; Wolpert, L. ; Coates, M.I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Patterning</topic><topic>Cartilage - physiology</topic><topic>Chick Embryo</topic><topic>Extremities - embryology</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Wings, Animal - embryology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohn, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, M.I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BioEssays</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohn, M.J.</au><au>Lovejoy, C.O.</au><au>Wolpert, L.</au><au>Coates, M.I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</atitle><jtitle>BioEssays</jtitle><addtitle>Bioessays</addtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>460-465</pages><issn>0265-9247</issn><eissn>1521-1878</eissn><abstract>Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12001269</pmid><doi>10.1002/bies.10088</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0265-9247 |
ispartof | BioEssays, 2002-05, Vol.24 (5), p.460-465 |
issn | 0265-9247 1521-1878 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71715926 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animals Body Patterning Cartilage - physiology Chick Embryo Extremities - embryology Fishes Wings, Animal - embryology |
title | Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Branching,%20segmentation%20and%20the%20metapterygial%20axis:%20pattern%20versus%20process%20in%20the%20vertebrate%20limb&rft.jtitle=BioEssays&rft.au=Cohn,%20M.J.&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=460-465&rft.issn=0265-9247&rft.eissn=1521-1878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bies.10088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71715926%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71715926&rft_id=info:pmid/12001269&rfr_iscdi=true |