Loading…

Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb

Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BioEssays 2002-05, Vol.24 (5), p.460-465
Main Authors: Cohn, M.J., Lovejoy, C.O., Wolpert, L., Coates, M.I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23
container_end_page 465
container_issue 5
container_start_page 460
container_title BioEssays
container_volume 24
creator Cohn, M.J.
Lovejoy, C.O.
Wolpert, L.
Coates, M.I.
description Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bies.10088
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71715926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71715926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE-P0zAQxS20K1oWLnwA5NMeVgRsJ7FjbttuKStVIPFHIC7WOJm2ZpM0a7vQfnvSprvcOM3o6feeZh4hLzl7wxkTb63DcNiK4gkZ81zwhBeqOCNjJmSeaJGpEXkWwi_GmJYie0pGXDDGhdRjAhMPbbl27eo1DbhqsI0Q3aal0FY0rpE2GKGL6PcrBzWFnQvvaAexV1r6G33YBtr5TYkhUNceHb0a0XqISGvX2OfkfAl1wBeneUG-vZ99nX5IFp_mt9PrRVJmQhdJLmzFEbSsBMtQKAChq7RMZZWxVOVSlyCrSlvQinML2dJCLkuF2uo0S1GkF-RyyO3Pud9iiKZxocS6hhY322AUVzzXQvbg1QCWfhOCx6XpvGvA7w1n5lCoORRqjoX28KtT6tY2WP1DTw32AB-AP67G_X-izOR29uUhNBk8LkTcPXrA3xmp-mfN949zk6Xq52d988Ow9C8nFZDv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71715926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Cohn, M.J. ; Lovejoy, C.O. ; Wolpert, L. ; Coates, M.I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohn, M.J. ; Lovejoy, C.O. ; Wolpert, L. ; Coates, M.I.</creatorcontrib><description>Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-9247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-1878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bies.10088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12001269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Body Patterning ; Cartilage - physiology ; Chick Embryo ; Extremities - embryology ; Fishes ; Wings, Animal - embryology</subject><ispartof>BioEssays, 2002-05, Vol.24 (5), p.460-465</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12001269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohn, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, M.I.</creatorcontrib><title>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</title><title>BioEssays</title><addtitle>Bioessays</addtitle><description>Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Patterning</subject><subject>Cartilage - physiology</subject><subject>Chick Embryo</subject><subject>Extremities - embryology</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Wings, Animal - embryology</subject><issn>0265-9247</issn><issn>1521-1878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE-P0zAQxS20K1oWLnwA5NMeVgRsJ7FjbttuKStVIPFHIC7WOJm2ZpM0a7vQfnvSprvcOM3o6feeZh4hLzl7wxkTb63DcNiK4gkZ81zwhBeqOCNjJmSeaJGpEXkWwi_GmJYie0pGXDDGhdRjAhMPbbl27eo1DbhqsI0Q3aal0FY0rpE2GKGL6PcrBzWFnQvvaAexV1r6G33YBtr5TYkhUNceHb0a0XqISGvX2OfkfAl1wBeneUG-vZ99nX5IFp_mt9PrRVJmQhdJLmzFEbSsBMtQKAChq7RMZZWxVOVSlyCrSlvQinML2dJCLkuF2uo0S1GkF-RyyO3Pud9iiKZxocS6hhY322AUVzzXQvbg1QCWfhOCx6XpvGvA7w1n5lCoORRqjoX28KtT6tY2WP1DTw32AB-AP67G_X-izOR29uUhNBk8LkTcPXrA3xmp-mfN949zk6Xq52d988Ow9C8nFZDv</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Cohn, M.J.</creator><creator>Lovejoy, C.O.</creator><creator>Wolpert, L.</creator><creator>Coates, M.I.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</title><author>Cohn, M.J. ; Lovejoy, C.O. ; Wolpert, L. ; Coates, M.I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Patterning</topic><topic>Cartilage - physiology</topic><topic>Chick Embryo</topic><topic>Extremities - embryology</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Wings, Animal - embryology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohn, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, M.I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BioEssays</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohn, M.J.</au><au>Lovejoy, C.O.</au><au>Wolpert, L.</au><au>Coates, M.I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb</atitle><jtitle>BioEssays</jtitle><addtitle>Bioessays</addtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>460-465</pages><issn>0265-9247</issn><eissn>1521-1878</eissn><abstract>Explanations of the patterns of vertebrate fin and limb evolution are improving as specific hypotheses based on molecular and developmental data are proposed and tested. Comparative analyses of gene expression patterns and functions in developing limbs, and morphological patterns in embryonic, adult and fossil limbs point to digit specification as a key developmental innovation associated with the origin of tetrapods. Digit development during the fin‐to‐limb transition involved sustained proximodistal outgrowth and a new phase of Hox gene expression in the distal fin bud. These patterning changes in the distal limb have been explained by the linked concepts of the metapterygial axis and the digital arch. These have been proposed to account for the generation of limb pattern by sequential branching and segmentation of precartilagenous elements along the proximodistal axis of the limb. While these ideas have been very fruitful, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with experimental and comparative studies of fin and limb development. Here we argue that limb development does not involve a branching mechanism, and reassess the concept of a metapterygial axis in limb development and evolution. BioEssays 24:460–465, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12001269</pmid><doi>10.1002/bies.10088</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-9247
ispartof BioEssays, 2002-05, Vol.24 (5), p.460-465
issn 0265-9247
1521-1878
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71715926
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
Body Patterning
Cartilage - physiology
Chick Embryo
Extremities - embryology
Fishes
Wings, Animal - embryology
title Branching, segmentation and the metapterygial axis: pattern versus process in the vertebrate limb
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Branching,%20segmentation%20and%20the%20metapterygial%20axis:%20pattern%20versus%20process%20in%20the%20vertebrate%20limb&rft.jtitle=BioEssays&rft.au=Cohn,%20M.J.&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=460-465&rft.issn=0265-9247&rft.eissn=1521-1878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bies.10088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71715926%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4298-52bd1ea96d204e27aa29d3c36d4037569ca6dd9ba9711ba4fba56c7e9b9343e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71715926&rft_id=info:pmid/12001269&rfr_iscdi=true