Loading…

The Clinical Effect of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Gingival Thickness and Root Coverage Compared to Coronally Positioned Flap Alone

Background: The primary aim of this randomized, controlled, blinded, clinical investigation was to compare the coronally positioned flap (CPF) plus an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft to CPF alone to determine their effect on gingival thickness and percent root coverage. Methods: Twenty‐four...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 2004-01, Vol.75 (1), p.44-56
Main Authors: Woodyard, James G., Greenwell, Henry, Hill, Margaret, Drisko, Connie, Iasella, John M., Scheetz, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The primary aim of this randomized, controlled, blinded, clinical investigation was to compare the coronally positioned flap (CPF) plus an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft to CPF alone to determine their effect on gingival thickness and percent root coverage. Methods: Twenty‐four subjects with one Miller Class I or II buccal recession defect of ≥3 mm were treated with a CPF plus ADM or a CPF alone. Multiple additional recession sites were treated with the same flap procedure, and all sites were studied for 6 months. Tissue thickness was measured at the sulcus base and at the mucogingival junction of all teeth, with an SDM ultrasonic gingival thickness meter. Results: For the ADM sites, mean initial recession of 3.46 mm was reduced to 0.04 mm for defect coverage of 3.42 mm or 99% ( P
ISSN:0022-3492
1943-3670
DOI:10.1902/jop.2004.75.1.44