Loading…
Sensitivity of the HEp-2000 substrate for the detection of anti-SSA/Ro60 antibodies
Anti-SSA/Ro antibodies are the most prevalent type of antinuclear antibody (ANA). Anti-SSA/ Ro-positive sera may recognise two proteins: a 52 kDa (Ro52) and a 60 kDa (Ro60) subunit. We studied the sensitivity for Ro60 detection using the HEp-2000 substrate, which consists of HEp-2 cells transfected...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical rheumatology 2000-01, Vol.19 (4), p.291-295 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Anti-SSA/Ro antibodies are the most prevalent type of antinuclear antibody (ANA). Anti-SSA/ Ro-positive sera may recognise two proteins: a 52 kDa (Ro52) and a 60 kDa (Ro60) subunit. We studied the sensitivity for Ro60 detection using the HEp-2000 substrate, which consists of HEp-2 cells transfected with Ro60 cDNA in an anti-SSA/Ro-positive population consecutively identified by double immunodiffusion (DID) with thymus/spleen nuclear extract and line immunoassay (LIA) with recombinant Ro52 and Ro60. One hundred and twenty-seven consecutive anti-SSA/Ro-positive sera defined by DID with thymus/spleen nuclear extract and LIA using recombinant Ro52 and Ro60 were analysed on HEp-2000 and DID with natural Ro60. Of these, 91 were anti-Ro60 positive on LIA and/ or DID with natural Ro60. The HEp-2000 substrate detected 70/91 (sensitivity 77%) and correlated strongest with DID. Most of the missed anti-Ro60-positive sera had high ANA intensity. The substrate did not detect monospecific anti-Ro52 antibodies (sensitivity 9.7%; 3/31). HEp-2000 substrate can therefore be considered a reliable, simple and alternative method for DID in the detection of anti-Ro60 reactivity. Special follow-up should be given to sera with strong ANA patterns in which the SSA/Ro60 staining pattern may be hidden. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0770-3198 1434-9949 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s100670070048 |