Loading…

Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States

A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theriogenology 2004-04, Vol.61 (6), p.997-1007
Main Authors: Dargatz, David A, Dewell, Grant A, Mortimer, Robert G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793
container_end_page 1007
container_issue 6
container_start_page 997
container_title Theriogenology
container_volume 61
creator Dargatz, David A
Dewell, Grant A
Mortimer, Robert G
description A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24 h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8 h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5 h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093691X03001456</els_id><sourcerecordid>71750407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1uEzEURi1ERdPCIwBeIVgMXI9jz3iFUEQBqRKLEImd5bGvU6OMHWyniF3fgTfskzD5UVmy8pV1vns_HUKeM3jLgMl3SwDFG6nY99fA3wCwuWjkIzJjfaca3nL2mMwekHNyUcoPAOBSsifknIlpUgpmBBdmcxvimproqD3No4lmjSPGSpOnA6KnNv0qB-YGg8dcaIr7v_u7P1PI07TFbGpIsdAQab1BuoqhoqPLaiqWp-TMm03BZ6f3kqyuPn5bfG6uv376svhw3Vjei9pwZ6VgIIF52aLzYjCSq9apdqo-2LkU0HvmWQvdIFtnrVGCt0z1IIeBd4pfklfHvducfu6wVD2GYnGzMRHTruiOdQLm0E2gOII2p1Iyer3NYTT5t2ag9371wa_ey9PA9cGvllPuxenAbhjR_UudhE7AyyPgTdJmnUPRq2ULjE_rul7CvuP7I4GTiNuAWRcbMFp0IaOt2qXwnxJ_AZJzlDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71750407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Dargatz, David A ; Dewell, Grant A ; Mortimer, Robert G</creator><creatorcontrib>Dargatz, David A ; Dewell, Grant A ; Mortimer, Robert G</creatorcontrib><description>A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24 h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8 h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5 h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15036990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Beef ; Breeding ; Calving ; Calving management ; Cattle ; Cattle - physiology ; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary ; disease prevalence ; Dystocia ; Dystocia - epidemiology ; Dystocia - veterinary ; farm surveys ; Female ; Housing, Animal ; Labor, Obstetric ; Pregnancy ; Seasons ; Time Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>Theriogenology, 2004-04, Vol.61 (6), p.997-1007</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15036990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dargatz, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewell, Grant A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Robert G</creatorcontrib><title>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</title><title>Theriogenology</title><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><description>A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24 h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8 h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5 h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Calving</subject><subject>Calving management</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary</subject><subject>disease prevalence</subject><subject>Dystocia</subject><subject>Dystocia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dystocia - veterinary</subject><subject>farm surveys</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0093-691X</issn><issn>1879-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1uEzEURi1ERdPCIwBeIVgMXI9jz3iFUEQBqRKLEImd5bGvU6OMHWyniF3fgTfskzD5UVmy8pV1vns_HUKeM3jLgMl3SwDFG6nY99fA3wCwuWjkIzJjfaca3nL2mMwekHNyUcoPAOBSsifknIlpUgpmBBdmcxvimproqD3No4lmjSPGSpOnA6KnNv0qB-YGg8dcaIr7v_u7P1PI07TFbGpIsdAQab1BuoqhoqPLaiqWp-TMm03BZ6f3kqyuPn5bfG6uv376svhw3Vjei9pwZ6VgIIF52aLzYjCSq9apdqo-2LkU0HvmWQvdIFtnrVGCt0z1IIeBd4pfklfHvducfu6wVD2GYnGzMRHTruiOdQLm0E2gOII2p1Iyer3NYTT5t2ag9371wa_ey9PA9cGvllPuxenAbhjR_UudhE7AyyPgTdJmnUPRq2ULjE_rul7CvuP7I4GTiNuAWRcbMFp0IaOt2qXwnxJ_AZJzlDA</recordid><startdate>20040415</startdate><enddate>20040415</enddate><creator>Dargatz, David A</creator><creator>Dewell, Grant A</creator><creator>Mortimer, Robert G</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040415</creationdate><title>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</title><author>Dargatz, David A ; Dewell, Grant A ; Mortimer, Robert G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Calving</topic><topic>Calving management</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary</topic><topic>disease prevalence</topic><topic>Dystocia</topic><topic>Dystocia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dystocia - veterinary</topic><topic>farm surveys</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dargatz, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewell, Grant A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Robert G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dargatz, David A</au><au>Dewell, Grant A</au><au>Mortimer, Robert G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><date>2004-04-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>997</spage><epage>1007</epage><pages>997-1007</pages><issn>0093-691X</issn><eissn>1879-3231</eissn><abstract>A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24 h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8 h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5 h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15036990</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-691X
ispartof Theriogenology, 2004-04, Vol.61 (6), p.997-1007
issn 0093-691X
1879-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750407
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Animals
Beef
Breeding
Calving
Calving management
Cattle
Cattle - physiology
Cattle Diseases - epidemiology
Delivery, Obstetric - methods
Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary
disease prevalence
Dystocia
Dystocia - epidemiology
Dystocia - veterinary
farm surveys
Female
Housing, Animal
Labor, Obstetric
Pregnancy
Seasons
Time Factors
United States
title Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calving%20and%20calving%20management%20of%20beef%20cows%20and%20heifers%20on%20cow%E2%80%93calf%20operations%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Theriogenology&rft.au=Dargatz,%20David%20A&rft.date=2004-04-15&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=997&rft.epage=1007&rft.pages=997-1007&rft.issn=0093-691X&rft.eissn=1879-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71750407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71750407&rft_id=info:pmid/15036990&rfr_iscdi=true