Loading…
Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States
A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving...
Saved in:
Published in: | Theriogenology 2004-04, Vol.61 (6), p.997-1007 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793 |
container_end_page | 1007 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 997 |
container_title | Theriogenology |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Dargatz, David A Dewell, Grant A Mortimer, Robert G |
description | A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24
h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8
h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5
h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093691X03001456</els_id><sourcerecordid>71750407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1uEzEURi1ERdPCIwBeIVgMXI9jz3iFUEQBqRKLEImd5bGvU6OMHWyniF3fgTfskzD5UVmy8pV1vns_HUKeM3jLgMl3SwDFG6nY99fA3wCwuWjkIzJjfaca3nL2mMwekHNyUcoPAOBSsifknIlpUgpmBBdmcxvimproqD3No4lmjSPGSpOnA6KnNv0qB-YGg8dcaIr7v_u7P1PI07TFbGpIsdAQab1BuoqhoqPLaiqWp-TMm03BZ6f3kqyuPn5bfG6uv376svhw3Vjei9pwZ6VgIIF52aLzYjCSq9apdqo-2LkU0HvmWQvdIFtnrVGCt0z1IIeBd4pfklfHvducfu6wVD2GYnGzMRHTruiOdQLm0E2gOII2p1Iyer3NYTT5t2ag9371wa_ey9PA9cGvllPuxenAbhjR_UudhE7AyyPgTdJmnUPRq2ULjE_rul7CvuP7I4GTiNuAWRcbMFp0IaOt2qXwnxJ_AZJzlDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71750407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Dargatz, David A ; Dewell, Grant A ; Mortimer, Robert G</creator><creatorcontrib>Dargatz, David A ; Dewell, Grant A ; Mortimer, Robert G</creatorcontrib><description>A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24
h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8
h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5
h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15036990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Beef ; Breeding ; Calving ; Calving management ; Cattle ; Cattle - physiology ; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary ; disease prevalence ; Dystocia ; Dystocia - epidemiology ; Dystocia - veterinary ; farm surveys ; Female ; Housing, Animal ; Labor, Obstetric ; Pregnancy ; Seasons ; Time Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>Theriogenology, 2004-04, Vol.61 (6), p.997-1007</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15036990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dargatz, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewell, Grant A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Robert G</creatorcontrib><title>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</title><title>Theriogenology</title><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><description>A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24
h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8
h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5
h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Calving</subject><subject>Calving management</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary</subject><subject>disease prevalence</subject><subject>Dystocia</subject><subject>Dystocia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dystocia - veterinary</subject><subject>farm surveys</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0093-691X</issn><issn>1879-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1uEzEURi1ERdPCIwBeIVgMXI9jz3iFUEQBqRKLEImd5bGvU6OMHWyniF3fgTfskzD5UVmy8pV1vns_HUKeM3jLgMl3SwDFG6nY99fA3wCwuWjkIzJjfaca3nL2mMwekHNyUcoPAOBSsifknIlpUgpmBBdmcxvimproqD3No4lmjSPGSpOnA6KnNv0qB-YGg8dcaIr7v_u7P1PI07TFbGpIsdAQab1BuoqhoqPLaiqWp-TMm03BZ6f3kqyuPn5bfG6uv376svhw3Vjei9pwZ6VgIIF52aLzYjCSq9apdqo-2LkU0HvmWQvdIFtnrVGCt0z1IIeBd4pfklfHvducfu6wVD2GYnGzMRHTruiOdQLm0E2gOII2p1Iyer3NYTT5t2ag9371wa_ey9PA9cGvllPuxenAbhjR_UudhE7AyyPgTdJmnUPRq2ULjE_rul7CvuP7I4GTiNuAWRcbMFp0IaOt2qXwnxJ_AZJzlDA</recordid><startdate>20040415</startdate><enddate>20040415</enddate><creator>Dargatz, David A</creator><creator>Dewell, Grant A</creator><creator>Mortimer, Robert G</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040415</creationdate><title>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</title><author>Dargatz, David A ; Dewell, Grant A ; Mortimer, Robert G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Calving</topic><topic>Calving management</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary</topic><topic>disease prevalence</topic><topic>Dystocia</topic><topic>Dystocia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dystocia - veterinary</topic><topic>farm surveys</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dargatz, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewell, Grant A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Robert G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dargatz, David A</au><au>Dewell, Grant A</au><au>Mortimer, Robert G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><date>2004-04-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>997</spage><epage>1007</epage><pages>997-1007</pages><issn>0093-691X</issn><eissn>1879-3231</eissn><abstract>A national sample of cow–calf producers was contacted to participate in a study to describe selected calving management practices on operations throughout the United States. Information was gathered on calving season, frequency of dystocia, frequency of observation, timing of assistance, and calving facilities. Regional and herd size differences existed in all parameters evaluated. Most calves (63.9%) were born in the months of February, March, and April. Overall, 16.7% of heifers and 2.7% of cows required some level of assistance in calving. Heifers and cows were checked an average of only 3.6 and 2.5 times per 24
h period during the calving season. Producers allowed heifers to labor for an average of 2.8
h prior to lending assistance in calving while cows were allowed an average of 3.5
h before providing assistance. In addition, only 39.6% of calvings took place in specialized calving areas presumably to allow increased observation frequency, timely intervention and protection from the elements. Collectively, these management practices illustrate that opportunities exist to improve calf survivability and increase reproductive efficiency in many cow herds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15036990</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-691X |
ispartof | Theriogenology, 2004-04, Vol.61 (6), p.997-1007 |
issn | 0093-691X 1879-3231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750407 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Animals Beef Breeding Calving Calving management Cattle Cattle - physiology Cattle Diseases - epidemiology Delivery, Obstetric - methods Delivery, Obstetric - veterinary disease prevalence Dystocia Dystocia - epidemiology Dystocia - veterinary farm surveys Female Housing, Animal Labor, Obstetric Pregnancy Seasons Time Factors United States |
title | Calving and calving management of beef cows and heifers on cow–calf operations in the United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calving%20and%20calving%20management%20of%20beef%20cows%20and%20heifers%20on%20cow%E2%80%93calf%20operations%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Theriogenology&rft.au=Dargatz,%20David%20A&rft.date=2004-04-15&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=997&rft.epage=1007&rft.pages=997-1007&rft.issn=0093-691X&rft.eissn=1879-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00145-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71750407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3dc6510601f62edf5ba6392d92000bc46508f1f1207b62dcca953219806bb3793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71750407&rft_id=info:pmid/15036990&rfr_iscdi=true |