Loading…
Dimensional Changes Cannot Account For All Differences in Short-Term Cycling Power During Growth
The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent anthropometric characteristics account for cycling peak power during growth. Five hundred and six male subjects aged 7.5-18 years performed three brief maximal sprints on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer. Cycling peak power (CPP) was calcula...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of sports medicine 2000-07, Vol.21 (5), p.360-365 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent anthropometric characteristics account for cycling peak power during growth. Five hundred and six male subjects aged 7.5-18 years performed three brief maximal sprints on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer. Cycling peak power (CPP) was calculated including the flywheel inertia of the device. Fat-free mass (FFM) and lean leg volume (LLV) were assessed by anthropometry. Anthropometric characteristics increased significantly during growth (p 0.3). The same pattern was observed for CPP, while the time to reach CPP decreased during growth. CPP correlated as highly with LLV as with FFM and both parameters may therefore be interchanged. However, in non weight-bearing exercises, such as cycling, it seems more relevant to "normalise" leg power for LLV. Multiple stepwise regression, using an allometric model, showed that a large part of the variance of CPP was explained by LLV (88.2%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0172-4622 1439-3964 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-2000-3783 |