Loading…
Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues
We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vision research (Oxford) 2002-05, Vol.42 (11), p.1403-1412 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143 |
container_end_page | 1412 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1403 |
container_title | Vision research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie Wexler, Mark Droulez, Jacques Marin, Emmanuel Miège, Christian Bourdoncle, Bernard |
description | We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71788457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004269890100298X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71788457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFq3DAURUVJ6Ewm_YQWbRKShZMnW5LlbEIZ2iQw0EWTMjshSzJVsS1Xsgfy95VnhmaZleBy7ntPB6HPBG4IEH77E4DmGa9EdQXkGiCvRLb9gJZElCJjnPITtPyPLNBZjH8AoGR59REtSA6UlpQv0faXi5Nq8WCDtsPofI99g4dW9SpgH5ztRzWnd9j4zvWq13YG4pxqbFLlN9aTjdjvbMCd30-Yg3N02qg22k_Hd4Vevn97Xj9mmx8PT-uvm0xTVo6Z0bURhTGGNZZBobkAw2slWMMLynNCNBNQ5zkwSjivFOQ1Lwhjja4AakKLFbo8zB2C_5v2jrJzUds2_cD6KcqSlEKkVQlkB1AHH2OwjRyC61R4lQTkrFTulcrZlwQi90rlNvW-HBdMdWfNW-voMAEXR0BFrdomJEkuvnFFSSpB50vvD5xNOnbOBhl18qutccHqURrv3jnlHx28k0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71788457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie ; Wexler, Mark ; Droulez, Jacques ; Marin, Emmanuel ; Miège, Christian ; Bourdoncle, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie ; Wexler, Mark ; Droulez, Jacques ; Marin, Emmanuel ; Miège, Christian ; Bourdoncle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12044746</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VISRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Depth Perception ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Motion parallax ; Motion Perception ; Optic flow ; Orientation ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Rotation ; Texture ; Vision ; Vision, Monocular</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2002-05, Vol.42 (11), p.1403-1412</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13719844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12044746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droulez, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miège, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdoncle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Depth Perception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion parallax</subject><subject>Motion Perception</subject><subject>Optic flow</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Vision, Monocular</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFq3DAURUVJ6Ewm_YQWbRKShZMnW5LlbEIZ2iQw0EWTMjshSzJVsS1Xsgfy95VnhmaZleBy7ntPB6HPBG4IEH77E4DmGa9EdQXkGiCvRLb9gJZElCJjnPITtPyPLNBZjH8AoGR59REtSA6UlpQv0faXi5Nq8WCDtsPofI99g4dW9SpgH5ztRzWnd9j4zvWq13YG4pxqbFLlN9aTjdjvbMCd30-Yg3N02qg22k_Hd4Vevn97Xj9mmx8PT-uvm0xTVo6Z0bURhTGGNZZBobkAw2slWMMLynNCNBNQ5zkwSjivFOQ1Lwhjja4AakKLFbo8zB2C_5v2jrJzUds2_cD6KcqSlEKkVQlkB1AHH2OwjRyC61R4lQTkrFTulcrZlwQi90rlNvW-HBdMdWfNW-voMAEXR0BFrdomJEkuvnFFSSpB50vvD5xNOnbOBhl18qutccHqURrv3jnlHx28k0w</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</creator><creator>Wexler, Mark</creator><creator>Droulez, Jacques</creator><creator>Marin, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Miège, Christian</creator><creator>Bourdoncle, Bernard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</title><author>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie ; Wexler, Mark ; Droulez, Jacques ; Marin, Emmanuel ; Miège, Christian ; Bourdoncle, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Depth Perception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion parallax</topic><topic>Motion Perception</topic><topic>Optic flow</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Vision, Monocular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droulez, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miège, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdoncle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</au><au>Wexler, Mark</au><au>Droulez, Jacques</au><au>Marin, Emmanuel</au><au>Miège, Christian</au><au>Bourdoncle, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1403</spage><epage>1412</epage><pages>1403-1412</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><coden>VISRAM</coden><abstract>We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12044746</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-6989 |
ispartof | Vision research (Oxford), 2002-05, Vol.42 (11), p.1403-1412 |
issn | 0042-6989 1878-5646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71788457 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cues Depth Perception Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Motion parallax Motion Perception Optic flow Orientation Pattern Recognition, Visual Perception Photic Stimulation - methods Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Rotation Texture Vision Vision, Monocular |
title | Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20perception%20of%20planar%20orientation:%20dominance%20of%20static%20depth%20cues%20over%20motion%20cues&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Cornilleau-P%C3%A9r%C3%A8s,%20Val%C3%A9rie&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1403&rft.epage=1412&rft.pages=1403-1412&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft.coden=VISRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71788457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71788457&rft_id=info:pmid/12044746&rfr_iscdi=true |