Loading…

Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues

We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vision research (Oxford) 2002-05, Vol.42 (11), p.1403-1412
Main Authors: Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie, Wexler, Mark, Droulez, Jacques, Marin, Emmanuel, Miège, Christian, Bourdoncle, Bernard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143
container_end_page 1412
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1403
container_title Vision research (Oxford)
container_volume 42
creator Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie
Wexler, Mark
Droulez, Jacques
Marin, Emmanuel
Miège, Christian
Bourdoncle, Bernard
description We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71788457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004269890100298X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71788457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFq3DAURUVJ6Ewm_YQWbRKShZMnW5LlbEIZ2iQw0EWTMjshSzJVsS1Xsgfy95VnhmaZleBy7ntPB6HPBG4IEH77E4DmGa9EdQXkGiCvRLb9gJZElCJjnPITtPyPLNBZjH8AoGR59REtSA6UlpQv0faXi5Nq8WCDtsPofI99g4dW9SpgH5ztRzWnd9j4zvWq13YG4pxqbFLlN9aTjdjvbMCd30-Yg3N02qg22k_Hd4Vevn97Xj9mmx8PT-uvm0xTVo6Z0bURhTGGNZZBobkAw2slWMMLynNCNBNQ5zkwSjivFOQ1Lwhjja4AakKLFbo8zB2C_5v2jrJzUds2_cD6KcqSlEKkVQlkB1AHH2OwjRyC61R4lQTkrFTulcrZlwQi90rlNvW-HBdMdWfNW-voMAEXR0BFrdomJEkuvnFFSSpB50vvD5xNOnbOBhl18qutccHqURrv3jnlHx28k0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71788457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie ; Wexler, Mark ; Droulez, Jacques ; Marin, Emmanuel ; Miège, Christian ; Bourdoncle, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie ; Wexler, Mark ; Droulez, Jacques ; Marin, Emmanuel ; Miège, Christian ; Bourdoncle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12044746</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VISRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Depth Perception ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Motion parallax ; Motion Perception ; Optic flow ; Orientation ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Rotation ; Texture ; Vision ; Vision, Monocular</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2002-05, Vol.42 (11), p.1403-1412</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13719844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12044746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droulez, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miège, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdoncle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Depth Perception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion parallax</subject><subject>Motion Perception</subject><subject>Optic flow</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Vision, Monocular</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFq3DAURUVJ6Ewm_YQWbRKShZMnW5LlbEIZ2iQw0EWTMjshSzJVsS1Xsgfy95VnhmaZleBy7ntPB6HPBG4IEH77E4DmGa9EdQXkGiCvRLb9gJZElCJjnPITtPyPLNBZjH8AoGR59REtSA6UlpQv0faXi5Nq8WCDtsPofI99g4dW9SpgH5ztRzWnd9j4zvWq13YG4pxqbFLlN9aTjdjvbMCd30-Yg3N02qg22k_Hd4Vevn97Xj9mmx8PT-uvm0xTVo6Z0bURhTGGNZZBobkAw2slWMMLynNCNBNQ5zkwSjivFOQ1Lwhjja4AakKLFbo8zB2C_5v2jrJzUds2_cD6KcqSlEKkVQlkB1AHH2OwjRyC61R4lQTkrFTulcrZlwQi90rlNvW-HBdMdWfNW-voMAEXR0BFrdomJEkuvnFFSSpB50vvD5xNOnbOBhl18qutccHqURrv3jnlHx28k0w</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</creator><creator>Wexler, Mark</creator><creator>Droulez, Jacques</creator><creator>Marin, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Miège, Christian</creator><creator>Bourdoncle, Bernard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</title><author>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie ; Wexler, Mark ; Droulez, Jacques ; Marin, Emmanuel ; Miège, Christian ; Bourdoncle, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Depth Perception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion parallax</topic><topic>Motion Perception</topic><topic>Optic flow</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Vision, Monocular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexler, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droulez, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miège, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdoncle, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cornilleau-Pérès, Valérie</au><au>Wexler, Mark</au><au>Droulez, Jacques</au><au>Marin, Emmanuel</au><au>Miège, Christian</au><au>Bourdoncle, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1403</spage><epage>1412</epage><pages>1403-1412</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><coden>VISRAM</coden><abstract>We measured the ability to report the tilt (direction of maximal slope) of a plane under monocular viewing conditions, from static depth cues (square grid patterns) and motion parallax (small rotations of the plane about a frontoparallel axis). These two cues were presented separately, or simultaneously. In the latter case they specified tilts that were either collinear (coherent case) or orthogonal (conflict case). The field of view was small (8°) or large (60°). In small field, for motion parallax, the reported tilt depends strongly on the orientation of the plane relative to the rotation axis, being totally ambiguous when tilt is collinear with the rotation axis. In contrast, in large field, the reported tilt depends little on this variable, and is accurately specified by motion cues. In both cases static cues strongly dominated the tilt reports. Hence static grid patterns constitute robust tilt cues, which can dominate contradictory tilt indications from motion parallax, and should be considered as essential for the visual orientation during locomotion, or the immersion in virtual reality environments.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12044746</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-6989
ispartof Vision research (Oxford), 2002-05, Vol.42 (11), p.1403-1412
issn 0042-6989
1878-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71788457
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cues
Depth Perception
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Motion parallax
Motion Perception
Optic flow
Orientation
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perception
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Rotation
Texture
Vision
Vision, Monocular
title Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20perception%20of%20planar%20orientation:%20dominance%20of%20static%20depth%20cues%20over%20motion%20cues&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Cornilleau-P%C3%A9r%C3%A8s,%20Val%C3%A9rie&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1403&rft.epage=1412&rft.pages=1403-1412&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft.coden=VISRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00298-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71788457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dcbd83ddd5fe503c680d6ba85f6346211c580b220541669a02b63155fc900b143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71788457&rft_id=info:pmid/12044746&rfr_iscdi=true