Revised Estimates of Dimension and Exercise Variance Components in Assessment Center Postexercise Dimension Ratings

The authors reanalyzed assessment center (AC) multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices containing correlations among postexercise dimension ratings (PEDRs) reported by F. Lievens and J. M. Conway (2001) . Unlike F. Lievens and J. M. Conway, who used a correlated dimension-correlated uniqueness model,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2004-04, Vol.89 (2), p.377-385
Main Authors: Lance, Charles E, Lambert, Tracy A, Gewin, Amanda G, Lievens, Filip, Conway, James M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis of Variance
Assessment Centers
Assessment centres
Biological and medical sciences
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Construct Validity
Evaluation
Factor Analysis
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Mathematical models
Methodology
Models, Theoretical
Multidimensional Scaling
Occupational psychology
Orientation. Selection. Evaluation
Personnel Selection
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Rating Scales
Reproducibility of Results
Research methods
Studies
Variance analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors reanalyzed assessment center (AC) multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices containing correlations among postexercise dimension ratings (PEDRs) reported by F. Lievens and J. M. Conway (2001) . Unlike F. Lievens and J. M. Conway, who used a correlated dimension-correlated uniqueness model, we used a different set of confirmatory-factor-analysis-based models (1-dimension-correlated Exercise and 1-dimension-correlated uniqueness models) to estimate dimension and exercise variance components in AC PEDRs. Results of reanalyses suggest that, consistent with previous narrative reviews, exercise variance components dominate over dimension variance components after all. Implications for AC construct validity and possible redirections of research on the validity of ACs are discussed.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.377