Modeling the water use efficiency of soybean and maize plants under environmental stresses: application of a synthetic model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on stomatal behavior

• Published in: Journal of plant physiology 2004-03, Vol.161 (3), p.303-318
• Main Authors: Yu, Gui-Rui, Wang, Qiu-Feng, Zhuang, J.i.e.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Biological and medical sciences; corn; Economic plant physiology; Ecosystem; environmental stresses; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Glycine max; Glycine max - metabolism; grain crops; Kinetics; leaf water potential; maize ( Zea mays L.); mathematical models; mesophyll; Models, Biological; Photosynthesis; plant response; plant stress; Soil - analysis; soil water content; soybean ( Glycine max Merr.); soybeans; Species Specificity; stomatal conductance; transpiration; Water - metabolism; Water relations, transpiration, stomata; water stress; water use efficiency; water use efficiency (WUE); Zea mays; Zea mays - metabolism
• ISSN: 0176-1617; 1618-1328
• DOI: 10.1078/0176-1617-00972

Understanding the variability of plant WUE and its control mechanism can promote the comprehension to the coupling relationship of water and carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystem, which is the foundation for developing water-carbon coupling cycle model. In this paper, we made clear the differences of net assimilation rate, transpiration rate, and WUE between the two species by comparing the experiment data of soybean ( Glycine max Merr.) and maize ( Zea mays L.) plants under water and soil nutrient stresses. WUE of maize was about two and a half times more than that of soybean in the same weather conditions. Enhancement of water stresses led to the marked decrease of A m and E m of two species, but water stresses of some degree could improve WUE, and this effect was more obvious for soybean. WUE of the two species changed with Ψ L in a second-order curve relation, and the WUE at high fertilization was higher than that at low fertilization, this effect was especially obvious for maize. Moreover, according to the synthetic model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on stomatal behavior (SMPTSB) presented by Yu et al. (2001), the WUE model and its applicability were discussed with the data measured in this experiment. The WUE estimated by means of the model accorded well with the measured values. However, this model underestimated the WUE for maize slightly, thus further improvement on the original model was made in this study. Finally, by discussing some physiological factors controlling A m and WUE, we made clear the physiological explanation for differences of the relative contributions of stomata- and mesophyll processes to control of A m and WUE, and the applicability of WUE model between the two species. Because the requirement to stomatal conductance by unit change of net assimilation rate is different, the responses of opening-closing activity of stomata to environmental stresses are different between the two species. To obtain the same level of net assimilation rate, soybean has to open its stomata more widely to keep small stomatal resistance, as compared with maize.