Loading…
Left retroperitoneal approach using a retractor to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with the transperitoneal approach
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the retroperitoneal approach (RP) using a Thompson retractor with the conventional transperitoneal approach (TP), to repair infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). A total of 91 consecutive patients were divided into two groups; grou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2002-01, Vol.32 (7), p.577-580 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the retroperitoneal approach (RP) using a Thompson retractor with the conventional transperitoneal approach (TP), to repair infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).
A total of 91 consecutive patients were divided into two groups; group A ( n = 21) underwent surgery using the TP, and group B ( n = 70) underwent surgery using the RP with a Thompson retractor.
There were no significant differences in the operation time, aortic cross-clamp time, incidence of postoperative cardiac events, or the development of wound complications; however, a significantly higher rate of postoperative respiratory complications and ileus was observed in group A. Moreover, oral feeding was commenced later and the hospital stay was prolonged in group A ( P < 0.01).
These findings clearly demonstrate that our RP method, especially when using a Thompson retractor, is a preferable alternative to TP for AAA surgery. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0941-1291 1436-2813 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s005950200104 |