Loading…

Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India

Background There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods A house‐to‐house survey of r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2002-06, Vol.17 (6), p.659-665
Main Authors: SINGH, VIRENDRA, TRIKHA, BANDANA, NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL, SINGH, KARTAR, VAIPHEI, KIM
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3
container_end_page 665
container_issue 6
container_start_page 659
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 17
creator SINGH, VIRENDRA
TRIKHA, BANDANA
NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL
SINGH, KARTAR
VAIPHEI, KIM
description Background There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery. Results Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P > 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer. Conclusions This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71883028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71883028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9P2zAYh61pExTGV5hyYbeU139iOwcOrGItiHWXTXCzHOfN5M5NMrvV2m9PQiu4cvIr-_n5_ekhJKMwpSDk1WpKhYCcKiGnDIBNgY3j7gOZvD58JBPQtMhLTstTcpbSCgAEqOKEnFJGASSFCbm-7X2Na9-F7s8-65psgcG7rrJugzHr96GLPrNtnfXYb7zLtsEN977N7tra28_kU2NDwovjeU5-f7_9NVvkDz_nd7Obh9wJzmXeFFBarAqnK421RMaZEFIVVVMrCs5qJgvUJeiqpNRap1A5XtdYVUNHzS0_J18P__ax-7fFtDFrnxyGYFvstskoqjUHpgdQH0AXu5QiNqaPfm3j3lAwozqzMqMhMxoyozrzos7shuiX445ttcb6LXh0NQCXR8AmZ0MTbet8euO4FiVTY4frA_ffB9y_u4C5ny_Gacjnh7xPG9y95m38a6TiqjCPy7lhcvlDz56W5ht_BuL2mAE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71883028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>SINGH, VIRENDRA ; TRIKHA, BANDANA ; NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL ; SINGH, KARTAR ; VAIPHEI, KIM</creator><creatorcontrib>SINGH, VIRENDRA ; TRIKHA, BANDANA ; NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL ; SINGH, KARTAR ; VAIPHEI, KIM</creatorcontrib><description>Background There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery. Results Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P &gt; 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer. Conclusions This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12100610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; asymptomatic community ; Biological and medical sciences ; endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Health Surveys ; Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis ; Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; peptic ulcer ; Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis ; Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology ; Peptic Ulcer - microbiology ; Prevalence ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tropical medicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2002-06, Vol.17 (6), p.659-665</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13849278$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12100610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SINGH, VIRENDRA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRIKHA, BANDANA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGH, KARTAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAIPHEI, KIM</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery. Results Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P &gt; 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer. Conclusions This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>asymptomatic community</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Helicobacter pylori</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>peptic ulcer</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9P2zAYh61pExTGV5hyYbeU139iOwcOrGItiHWXTXCzHOfN5M5NMrvV2m9PQiu4cvIr-_n5_ekhJKMwpSDk1WpKhYCcKiGnDIBNgY3j7gOZvD58JBPQtMhLTstTcpbSCgAEqOKEnFJGASSFCbm-7X2Na9-F7s8-65psgcG7rrJugzHr96GLPrNtnfXYb7zLtsEN977N7tra28_kU2NDwovjeU5-f7_9NVvkDz_nd7Obh9wJzmXeFFBarAqnK421RMaZEFIVVVMrCs5qJgvUJeiqpNRap1A5XtdYVUNHzS0_J18P__ax-7fFtDFrnxyGYFvstskoqjUHpgdQH0AXu5QiNqaPfm3j3lAwozqzMqMhMxoyozrzos7shuiX445ttcb6LXh0NQCXR8AmZ0MTbet8euO4FiVTY4frA_ffB9y_u4C5ny_Gacjnh7xPG9y95m38a6TiqjCPy7lhcvlDz56W5ht_BuL2mAE</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>SINGH, VIRENDRA</creator><creator>TRIKHA, BANDANA</creator><creator>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</creator><creator>SINGH, KARTAR</creator><creator>VAIPHEI, KIM</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</title><author>SINGH, VIRENDRA ; TRIKHA, BANDANA ; NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL ; SINGH, KARTAR ; VAIPHEI, KIM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>asymptomatic community</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Helicobacter pylori</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>peptic ulcer</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SINGH, VIRENDRA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRIKHA, BANDANA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGH, KARTAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAIPHEI, KIM</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SINGH, VIRENDRA</au><au>TRIKHA, BANDANA</au><au>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</au><au>SINGH, KARTAR</au><au>VAIPHEI, KIM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>659</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>659-665</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery. Results Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P &gt; 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer. Conclusions This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><pmid>12100610</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2002-06, Vol.17 (6), p.659-665
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71883028
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
asymptomatic community
Biological and medical sciences
endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
epidemiology
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Health Surveys
Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis
Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology
Helicobacter pylori
Humans
India - epidemiology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
peptic ulcer
Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis
Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology
Peptic Ulcer - microbiology
Prevalence
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tropical medicine
title Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A10%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20Helicobacter%20pylori%20and%20peptic%20ulcer%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=SINGH,%20VIRENDRA&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=659&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=659-665&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71883028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71883028&rft_id=info:pmid/12100610&rfr_iscdi=true