Loading…
Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India
Background There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods A house‐to‐house survey of r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2002-06, Vol.17 (6), p.659-665 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3 |
container_end_page | 665 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 659 |
container_title | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | SINGH, VIRENDRA TRIKHA, BANDANA NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL SINGH, KARTAR VAIPHEI, KIM |
description | Background
There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection.
Methods
A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery.
Results
Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P > 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71883028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71883028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9P2zAYh61pExTGV5hyYbeU139iOwcOrGItiHWXTXCzHOfN5M5NMrvV2m9PQiu4cvIr-_n5_ekhJKMwpSDk1WpKhYCcKiGnDIBNgY3j7gOZvD58JBPQtMhLTstTcpbSCgAEqOKEnFJGASSFCbm-7X2Na9-F7s8-65psgcG7rrJugzHr96GLPrNtnfXYb7zLtsEN977N7tra28_kU2NDwovjeU5-f7_9NVvkDz_nd7Obh9wJzmXeFFBarAqnK421RMaZEFIVVVMrCs5qJgvUJeiqpNRap1A5XtdYVUNHzS0_J18P__ax-7fFtDFrnxyGYFvstskoqjUHpgdQH0AXu5QiNqaPfm3j3lAwozqzMqMhMxoyozrzos7shuiX445ttcb6LXh0NQCXR8AmZ0MTbet8euO4FiVTY4frA_ffB9y_u4C5ny_Gacjnh7xPG9y95m38a6TiqjCPy7lhcvlDz56W5ht_BuL2mAE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71883028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>SINGH, VIRENDRA ; TRIKHA, BANDANA ; NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL ; SINGH, KARTAR ; VAIPHEI, KIM</creator><creatorcontrib>SINGH, VIRENDRA ; TRIKHA, BANDANA ; NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL ; SINGH, KARTAR ; VAIPHEI, KIM</creatorcontrib><description>Background
There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection.
Methods
A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery.
Results
Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P > 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12100610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; asymptomatic community ; Biological and medical sciences ; endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Health Surveys ; Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis ; Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; peptic ulcer ; Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis ; Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology ; Peptic Ulcer - microbiology ; Prevalence ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tropical medicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2002-06, Vol.17 (6), p.659-665</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13849278$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12100610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SINGH, VIRENDRA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRIKHA, BANDANA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGH, KARTAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAIPHEI, KIM</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background
There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection.
Methods
A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery.
Results
Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P > 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>asymptomatic community</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Helicobacter pylori</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>peptic ulcer</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9P2zAYh61pExTGV5hyYbeU139iOwcOrGItiHWXTXCzHOfN5M5NMrvV2m9PQiu4cvIr-_n5_ekhJKMwpSDk1WpKhYCcKiGnDIBNgY3j7gOZvD58JBPQtMhLTstTcpbSCgAEqOKEnFJGASSFCbm-7X2Na9-F7s8-65psgcG7rrJugzHr96GLPrNtnfXYb7zLtsEN977N7tra28_kU2NDwovjeU5-f7_9NVvkDz_nd7Obh9wJzmXeFFBarAqnK421RMaZEFIVVVMrCs5qJgvUJeiqpNRap1A5XtdYVUNHzS0_J18P__ax-7fFtDFrnxyGYFvstskoqjUHpgdQH0AXu5QiNqaPfm3j3lAwozqzMqMhMxoyozrzos7shuiX445ttcb6LXh0NQCXR8AmZ0MTbet8euO4FiVTY4frA_ffB9y_u4C5ny_Gacjnh7xPG9y95m38a6TiqjCPy7lhcvlDz56W5ht_BuL2mAE</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>SINGH, VIRENDRA</creator><creator>TRIKHA, BANDANA</creator><creator>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</creator><creator>SINGH, KARTAR</creator><creator>VAIPHEI, KIM</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</title><author>SINGH, VIRENDRA ; TRIKHA, BANDANA ; NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL ; SINGH, KARTAR ; VAIPHEI, KIM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>asymptomatic community</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Helicobacter pylori</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>peptic ulcer</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SINGH, VIRENDRA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRIKHA, BANDANA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGH, KARTAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAIPHEI, KIM</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SINGH, VIRENDRA</au><au>TRIKHA, BANDANA</au><au>NAIN, CHANDER KANWAL</au><au>SINGH, KARTAR</au><au>VAIPHEI, KIM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>659</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>659-665</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background
There is a wide variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer in India both before and since the use of endoscopy. We studied the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in northern India and its relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection.
Methods
A house‐to‐house survey of residents aged 15 years or above in a sub‐sector of Chandigarh was performed as part of a pilot survey. Subsequently, the study randomly covered all sectors of Chandigarh and we screened 2649 persons. A questionnaire was administered to each subject by trained staff. All individuals with history of peptic ulcer/dyspepsia and an equal number of asymptomatic individuals were asked to attend the outpatient department of the Institute. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer was based on endoscopy or history of previous ulcer surgery.
Results
Two hundred and fifty‐four individuals attended the outpatient department at the Institute and 147 underwent endoscopy, biopsy for histology and rapid urease test, and blood was collected for H. pylori serology. There were 80 symptomatic and 67 asymptomatic individuals. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 38 (56.7%) asymptomatic and 49 (61.3%) symptomatic individuals (P > 0.05). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 3.4% and the lifetime prevalence was 8.8%. The duodenal‐to‐gastric ulcer ratio was 12:1. Helicobacter pylori was present in 11/13 (84.6%) subjects with peptic ulcer. Peptic ulcer was more common in elderly and dyspeptic individuals and there was no effect of sex or socioeconomic status. Helicobacter pylori was associated with age only and did not depend on sex, socioeconomic status or dyspepsia. Of the 38 asymptomatic persons having H. pylori infection, none had active peptic ulcer.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates frequent occurrence of peptic ulcer and H. pylori in this part of the country. Peptic ulcer was more prevalent in the elderly and dyspeptic subjects. Helicobacter pylori was not associated with dyspepsia, and was more prevalent in elderly subjects. There was a low prevalence of peptic ulcer in asymptomatic H. pylori‐infected persons in this community.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><pmid>12100610</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0815-9319 |
ispartof | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2002-06, Vol.17 (6), p.659-665 |
issn | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71883028 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged asymptomatic community Biological and medical sciences endoscopy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal epidemiology Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Health Surveys Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis Helicobacter Infections - epidemiology Helicobacter pylori Humans India - epidemiology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Other diseases. Semiology peptic ulcer Peptic Ulcer - diagnosis Peptic Ulcer - epidemiology Peptic Ulcer - microbiology Prevalence Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Tropical medicine |
title | Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in India |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A10%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20Helicobacter%20pylori%20and%20peptic%20ulcer%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=SINGH,%20VIRENDRA&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=659&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=659-665&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02746.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71883028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4336-f509aeb5c8b8ed6e23244675bfd710ca8265e8908b911aac7e7c3ddebb61083a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71883028&rft_id=info:pmid/12100610&rfr_iscdi=true |