Loading…
Is ‘timing’ important for cytokine polarization?
A comparison of the longitudinal cytokine responses of cattle to infection with intracellular Mycobacterium bovis and extracellular Onchocerca ochengi illustrates the development of reciprocal interferon-γ and interleukin-4 responses, which result ultimately in an infection-induced type-1 or type-2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Trends in immunology 2002-05, Vol.23 (5), p.246-249 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A comparison of the longitudinal cytokine responses of cattle to infection with intracellular
Mycobacterium bovis and extracellular
Onchocerca ochengi illustrates the development of reciprocal interferon-γ and interleukin-4 responses, which result ultimately in an infection-induced type-1 or type-2 polarization, respectively. These kinetic studies of natural host–pathogen relationships show that the cytokine responses to infection fluctuate over time, resulting in periods of polarization and nonpolarization before the establishment of a chronic infection. Here, we discuss our data from cattle in the light of the current understanding of cytokine polarization towards infection in mouse models and humans.
Kinetic studies of natural host-pathogen relationships in cattle show that the cytokine responses to infection fluctuate over time, resulting ultimately in type-1 or type-2 polarization. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1471-4906 1471-4981 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02200-7 |