How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard

Coronary angioplasty should be based on documented ischemia. However, in daily clinical practice the indication for angioplasty is often based on eyeball assessment of the severity of the stenosis. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of eyeball estimation of coronary stenosis when taking...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2002-04, Vol.18 (2), p.73-76
Main Authors: BRUEREN, B. R. G, TEN BERG, J. M, SUTTORP, M. J, BAL, E. T, ERNST, J. M. P. G, MAST, E. G, PLOKKER, H. W. M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular system
Coronary Circulation
Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis
Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques of hemodynamics
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiography
Risk Factors
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-c9c42f8bc850077af92088bdc6e0dc25d0038b69ce0103b6f737e814b78e32b83
cites
container_end_page 76
container_issue 2
container_start_page 73
container_title The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
container_volume 18
creator BRUEREN, B. R. G
TEN BERG, J. M
SUTTORP, M. J
BAL, E. T
ERNST, J. M. P. G
MAST, E. G
PLOKKER, H. W. M
description Coronary angioplasty should be based on documented ischemia. However, in daily clinical practice the indication for angioplasty is often based on eyeball assessment of the severity of the stenosis. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of eyeball estimation of coronary stenosis when taking functional flow reserve (FFR) as gold standard. Study lesions were where no mutual agreement on the severity of the stenosis was obtained. The procedure consisted of a repeat control angiogram, FFR measurement and in case of FFR
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1014638917413
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71892107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71892107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-c9c42f8bc850077af92088bdc6e0dc25d0038b69ce0103b6f737e814b78e32b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1v1DAQhq0KRD_g3BuykOgt1GMnsd1bVQFFqsSFniPHnuy6JPbW9rbsb-HP4sJWlTjNHJ73Hc1DyCmwT8C4OL-8AAZtL5QG2YI4IEegZNcoAfxV3bteN53U7SE5zvmOMZBC6zfkEDiwGoEj8vs6PtJVjI6ahBR_bTB5DBYdtSY5H-e48rlkagrdJHTeFh9WtKyRrnGJbhfM4i3N-FBzZUfjRG1MMZi0o7lgiBkzfVxjoMX8fEpOydSKCsx0muvphBnTA1KT_5au4uxq0ARXr78lryczZ3y3nyfk9svnH1fXzc33r9-uLm8aK4CVxmrb8kmNVnWMSWkmzZlSo7M9Mmd55xgTauy1RQZMjP0khUQF7SgVCj4qcULO_vVuUrzfYi7D4rPFeTYB4zYPEpSuwmQFP_wH3sVtqr_kgVfXQoB8anu_h7bjgm7YJL9UHcOz8wp83AMmWzNXI8H6_MIJyUELLf4AHGKTIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215633178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>BRUEREN, B. R. G ; TEN BERG, J. M ; SUTTORP, M. J ; BAL, E. T ; ERNST, J. M. P. G ; MAST, E. G ; PLOKKER, H. W. M</creator><creatorcontrib>BRUEREN, B. R. G ; TEN BERG, J. M ; SUTTORP, M. J ; BAL, E. T ; ERNST, J. M. P. G ; MAST, E. G ; PLOKKER, H. W. M</creatorcontrib><description>Coronary angioplasty should be based on documented ischemia. However, in daily clinical practice the indication for angioplasty is often based on eyeball assessment of the severity of the stenosis. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of eyeball estimation of coronary stenosis when taking functional flow reserve (FFR) as gold standard. Study lesions were where no mutual agreement on the severity of the stenosis was obtained. The procedure consisted of a repeat control angiogram, FFR measurement and in case of FFR&lt;75% percutaneous coronary intervention. The eyeball assessment of the stenosis was written down before further execution of the procedure. FFR was measured with a pressure monitoring guide. Maximal myocardial hyperemia was induced by intravenous adenosine infusion. Fifty-two patients were studied. Agreement between eyeball assessment and FFR existed in a total of 36 cases (69.2%). Over estimation of hemodynamic severity occurred in six cases (11.5%) and under estimation in 10 cases (19.2%). Consequently, the positive predictive value of eyeball assessment for pressure-derived FFR was 63% and the negative predictive value 76%. The assessment of the hemodynamic severity of intermediate coronary stenosis should not be based on eyeball assessment even by experienced interventional cardiologists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-5794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1014638917413</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12108911</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCIBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Coronary Circulation ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques of hemodynamics ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiography ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2002-04, Vol.18 (2), p.73-76</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-c9c42f8bc850077af92088bdc6e0dc25d0038b69ce0103b6f737e814b78e32b83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13721939$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12108911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRUEREN, B. R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEN BERG, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUTTORP, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAL, E. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERNST, J. M. P. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAST, E. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PLOKKER, H. W. M</creatorcontrib><title>How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard</title><title>The international journal of cardiovascular imaging</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>Coronary angioplasty should be based on documented ischemia. However, in daily clinical practice the indication for angioplasty is often based on eyeball assessment of the severity of the stenosis. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of eyeball estimation of coronary stenosis when taking functional flow reserve (FFR) as gold standard. Study lesions were where no mutual agreement on the severity of the stenosis was obtained. The procedure consisted of a repeat control angiogram, FFR measurement and in case of FFR&lt;75% percutaneous coronary intervention. The eyeball assessment of the stenosis was written down before further execution of the procedure. FFR was measured with a pressure monitoring guide. Maximal myocardial hyperemia was induced by intravenous adenosine infusion. Fifty-two patients were studied. Agreement between eyeball assessment and FFR existed in a total of 36 cases (69.2%). Over estimation of hemodynamic severity occurred in six cases (11.5%) and under estimation in 10 cases (19.2%). Consequently, the positive predictive value of eyeball assessment for pressure-derived FFR was 63% and the negative predictive value 76%. The assessment of the hemodynamic severity of intermediate coronary stenosis should not be based on eyeball assessment even by experienced interventional cardiologists.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques of hemodynamics</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1569-5794</issn><issn>1875-8312</issn><issn>1573-0743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1v1DAQhq0KRD_g3BuykOgt1GMnsd1bVQFFqsSFniPHnuy6JPbW9rbsb-HP4sJWlTjNHJ73Hc1DyCmwT8C4OL-8AAZtL5QG2YI4IEegZNcoAfxV3bteN53U7SE5zvmOMZBC6zfkEDiwGoEj8vs6PtJVjI6ahBR_bTB5DBYdtSY5H-e48rlkagrdJHTeFh9WtKyRrnGJbhfM4i3N-FBzZUfjRG1MMZi0o7lgiBkzfVxjoMX8fEpOydSKCsx0muvphBnTA1KT_5au4uxq0ARXr78lryczZ3y3nyfk9svnH1fXzc33r9-uLm8aK4CVxmrb8kmNVnWMSWkmzZlSo7M9Mmd55xgTauy1RQZMjP0khUQF7SgVCj4qcULO_vVuUrzfYi7D4rPFeTYB4zYPEpSuwmQFP_wH3sVtqr_kgVfXQoB8anu_h7bjgm7YJL9UHcOz8wp83AMmWzNXI8H6_MIJyUELLf4AHGKTIQ</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>BRUEREN, B. R. G</creator><creator>TEN BERG, J. M</creator><creator>SUTTORP, M. J</creator><creator>BAL, E. T</creator><creator>ERNST, J. M. P. G</creator><creator>MAST, E. G</creator><creator>PLOKKER, H. W. M</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard</title><author>BRUEREN, B. R. G ; TEN BERG, J. M ; SUTTORP, M. J ; BAL, E. T ; ERNST, J. M. P. G ; MAST, E. G ; PLOKKER, H. W. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-c9c42f8bc850077af92088bdc6e0dc25d0038b69ce0103b6f737e814b78e32b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques of hemodynamics</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRUEREN, B. R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEN BERG, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUTTORP, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAL, E. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERNST, J. M. P. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAST, E. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PLOKKER, H. W. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of cardiovascular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRUEREN, B. R. G</au><au>TEN BERG, J. M</au><au>SUTTORP, M. J</au><au>BAL, E. T</au><au>ERNST, J. M. P. G</au><au>MAST, E. G</au><au>PLOKKER, H. W. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of cardiovascular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>73-76</pages><issn>1569-5794</issn><eissn>1875-8312</eissn><eissn>1573-0743</eissn><coden>IJCIBI</coden><abstract>Coronary angioplasty should be based on documented ischemia. However, in daily clinical practice the indication for angioplasty is often based on eyeball assessment of the severity of the stenosis. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of eyeball estimation of coronary stenosis when taking functional flow reserve (FFR) as gold standard. Study lesions were where no mutual agreement on the severity of the stenosis was obtained. The procedure consisted of a repeat control angiogram, FFR measurement and in case of FFR&lt;75% percutaneous coronary intervention. The eyeball assessment of the stenosis was written down before further execution of the procedure. FFR was measured with a pressure monitoring guide. Maximal myocardial hyperemia was induced by intravenous adenosine infusion. Fifty-two patients were studied. Agreement between eyeball assessment and FFR existed in a total of 36 cases (69.2%). Over estimation of hemodynamic severity occurred in six cases (11.5%) and under estimation in 10 cases (19.2%). Consequently, the positive predictive value of eyeball assessment for pressure-derived FFR was 63% and the negative predictive value 76%. The assessment of the hemodynamic severity of intermediate coronary stenosis should not be based on eyeball assessment even by experienced interventional cardiologists.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><pmid>12108911</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1014638917413</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-5794
ispartof The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2002-04, Vol.18 (2), p.73-76
issn 1569-5794
1875-8312
1573-0743
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71892107
source Springer Nature
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular system
Coronary Circulation
Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis
Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques of hemodynamics
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiography
Risk Factors
title How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20good%20are%20experienced%20cardiologists%20at%20predicting%20the%20hemodynamic%20severity%20of%20coronary%20stenoses%20when%20taking%20fractional%20flow%20reserve%20as%20the%20gold%20standard&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20imaging&rft.au=BRUEREN,%20B.%20R.%20G&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=73-76&rft.issn=1569-5794&rft.eissn=1875-8312&rft.coden=IJCIBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1014638917413&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71892107%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-c9c42f8bc850077af92088bdc6e0dc25d0038b69ce0103b6f737e814b78e32b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215633178&rft_id=info:pmid/12108911&rfr_iscdi=true