Loading…

DNA isolation from soil samples for cloning in different hosts

Many protocols to extract DNA directly from soil samples have been developed in recent years. We employed two extraction methods which differed in the method of lysis and compared these methods with respect to yield, purity and degree of shearing. The main focus was on the specific isolation of DNA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2004-06, Vol.64 (5), p.665-670
Main Authors: Kauffmann, I.M, Schmitt, J, Schmid, R.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-c49d97f312b47071d5843ab1d034de12b54249fb60e84e40fe0cd41e2a3b904e3
cites
container_end_page 670
container_issue 5
container_start_page 665
container_title Applied microbiology and biotechnology
container_volume 64
creator Kauffmann, I.M
Schmitt, J
Schmid, R.D
description Many protocols to extract DNA directly from soil samples have been developed in recent years. We employed two extraction methods which differed in the method of lysis and compared these methods with respect to yield, purity and degree of shearing. The main focus was on the specific isolation of DNA from different microorganisms, especially DNA from actinomycetes, as these cells are very difficult to lyse, in contrast to non-actinomycetes. Thus, we used both methods to isolate DNA from Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter and Rhodococcus and from soil spiked with the respective microorganisms. Both methods rendered high DNA yields with a low degree of shearing, but differed in the type of cells that were lysed. By one protocol (utilizing enzymatic lysis) only DNA from the Gram-negative Pseudomonas strain could be obtained whereas, by the other protocol (utilizing mechanical lysis), all microorganisms that were used could be lysed and DNA extracted from them. Using a combination of both protocols, DNA from those organisms could be obtained selectively. Furthermore, one of the protocols was modified, resulting in higher DNA yield and purity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00253-003-1528-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71921057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18060956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-c49d97f312b47071d5843ab1d034de12b54249fb60e84e40fe0cd41e2a3b904e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1rFTEUBuBQKvZa_QHd2CDobvScfGcjlPoJpV1o1yEzk9SUmcltMnfhvzflXih04ypweM4LOS8hZwgfEUB_qgBM8g6AdyiZ6cwR2aDgrAOF4phsALXstLTmhLyq9R4AmVHqJTlBoaWRKDfk85frC5pqnvya8kJjyTOtOU20-nk7hUpjLnSY8pKWO5oWOqYYQwnLSv_kutbX5EX0Uw1vDu8puf329fflj-7q5vvPy4urbpBSrt0g7Gh15Mh6oUHjKI3gvscRuBhDm0rBhI29gmBEEBADDKPAwDzvLYjAT8mHfe625IddqKubUx3CNPkl5F11Gi1DkPq_EA0osFI1-O4ZvM-7srRPONWiNFeKNYR7NJRcawnRbUuaffnrENxjBW5fgWsVuMcKnGk7bw_Bu34O49PG4eYNvD8AXwc_xeKXIdUn125jkYvmzvcu-uz8XWnm9hcD5ACWm3YW_g_R_JUX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>621073662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA isolation from soil samples for cloning in different hosts</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kauffmann, I.M ; Schmitt, J ; Schmid, R.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, I.M ; Schmitt, J ; Schmid, R.D</creatorcontrib><description>Many protocols to extract DNA directly from soil samples have been developed in recent years. We employed two extraction methods which differed in the method of lysis and compared these methods with respect to yield, purity and degree of shearing. The main focus was on the specific isolation of DNA from different microorganisms, especially DNA from actinomycetes, as these cells are very difficult to lyse, in contrast to non-actinomycetes. Thus, we used both methods to isolate DNA from Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter and Rhodococcus and from soil spiked with the respective microorganisms. Both methods rendered high DNA yields with a low degree of shearing, but differed in the type of cells that were lysed. By one protocol (utilizing enzymatic lysis) only DNA from the Gram-negative Pseudomonas strain could be obtained whereas, by the other protocol (utilizing mechanical lysis), all microorganisms that were used could be lysed and DNA extracted from them. Using a combination of both protocols, DNA from those organisms could be obtained selectively. Furthermore, one of the protocols was modified, resulting in higher DNA yield and purity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00253-003-1528-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14758515</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMBIDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Actinobacteria - genetics ; Actinomycetes ; Arthrobacter ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; Cloning ; Cloning, Molecular ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA, Bacterial - chemistry ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification ; extraction ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Gram-positive bacteria ; Methods ; Microorganisms ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Pseudomonas ; Rhodococcus ; RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - chemistry ; RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics ; soil bacteria ; soil biology ; Soil Microbiology ; Specimen Handling - methods</subject><ispartof>Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2004-06, Vol.64 (5), p.665-670</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-c49d97f312b47071d5843ab1d034de12b54249fb60e84e40fe0cd41e2a3b904e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/621073662/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/621073662?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15849134$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14758515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, I.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, R.D</creatorcontrib><title>DNA isolation from soil samples for cloning in different hosts</title><title>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</title><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><description>Many protocols to extract DNA directly from soil samples have been developed in recent years. We employed two extraction methods which differed in the method of lysis and compared these methods with respect to yield, purity and degree of shearing. The main focus was on the specific isolation of DNA from different microorganisms, especially DNA from actinomycetes, as these cells are very difficult to lyse, in contrast to non-actinomycetes. Thus, we used both methods to isolate DNA from Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter and Rhodococcus and from soil spiked with the respective microorganisms. Both methods rendered high DNA yields with a low degree of shearing, but differed in the type of cells that were lysed. By one protocol (utilizing enzymatic lysis) only DNA from the Gram-negative Pseudomonas strain could be obtained whereas, by the other protocol (utilizing mechanical lysis), all microorganisms that were used could be lysed and DNA extracted from them. Using a combination of both protocols, DNA from those organisms could be obtained selectively. Furthermore, one of the protocols was modified, resulting in higher DNA yield and purity.</description><subject>Actinobacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Actinomycetes</subject><subject>Arthrobacter</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Cloning, Molecular</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>extraction</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Rhodococcus</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - chemistry</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics</subject><subject>soil bacteria</subject><subject>soil biology</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><issn>0175-7598</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1rFTEUBuBQKvZa_QHd2CDobvScfGcjlPoJpV1o1yEzk9SUmcltMnfhvzflXih04ypweM4LOS8hZwgfEUB_qgBM8g6AdyiZ6cwR2aDgrAOF4phsALXstLTmhLyq9R4AmVHqJTlBoaWRKDfk85frC5pqnvya8kJjyTOtOU20-nk7hUpjLnSY8pKWO5oWOqYYQwnLSv_kutbX5EX0Uw1vDu8puf329fflj-7q5vvPy4urbpBSrt0g7Gh15Mh6oUHjKI3gvscRuBhDm0rBhI29gmBEEBADDKPAwDzvLYjAT8mHfe625IddqKubUx3CNPkl5F11Gi1DkPq_EA0osFI1-O4ZvM-7srRPONWiNFeKNYR7NJRcawnRbUuaffnrENxjBW5fgWsVuMcKnGk7bw_Bu34O49PG4eYNvD8AXwc_xeKXIdUn125jkYvmzvcu-uz8XWnm9hcD5ACWm3YW_g_R_JUX</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Kauffmann, I.M</creator><creator>Schmitt, J</creator><creator>Schmid, R.D</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>DNA isolation from soil samples for cloning in different hosts</title><author>Kauffmann, I.M ; Schmitt, J ; Schmid, R.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-c49d97f312b47071d5843ab1d034de12b54249fb60e84e40fe0cd41e2a3b904e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Actinobacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Actinomycetes</topic><topic>Arthrobacter</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Cloning, Molecular</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>extraction</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Rhodococcus</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - chemistry</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics</topic><topic>soil bacteria</topic><topic>soil biology</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, I.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, R.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauffmann, I.M</au><au>Schmitt, J</au><au>Schmid, R.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA isolation from soil samples for cloning in different hosts</atitle><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>665</spage><epage>670</epage><pages>665-670</pages><issn>0175-7598</issn><eissn>1432-0614</eissn><coden>AMBIDG</coden><abstract>Many protocols to extract DNA directly from soil samples have been developed in recent years. We employed two extraction methods which differed in the method of lysis and compared these methods with respect to yield, purity and degree of shearing. The main focus was on the specific isolation of DNA from different microorganisms, especially DNA from actinomycetes, as these cells are very difficult to lyse, in contrast to non-actinomycetes. Thus, we used both methods to isolate DNA from Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter and Rhodococcus and from soil spiked with the respective microorganisms. Both methods rendered high DNA yields with a low degree of shearing, but differed in the type of cells that were lysed. By one protocol (utilizing enzymatic lysis) only DNA from the Gram-negative Pseudomonas strain could be obtained whereas, by the other protocol (utilizing mechanical lysis), all microorganisms that were used could be lysed and DNA extracted from them. Using a combination of both protocols, DNA from those organisms could be obtained selectively. Furthermore, one of the protocols was modified, resulting in higher DNA yield and purity.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>14758515</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00253-003-1528-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0175-7598
ispartof Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2004-06, Vol.64 (5), p.665-670
issn 0175-7598
1432-0614
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71921057
source ABI/INFORM global; Springer Nature
subjects Actinobacteria - genetics
Actinomycetes
Arthrobacter
Biological and medical sciences
Biotechnology
Cloning
Cloning, Molecular
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA, Bacterial - chemistry
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification
extraction
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gram-negative bacteria
Gram-positive bacteria
Methods
Microorganisms
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Pseudomonas
Rhodococcus
RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - chemistry
RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics
soil bacteria
soil biology
Soil Microbiology
Specimen Handling - methods
title DNA isolation from soil samples for cloning in different hosts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20isolation%20from%20soil%20samples%20for%20cloning%20in%20different%20hosts&rft.jtitle=Applied%20microbiology%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Kauffmann,%20I.M&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=665&rft.epage=670&rft.pages=665-670&rft.issn=0175-7598&rft.eissn=1432-0614&rft.coden=AMBIDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00253-003-1528-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18060956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-c49d97f312b47071d5843ab1d034de12b54249fb60e84e40fe0cd41e2a3b904e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=621073662&rft_id=info:pmid/14758515&rfr_iscdi=true