Loading…

RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols

The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil sa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of microbiological methods 2002-10, Vol.51 (2), p.171-179
Main Authors: Sessitsch, Angela, Gyamfi, Stephen, Stralis-Pavese, Nancy, Weilharter, Alexandra, Pfeifer, Ulrike
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 171
container_title Journal of microbiological methods
container_volume 51
creator Sessitsch, Angela
Gyamfi, Stephen
Stralis-Pavese, Nancy
Weilharter, Alexandra
Pfeifer, Ulrike
description The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71930449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167701202000659</els_id><sourcerecordid>71930449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFTEQhYMoznX0EZSsRBetlaTTt-NGhsE_GBT8WYd0UoFId2dM0hfvM_jSpm9fdDlQVC3y1TlUDiFPGbxiwLrX32rbN3tg_AXwlwDQyUbdIzvW73nTC6nuk90_5II8yvknAJOi7R-SC8aZEB2oHfnz9fMVDTmOpoQ4U5_iRHMMI_Ux0cHYgimYkdo4TcscypGa2VG_zHbF64Op7ZhDfkPxYMZlU4meuuA9JpwLxd8lmRN-2j2J2zhnTIeNvk2xRBvH_Jg88GbM-OQ8L8mP9---X39sbr58-HR9ddNYyaA0ylnZDbaTyIUxvXIMOu64UmjrwWwAGIQTfDAGu17ZgQNIiZ55DyBa14pL8nzTrc6_FsxFTyFbHEczY1yy3jMloG3VnSDrWyk46ysoN9CmmHNCr29TmEw6agZ6jUuf4tJrFhpqrXHp1eDZ2WAZJnT_t875VODtBmD9j0PApLMNOFt0IaEt2sVwh8VfQ_Cn0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18453218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Sessitsch, Angela ; Gyamfi, Stephen ; Stralis-Pavese, Nancy ; Weilharter, Alexandra ; Pfeifer, Ulrike</creator><creatorcontrib>Sessitsch, Angela ; Gyamfi, Stephen ; Stralis-Pavese, Nancy ; Weilharter, Alexandra ; Pfeifer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12133609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>16S rRNA ; Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; RNA ; RNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Soil ; Soil Microbiology ; T-RFLP analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiological methods, 2002-10, Vol.51 (2), p.171-179</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12133609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sessitsch, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamfi, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weilharter, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><title>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</title><title>Journal of microbiological methods</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><description>The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation.</description><subject>16S rRNA</subject><subject>Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>T-RFLP analysis</subject><issn>0167-7012</issn><issn>1872-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2KFTEQhYMoznX0EZSsRBetlaTTt-NGhsE_GBT8WYd0UoFId2dM0hfvM_jSpm9fdDlQVC3y1TlUDiFPGbxiwLrX32rbN3tg_AXwlwDQyUbdIzvW73nTC6nuk90_5II8yvknAJOi7R-SC8aZEB2oHfnz9fMVDTmOpoQ4U5_iRHMMI_Ux0cHYgimYkdo4TcscypGa2VG_zHbF64Op7ZhDfkPxYMZlU4meuuA9JpwLxd8lmRN-2j2J2zhnTIeNvk2xRBvH_Jg88GbM-OQ8L8mP9---X39sbr58-HR9ddNYyaA0ylnZDbaTyIUxvXIMOu64UmjrwWwAGIQTfDAGu17ZgQNIiZ55DyBa14pL8nzTrc6_FsxFTyFbHEczY1yy3jMloG3VnSDrWyk46ysoN9CmmHNCr29TmEw6agZ6jUuf4tJrFhpqrXHp1eDZ2WAZJnT_t875VODtBmD9j0PApLMNOFt0IaEt2sVwh8VfQ_Cn0g</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Sessitsch, Angela</creator><creator>Gyamfi, Stephen</creator><creator>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</creator><creator>Weilharter, Alexandra</creator><creator>Pfeifer, Ulrike</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</title><author>Sessitsch, Angela ; Gyamfi, Stephen ; Stralis-Pavese, Nancy ; Weilharter, Alexandra ; Pfeifer, Ulrike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>16S rRNA</topic><topic>Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>T-RFLP analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sessitsch, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamfi, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weilharter, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sessitsch, Angela</au><au>Gyamfi, Stephen</au><au>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</au><au>Weilharter, Alexandra</au><au>Pfeifer, Ulrike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>171-179</pages><issn>0167-7012</issn><eissn>1872-8359</eissn><abstract>The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>12133609</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-7012
ispartof Journal of microbiological methods, 2002-10, Vol.51 (2), p.171-179
issn 0167-7012
1872-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71930449
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects 16S rRNA
Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics
Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA
RNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Soil
Soil Microbiology
T-RFLP analysis
title RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RNA%20isolation%20from%20soil%20for%20bacterial%20community%20and%20functional%20analysis:%20evaluation%20of%20different%20extraction%20and%20soil%20conservation%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiological%20methods&rft.au=Sessitsch,%20Angela&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=171-179&rft.issn=0167-7012&rft.eissn=1872-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71930449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18453218&rft_id=info:pmid/12133609&rfr_iscdi=true