Loading…
RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols
The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil sa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of microbiological methods 2002-10, Vol.51 (2), p.171-179 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43 |
container_end_page | 179 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | Journal of microbiological methods |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Sessitsch, Angela Gyamfi, Stephen Stralis-Pavese, Nancy Weilharter, Alexandra Pfeifer, Ulrike |
description | The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71930449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167701202000659</els_id><sourcerecordid>71930449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFTEQhYMoznX0EZSsRBetlaTTt-NGhsE_GBT8WYd0UoFId2dM0hfvM_jSpm9fdDlQVC3y1TlUDiFPGbxiwLrX32rbN3tg_AXwlwDQyUbdIzvW73nTC6nuk90_5II8yvknAJOi7R-SC8aZEB2oHfnz9fMVDTmOpoQ4U5_iRHMMI_Ux0cHYgimYkdo4TcscypGa2VG_zHbF64Op7ZhDfkPxYMZlU4meuuA9JpwLxd8lmRN-2j2J2zhnTIeNvk2xRBvH_Jg88GbM-OQ8L8mP9---X39sbr58-HR9ddNYyaA0ylnZDbaTyIUxvXIMOu64UmjrwWwAGIQTfDAGu17ZgQNIiZ55DyBa14pL8nzTrc6_FsxFTyFbHEczY1yy3jMloG3VnSDrWyk46ysoN9CmmHNCr29TmEw6agZ6jUuf4tJrFhpqrXHp1eDZ2WAZJnT_t875VODtBmD9j0PApLMNOFt0IaEt2sVwh8VfQ_Cn0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18453218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Sessitsch, Angela ; Gyamfi, Stephen ; Stralis-Pavese, Nancy ; Weilharter, Alexandra ; Pfeifer, Ulrike</creator><creatorcontrib>Sessitsch, Angela ; Gyamfi, Stephen ; Stralis-Pavese, Nancy ; Weilharter, Alexandra ; Pfeifer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12133609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>16S rRNA ; Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; RNA ; RNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Soil ; Soil Microbiology ; T-RFLP analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiological methods, 2002-10, Vol.51 (2), p.171-179</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12133609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sessitsch, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamfi, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weilharter, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><title>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</title><title>Journal of microbiological methods</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><description>The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation.</description><subject>16S rRNA</subject><subject>Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>T-RFLP analysis</subject><issn>0167-7012</issn><issn>1872-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2KFTEQhYMoznX0EZSsRBetlaTTt-NGhsE_GBT8WYd0UoFId2dM0hfvM_jSpm9fdDlQVC3y1TlUDiFPGbxiwLrX32rbN3tg_AXwlwDQyUbdIzvW73nTC6nuk90_5II8yvknAJOi7R-SC8aZEB2oHfnz9fMVDTmOpoQ4U5_iRHMMI_Ux0cHYgimYkdo4TcscypGa2VG_zHbF64Op7ZhDfkPxYMZlU4meuuA9JpwLxd8lmRN-2j2J2zhnTIeNvk2xRBvH_Jg88GbM-OQ8L8mP9---X39sbr58-HR9ddNYyaA0ylnZDbaTyIUxvXIMOu64UmjrwWwAGIQTfDAGu17ZgQNIiZ55DyBa14pL8nzTrc6_FsxFTyFbHEczY1yy3jMloG3VnSDrWyk46ysoN9CmmHNCr29TmEw6agZ6jUuf4tJrFhpqrXHp1eDZ2WAZJnT_t875VODtBmD9j0PApLMNOFt0IaEt2sVwh8VfQ_Cn0g</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Sessitsch, Angela</creator><creator>Gyamfi, Stephen</creator><creator>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</creator><creator>Weilharter, Alexandra</creator><creator>Pfeifer, Ulrike</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</title><author>Sessitsch, Angela ; Gyamfi, Stephen ; Stralis-Pavese, Nancy ; Weilharter, Alexandra ; Pfeifer, Ulrike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>16S rRNA</topic><topic>Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>T-RFLP analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sessitsch, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyamfi, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weilharter, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sessitsch, Angela</au><au>Gyamfi, Stephen</au><au>Stralis-Pavese, Nancy</au><au>Weilharter, Alexandra</au><au>Pfeifer, Ulrike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>171-179</pages><issn>0167-7012</issn><eissn>1872-8359</eissn><abstract>The impact of three different RNA isolation methods on the community analysis of metabolically active bacteria was determined by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes and subsequent terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Furthermore, soil samples were stored at different conditions in order to evaluate the effect of soil conservation methods on the outcome of the population analysis. The quality of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of eubacterial glutamine synthetase genes. Our results indicated that the community composition as well as the abundance of individual members were affected by the kind of RNA isolation method. Furthermore, the extraction method influenced the recovery of mRNA. Lyophilization, storage at −20 °C as well as storage in glycerol stocks at −80 °C proved to be equally appropriate for the storage of soils and subsequent RNA isolation.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>12133609</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-7012 |
ispartof | Journal of microbiological methods, 2002-10, Vol.51 (2), p.171-179 |
issn | 0167-7012 1872-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71930449 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | 16S rRNA Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase - genetics Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction RNA RNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Soil Soil Microbiology T-RFLP analysis |
title | RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RNA%20isolation%20from%20soil%20for%20bacterial%20community%20and%20functional%20analysis:%20evaluation%20of%20different%20extraction%20and%20soil%20conservation%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiological%20methods&rft.au=Sessitsch,%20Angela&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=171-179&rft.issn=0167-7012&rft.eissn=1872-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00065-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71930449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-9dc56bc65e23aa89d1062d299ec0161b00b3d32baae689cb20055ef1ff0034d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18453218&rft_id=info:pmid/12133609&rfr_iscdi=true |