Loading…

Usefulness of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography in the detection of ischemic cardiopathy

To assess the usefulness of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography (TEDSE), to identify patients with coronary artery disease. Patients referred for TEDSE with coronary angiography were included. Images were digitized in systolic cine-loop at baseline, with low dose-dobutamine (14.4 +/-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archivos de cardiología de México 2002-04, Vol.72 (2), p.105-114
Main Authors: Azpiri-López, José Ramón, Assad-Morell, José Luis, Hoyos-Pescador, Roxana, Loera-Torres, Javier, Flores-Coronado, Evangelina
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To assess the usefulness of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography (TEDSE), to identify patients with coronary artery disease. Patients referred for TEDSE with coronary angiography were included. Images were digitized in systolic cine-loop at baseline, with low dose-dobutamine (14.4 +/- 5 micrograms/kg/min), with high dose-dobutamine (28.7 +/- 10.5 micrograms/kg/min) and during recovery, and then analyzed by two observers. The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments according to coronary distribution, and the study was considered abnormal if there was a new or worsening of the segmental wall motion abnormality. Quantitative coronary angiographies were independently assessed, and lesions considered significant if they had > or = 70% diameter stenosis. Sixty eight patients were included. TEDSE sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 93%, 89.7%, and 91.1%, respectively. TEDSE correctly detected 7/7 single vessel disease and 20/22 multiple vessel disease patients. Twelve-lead ECG had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 38.3%, 91.8%, and 74.5% respectively, to detect the same lesions. TEDSE is feasible, safe, sensitive, and specific to detect significant coronary lesions. It should be considered in patients with suboptimal acoustic window or poor visualization of endocardial borders.
ISSN:1405-9940