Loading…
Social Rank Strategies in Hierarchical Relationships
Social rank theorists propose that threat appraisals evoke escalation behavior toward subordinates and de-escalation behavior toward superiors. These hypotheses were examined among records of behavior sampled ecologically from the work environments of 90 individuals. At the level of the event, situa...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2002-08, Vol.83 (2), p.425-433 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a394t-a66b4731ef8a7b0c2672ee786ec3982f05753c0d797706a0b247033f156ffd5f3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a394t-a66b4731ef8a7b0c2672ee786ec3982f05753c0d797706a0b247033f156ffd5f3 |
| container_end_page | 433 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 425 |
| container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
| container_volume | 83 |
| creator | Fournier, Marc A Moskowitz, D. S Zuroff, David C |
| description | Social rank theorists propose that threat appraisals evoke escalation behavior toward subordinates and de-escalation behavior toward superiors. These hypotheses were examined among records of behavior sampled ecologically from the work environments of 90 individuals. At the level of the event, situated threat appraisals (feeling criticized) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals tended to quarrel when criticized by subordinates and to submit when criticized by superiors. At the level of the person, aggregated rank appraisals (feeling inferior) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals who typically felt more inferior tended to quarrel more frequently with subordinates and to submit more frequently with superiors. Findings implicated inferiority and threat as fundamental dimensions underlying the behavior of the social rank system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.425 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71977029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71977029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a394t-a66b4731ef8a7b0c2672ee786ec3982f05753c0d797706a0b247033f156ffd5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d9rFDEQB_AgFnu2_Qd8kEPUF9nrTH5sso-lqBUKgm2fw1wusal7u2uy-9D_3ix3tCpinwLJZ2bIdxh7hbBCEPoUgPNKKJQrI1Z8Jbl6xhbYiKZCgeo5WzyAQ_Yy5zsAkIrzF-wQOSrgwiyYvOpdpHb5jbofy6sx0ei_R5-XsVteRJ8oudvo5nff0hj7Lt_GIR-zg0Bt9if784jdfPp4fX5RXX79_OX87LIi0cixorpeSy3QB0N6DY7XmnuvTe2daAwPoLQSDja60RpqgjWXGoQIqOoQNiqII_Z-13dI_c_J59FuY3a-banz_ZStxrmSN09C0UCZbWSBb_6Cd_2UuvIJW6MUWnHE_yEOjSnRY10Q3yGX-pyTD3ZIcUvp3iLYeT12Tt_O6VsjLLdlPaXo9b7ztN76zWPJfh8FvNsDyiX2kKhzMT86YUABzu7DztFAdsj3jtIYXeuzm1Ly3Vjuht_Hvv23_pP9AvnMsAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614375211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Rank Strategies in Hierarchical Relationships</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Fournier, Marc A ; Moskowitz, D. S ; Zuroff, David C</creator><contributor>Diener, Ed</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Marc A ; Moskowitz, D. S ; Zuroff, David C ; Diener, Ed</creatorcontrib><description>Social rank theorists propose that threat appraisals evoke escalation behavior toward subordinates and de-escalation behavior toward superiors. These hypotheses were examined among records of behavior sampled ecologically from the work environments of 90 individuals. At the level of the event, situated threat appraisals (feeling criticized) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals tended to quarrel when criticized by subordinates and to submit when criticized by superiors. At the level of the person, aggregated rank appraisals (feeling inferior) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals who typically felt more inferior tended to quarrel more frequently with subordinates and to submit more frequently with superiors. Findings implicated inferiority and threat as fundamental dimensions underlying the behavior of the social rank system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.425</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12150238</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Analysis of Variance ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cooperative Behavior ; Criticism ; Cues ; Dominance Hierarchy ; Dominance-Subordination ; Employee Interaction ; Employment ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hierarchy ; Hierarchy, Social ; Human ; Human behaviour ; Humans ; Interpersonal relations ; Linear Models ; Male ; Models, Psychological ; Professional relationships ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Risk ; Sex Factors ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Social status ; Social Structure ; Social systems ; Strategies ; Threat ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2002-08, Vol.83 (2), p.425-433</ispartof><rights>2002 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2002</rights><rights>2002, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a394t-a66b4731ef8a7b0c2672ee786ec3982f05753c0d797706a0b247033f156ffd5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a394t-a66b4731ef8a7b0c2672ee786ec3982f05753c0d797706a0b247033f156ffd5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33224,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13805018$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12150238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Diener, Ed</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Marc A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moskowitz, D. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuroff, David C</creatorcontrib><title>Social Rank Strategies in Hierarchical Relationships</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Social rank theorists propose that threat appraisals evoke escalation behavior toward subordinates and de-escalation behavior toward superiors. These hypotheses were examined among records of behavior sampled ecologically from the work environments of 90 individuals. At the level of the event, situated threat appraisals (feeling criticized) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals tended to quarrel when criticized by subordinates and to submit when criticized by superiors. At the level of the person, aggregated rank appraisals (feeling inferior) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals who typically felt more inferior tended to quarrel more frequently with subordinates and to submit more frequently with superiors. Findings implicated inferiority and threat as fundamental dimensions underlying the behavior of the social rank system.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dominance Hierarchy</subject><subject>Dominance-Subordination</subject><subject>Employee Interaction</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hierarchy</subject><subject>Hierarchy, Social</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Professional relationships</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social status</subject><subject>Social Structure</subject><subject>Social systems</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d9rFDEQB_AgFnu2_Qd8kEPUF9nrTH5sso-lqBUKgm2fw1wusal7u2uy-9D_3ix3tCpinwLJZ2bIdxh7hbBCEPoUgPNKKJQrI1Z8Jbl6xhbYiKZCgeo5WzyAQ_Yy5zsAkIrzF-wQOSrgwiyYvOpdpHb5jbofy6sx0ei_R5-XsVteRJ8oudvo5nff0hj7Lt_GIR-zg0Bt9if784jdfPp4fX5RXX79_OX87LIi0cixorpeSy3QB0N6DY7XmnuvTe2daAwPoLQSDja60RpqgjWXGoQIqOoQNiqII_Z-13dI_c_J59FuY3a-banz_ZStxrmSN09C0UCZbWSBb_6Cd_2UuvIJW6MUWnHE_yEOjSnRY10Q3yGX-pyTD3ZIcUvp3iLYeT12Tt_O6VsjLLdlPaXo9b7ztN76zWPJfh8FvNsDyiX2kKhzMT86YUABzu7DztFAdsj3jtIYXeuzm1Ly3Vjuht_Hvv23_pP9AvnMsAQ</recordid><startdate>200208</startdate><enddate>200208</enddate><creator>Fournier, Marc A</creator><creator>Moskowitz, D. S</creator><creator>Zuroff, David C</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200208</creationdate><title>Social Rank Strategies in Hierarchical Relationships</title><author>Fournier, Marc A ; Moskowitz, D. S ; Zuroff, David C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a394t-a66b4731ef8a7b0c2672ee786ec3982f05753c0d797706a0b247033f156ffd5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dominance Hierarchy</topic><topic>Dominance-Subordination</topic><topic>Employee Interaction</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hierarchy</topic><topic>Hierarchy, Social</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Professional relationships</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social status</topic><topic>Social Structure</topic><topic>Social systems</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Marc A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moskowitz, D. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuroff, David C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fournier, Marc A</au><au>Moskowitz, D. S</au><au>Zuroff, David C</au><au>Diener, Ed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Rank Strategies in Hierarchical Relationships</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2002-08</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>425-433</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>Social rank theorists propose that threat appraisals evoke escalation behavior toward subordinates and de-escalation behavior toward superiors. These hypotheses were examined among records of behavior sampled ecologically from the work environments of 90 individuals. At the level of the event, situated threat appraisals (feeling criticized) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals tended to quarrel when criticized by subordinates and to submit when criticized by superiors. At the level of the person, aggregated rank appraisals (feeling inferior) predicted different kinds of behavior across status situations. Individuals who typically felt more inferior tended to quarrel more frequently with subordinates and to submit more frequently with superiors. Findings implicated inferiority and threat as fundamental dimensions underlying the behavior of the social rank system.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>12150238</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.425</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
| ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 2002-08, Vol.83 (2), p.425-433 |
| issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71977029 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PsycArticles (EBSCO); Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Aggression Analysis of Variance Behavior Biological and medical sciences Cooperative Behavior Criticism Cues Dominance Hierarchy Dominance-Subordination Employee Interaction Employment Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hierarchy Hierarchy, Social Human Human behaviour Humans Interpersonal relations Linear Models Male Models, Psychological Professional relationships Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Risk Sex Factors Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology Social status Social Structure Social systems Strategies Threat Work environment |
| title | Social Rank Strategies in Hierarchical Relationships |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Rank%20Strategies%20in%20Hierarchical%20Relationships&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Fournier,%20Marc%20A&rft.date=2002-08&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=425-433&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.425&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71977029%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a394t-a66b4731ef8a7b0c2672ee786ec3982f05753c0d797706a0b247033f156ffd5f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614375211&rft_id=info:pmid/12150238&rfr_iscdi=true |