Loading…

Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies

To evaluate the rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and long-term results in different levels of anti-HLA sensitization, using noninduction or different induction therapies, 763 patients who underwent transplantation from January 1995 to December 2001 were evaluated: 213 patients received inducti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transplantation proceedings 2004-05, Vol.36 (4), p.874-876
Main Authors: Castro, M.C.R, Araujo, L.M.P, Nahas, W.C, Arap, S, David-Neto, E, Ianhez, L.E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ce0814b8e697cdbeca84d2e452fd228ee1643a64d3f7ba479f04f0e8616124483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ce0814b8e697cdbeca84d2e452fd228ee1643a64d3f7ba479f04f0e8616124483
container_end_page 876
container_issue 4
container_start_page 874
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 36
creator Castro, M.C.R
Araujo, L.M.P
Nahas, W.C
Arap, S
David-Neto, E
Ianhez, L.E
description To evaluate the rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and long-term results in different levels of anti-HLA sensitization, using noninduction or different induction therapies, 763 patients who underwent transplantation from January 1995 to December 2001 were evaluated: 213 patients received induction therapy, 71 received Thymoglobulin (Thymo), 66 Simulect, and 44 OKT3. Follow-up time was at least 1 year for all groups. The Simulect group included older recipients and the OKT3 group had more female patients. Simulect and OKT3 groups had more black patients; Thymo and OKT3 groups had more retransplantations. PRA was low in the noninduction group (mean, 7%) and about the same in the Simulect and Thymo groups (mean, 30%). OKT3 was the most sensitized group (mean = 59%). Dialysis during the first posttransplantation week was more frequent among the induction groups (43% vs 65%; P < .005). Fewer patients experienced rejection episodes in the Thymo group (20% vs 50%; P = .02). Patients were classified according to their level of sensitization, and the Thymo group showed the lower rejection rates in all levels (mean, 20%; P = .001). When analyzing PRA >50%, the Thymo group showed lower rejection rates (12% vs 50%; P = .02). At this level of sensitization, there was no significant difference on graft loss and death with a functioning graft. There was a trend to more cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the Thymo group (33% vs 23%; P = .08). Two PTLD were diagnosed, both in the noninduction group. Renal function was better in the Thymo group (1.3 mg/dL). In conclusion, Thymo showed lower ACR rates in all PRA groups. No significant differences in CMV infection, tumors, and patient survival were observed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.084
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72016628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004113450400346X</els_id><sourcerecordid>72016628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ce0814b8e697cdbeca84d2e452fd228ee1643a64d3f7ba479f04f0e8616124483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2LEzEUhoMobnf1L0gQ9G7GfDWT2btldXVhQRG9DmlyoqnTTM2ZKfTaP25Ky1K88iok73M-8r6EvOas5Yzrd-t2Ki7jtoweILSCMdUy2TKjnpAFN51shBbyKVlUgTdcquUFuURcs3oXSj4nF3zJeyX6fkH-3Ocw-ymNme6g4Iw0jzk9vk0_objtnqZMf6WQYU-PoweXJ3cgrqkfM6YAJeUfNKQYoUCe6JevN3SAHQxIXQ5nwr-9E-AL8iy6AeHl6bwi3-8-fLv91Dx8_nh_e_PQeMX01HhghquVAd13PqzAO6OCALUUMQhhALhW0mkVZOxWTnV9ZCoyMJprLpQy8oq8Pfatzv2eASe7SehhqJ-BcUbbiequFgfw-gj6MiIWiHZb0saVveXMHiKwa3segT1EYJm0NYJa_Oo0ZV5tqvZYevK8Am9OgEPvhlgb-YRnnOmY5l3l3h-5aiLsEhSLPkH2EFIBP9kwpv_Z5y8eia_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72016628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Castro, M.C.R ; Araujo, L.M.P ; Nahas, W.C ; Arap, S ; David-Neto, E ; Ianhez, L.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Castro, M.C.R ; Araujo, L.M.P ; Nahas, W.C ; Arap, S ; David-Neto, E ; Ianhez, L.E</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and long-term results in different levels of anti-HLA sensitization, using noninduction or different induction therapies, 763 patients who underwent transplantation from January 1995 to December 2001 were evaluated: 213 patients received induction therapy, 71 received Thymoglobulin (Thymo), 66 Simulect, and 44 OKT3. Follow-up time was at least 1 year for all groups. The Simulect group included older recipients and the OKT3 group had more female patients. Simulect and OKT3 groups had more black patients; Thymo and OKT3 groups had more retransplantations. PRA was low in the noninduction group (mean, 7%) and about the same in the Simulect and Thymo groups (mean, 30%). OKT3 was the most sensitized group (mean = 59%). Dialysis during the first posttransplantation week was more frequent among the induction groups (43% vs 65%; P &lt; .005). Fewer patients experienced rejection episodes in the Thymo group (20% vs 50%; P = .02). Patients were classified according to their level of sensitization, and the Thymo group showed the lower rejection rates in all levels (mean, 20%; P = .001). When analyzing PRA &gt;50%, the Thymo group showed lower rejection rates (12% vs 50%; P = .02). At this level of sensitization, there was no significant difference on graft loss and death with a functioning graft. There was a trend to more cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the Thymo group (33% vs 23%; P = .08). Two PTLD were diagnosed, both in the noninduction group. Renal function was better in the Thymo group (1.3 mg/dL). In conclusion, Thymo showed lower ACR rates in all PRA groups. No significant differences in CMV infection, tumors, and patient survival were observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15194299</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPPA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Graft Rejection - classification ; Graft Rejection - pathology ; Humans ; Immunosuppression - methods ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Isoantibodies - blood ; Kidney Transplantation - immunology ; Kidney Transplantation - pathology ; Kidney Transplantation - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Postoperative Period ; Renal Replacement Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Transplantation Conditioning</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2004-05, Vol.36 (4), p.874-876</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ce0814b8e697cdbeca84d2e452fd228ee1643a64d3f7ba479f04f0e8616124483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ce0814b8e697cdbeca84d2e452fd228ee1643a64d3f7ba479f04f0e8616124483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15870617$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15194299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castro, M.C.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, L.M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahas, W.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arap, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David-Neto, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianhez, L.E</creatorcontrib><title>Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>To evaluate the rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and long-term results in different levels of anti-HLA sensitization, using noninduction or different induction therapies, 763 patients who underwent transplantation from January 1995 to December 2001 were evaluated: 213 patients received induction therapy, 71 received Thymoglobulin (Thymo), 66 Simulect, and 44 OKT3. Follow-up time was at least 1 year for all groups. The Simulect group included older recipients and the OKT3 group had more female patients. Simulect and OKT3 groups had more black patients; Thymo and OKT3 groups had more retransplantations. PRA was low in the noninduction group (mean, 7%) and about the same in the Simulect and Thymo groups (mean, 30%). OKT3 was the most sensitized group (mean = 59%). Dialysis during the first posttransplantation week was more frequent among the induction groups (43% vs 65%; P &lt; .005). Fewer patients experienced rejection episodes in the Thymo group (20% vs 50%; P = .02). Patients were classified according to their level of sensitization, and the Thymo group showed the lower rejection rates in all levels (mean, 20%; P = .001). When analyzing PRA &gt;50%, the Thymo group showed lower rejection rates (12% vs 50%; P = .02). At this level of sensitization, there was no significant difference on graft loss and death with a functioning graft. There was a trend to more cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the Thymo group (33% vs 23%; P = .08). Two PTLD were diagnosed, both in the noninduction group. Renal function was better in the Thymo group (1.3 mg/dL). In conclusion, Thymo showed lower ACR rates in all PRA groups. No significant differences in CMV infection, tumors, and patient survival were observed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - classification</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppression - methods</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Isoantibodies - blood</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - immunology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Renal Replacement Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Transplantation Conditioning</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV2LEzEUhoMobnf1L0gQ9G7GfDWT2btldXVhQRG9DmlyoqnTTM2ZKfTaP25Ky1K88iok73M-8r6EvOas5Yzrd-t2Ki7jtoweILSCMdUy2TKjnpAFN51shBbyKVlUgTdcquUFuURcs3oXSj4nF3zJeyX6fkH-3Ocw-ymNme6g4Iw0jzk9vk0_objtnqZMf6WQYU-PoweXJ3cgrqkfM6YAJeUfNKQYoUCe6JevN3SAHQxIXQ5nwr-9E-AL8iy6AeHl6bwi3-8-fLv91Dx8_nh_e_PQeMX01HhghquVAd13PqzAO6OCALUUMQhhALhW0mkVZOxWTnV9ZCoyMJprLpQy8oq8Pfatzv2eASe7SehhqJ-BcUbbiequFgfw-gj6MiIWiHZb0saVveXMHiKwa3segT1EYJm0NYJa_Oo0ZV5tqvZYevK8Am9OgEPvhlgb-YRnnOmY5l3l3h-5aiLsEhSLPkH2EFIBP9kwpv_Z5y8eia_I</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Castro, M.C.R</creator><creator>Araujo, L.M.P</creator><creator>Nahas, W.C</creator><creator>Arap, S</creator><creator>David-Neto, E</creator><creator>Ianhez, L.E</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies</title><author>Castro, M.C.R ; Araujo, L.M.P ; Nahas, W.C ; Arap, S ; David-Neto, E ; Ianhez, L.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ce0814b8e697cdbeca84d2e452fd228ee1643a64d3f7ba479f04f0e8616124483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - classification</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppression - methods</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Isoantibodies - blood</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - immunology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Renal Replacement Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Transplantation Conditioning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castro, M.C.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, L.M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahas, W.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arap, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David-Neto, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianhez, L.E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castro, M.C.R</au><au>Araujo, L.M.P</au><au>Nahas, W.C</au><au>Arap, S</au><au>David-Neto, E</au><au>Ianhez, L.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>874</spage><epage>876</epage><pages>874-876</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><coden>TRPPA8</coden><abstract>To evaluate the rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and long-term results in different levels of anti-HLA sensitization, using noninduction or different induction therapies, 763 patients who underwent transplantation from January 1995 to December 2001 were evaluated: 213 patients received induction therapy, 71 received Thymoglobulin (Thymo), 66 Simulect, and 44 OKT3. Follow-up time was at least 1 year for all groups. The Simulect group included older recipients and the OKT3 group had more female patients. Simulect and OKT3 groups had more black patients; Thymo and OKT3 groups had more retransplantations. PRA was low in the noninduction group (mean, 7%) and about the same in the Simulect and Thymo groups (mean, 30%). OKT3 was the most sensitized group (mean = 59%). Dialysis during the first posttransplantation week was more frequent among the induction groups (43% vs 65%; P &lt; .005). Fewer patients experienced rejection episodes in the Thymo group (20% vs 50%; P = .02). Patients were classified according to their level of sensitization, and the Thymo group showed the lower rejection rates in all levels (mean, 20%; P = .001). When analyzing PRA &gt;50%, the Thymo group showed lower rejection rates (12% vs 50%; P = .02). At this level of sensitization, there was no significant difference on graft loss and death with a functioning graft. There was a trend to more cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the Thymo group (33% vs 23%; P = .08). Two PTLD were diagnosed, both in the noninduction group. Renal function was better in the Thymo group (1.3 mg/dL). In conclusion, Thymo showed lower ACR rates in all PRA groups. No significant differences in CMV infection, tumors, and patient survival were observed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15194299</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.084</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2004-05, Vol.36 (4), p.874-876
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72016628
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Drug Administration Schedule
Graft Rejection - classification
Graft Rejection - pathology
Humans
Immunosuppression - methods
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Isoantibodies - blood
Kidney Transplantation - immunology
Kidney Transplantation - pathology
Kidney Transplantation - physiology
Medical sciences
Postoperative Period
Renal Replacement Therapy - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Transplantation Conditioning
title Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A31%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induction%20versus%20noninduction%20therapy%20in%20kidney%20transplantation:%20considering%20different%20PRA%20levels%20and%20different%20induction%20therapies&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Castro,%20M.C.R&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=874&rft.epage=876&rft.pages=874-876&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft.coden=TRPPA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72016628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ce0814b8e697cdbeca84d2e452fd228ee1643a64d3f7ba479f04f0e8616124483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72016628&rft_id=info:pmid/15194299&rfr_iscdi=true