Driving simulator validation for speed research

The behavioral validation of an advanced driving simulator for its use in evaluating speeding countermeasures was performed for mean speed. Using mature drivers, 24 participants drove an instrumented car and 20 participants drove the simulator in two separate experiments. Participants drove on roads...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accident analysis and prevention 2002-09, Vol.34 (5), p.589-600
Main Authors: Godley, Stuart T, Triggs, Thomas J, Fildes, Brian N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Automobile Driving
Deceleration
Driving simulator
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Simulation
Speed
Task Performance and Analysis
Validation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-59711800894976139269c6cf4af4c5dcb32581148a5cb52430c8ccf5bb950e5e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-59711800894976139269c6cf4af4c5dcb32581148a5cb52430c8ccf5bb950e5e3
container_end_page 600
container_issue 5
container_start_page 589
container_title Accident analysis and prevention
container_volume 34
creator Godley, Stuart T
Triggs, Thomas J
Fildes, Brian N
description The behavioral validation of an advanced driving simulator for its use in evaluating speeding countermeasures was performed for mean speed. Using mature drivers, 24 participants drove an instrumented car and 20 participants drove the simulator in two separate experiments. Participants drove on roads which contained transverse rumble strips at three sites, as well as three equivalent control sites. The three pairs of sites involved deceleration, and were the approaches to stop sign intersections, right curves, and left curves. Numerical correspondence (absolute validity), relative correspondence (or validity), and interactive (or dynamic) relative validity were analyzed, the latter using correlations developed from canonical correlation. Participants reacted to the rumble strips, in relation to their deceleration pattern on the control road, in very similar ways in both the instrumented car and simulator experiments, establishing the relative validities. However, participants generally drove faster in the instrumented car than the simulator, resulting in absolute validity not being established.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00056-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72062055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001457501000562</els_id><sourcerecordid>27124060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-59711800894976139269c6cf4af4c5dcb32581148a5cb52430c8ccf5bb950e5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BGVPoodqJs00zUlk_QTBg3oOaTrVSHe7Ju2C_97oLnrc0_DC884wD2NHwM-BQ3HxzDmHTKLCUw5nKWCRiS02glLpTHBU22z0h-yx_Rg_UlSlwl22B0KA1JiP2MV18Es_f5tEPxta23dhsrStr23vu_mkSTEuiOpJoEg2uPcDttPYNtLheo7Z6-3Ny_Q-e3y6e5hePWYOJfQZagVQcl5qqVUBuRaFdoVrpG2kw9pVucASQJYWXYVC5tyVzjVYVRo5IeVjdrLauwjd50CxNzMfHbWtnVM3RKMEL9KXuBEUCoTkBd8IQpmMaFAJxBXoQhdjoMYsgp_Z8GWAmx_35te9-RFr0vx1b0TqHa8PDNWM6v_WWnYCLlcAJXFLT8FE52nuqPaBXG_qzm848Q1VGpEC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18495917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Driving simulator validation for speed research</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Godley, Stuart T ; Triggs, Thomas J ; Fildes, Brian N</creator><creatorcontrib>Godley, Stuart T ; Triggs, Thomas J ; Fildes, Brian N</creatorcontrib><description>The behavioral validation of an advanced driving simulator for its use in evaluating speeding countermeasures was performed for mean speed. Using mature drivers, 24 participants drove an instrumented car and 20 participants drove the simulator in two separate experiments. Participants drove on roads which contained transverse rumble strips at three sites, as well as three equivalent control sites. The three pairs of sites involved deceleration, and were the approaches to stop sign intersections, right curves, and left curves. Numerical correspondence (absolute validity), relative correspondence (or validity), and interactive (or dynamic) relative validity were analyzed, the latter using correlations developed from canonical correlation. Participants reacted to the rumble strips, in relation to their deceleration pattern on the control road, in very similar ways in both the instrumented car and simulator experiments, establishing the relative validities. However, participants generally drove faster in the instrumented car than the simulator, resulting in absolute validity not being established.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00056-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12214953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Automobile Driving ; Deceleration ; Driving simulator ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Simulation ; Speed ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2002-09, Vol.34 (5), p.589-600</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-59711800894976139269c6cf4af4c5dcb32581148a5cb52430c8ccf5bb950e5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-59711800894976139269c6cf4af4c5dcb32581148a5cb52430c8ccf5bb950e5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12214953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Godley, Stuart T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triggs, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fildes, Brian N</creatorcontrib><title>Driving simulator validation for speed research</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>The behavioral validation of an advanced driving simulator for its use in evaluating speeding countermeasures was performed for mean speed. Using mature drivers, 24 participants drove an instrumented car and 20 participants drove the simulator in two separate experiments. Participants drove on roads which contained transverse rumble strips at three sites, as well as three equivalent control sites. The three pairs of sites involved deceleration, and were the approaches to stop sign intersections, right curves, and left curves. Numerical correspondence (absolute validity), relative correspondence (or validity), and interactive (or dynamic) relative validity were analyzed, the latter using correlations developed from canonical correlation. Participants reacted to the rumble strips, in relation to their deceleration pattern on the control road, in very similar ways in both the instrumented car and simulator experiments, establishing the relative validities. However, participants generally drove faster in the instrumented car than the simulator, resulting in absolute validity not being established.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Automobile Driving</subject><subject>Deceleration</subject><subject>Driving simulator</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Speed</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BGVPoodqJs00zUlk_QTBg3oOaTrVSHe7Ju2C_97oLnrc0_DC884wD2NHwM-BQ3HxzDmHTKLCUw5nKWCRiS02glLpTHBU22z0h-yx_Rg_UlSlwl22B0KA1JiP2MV18Es_f5tEPxta23dhsrStr23vu_mkSTEuiOpJoEg2uPcDttPYNtLheo7Z6-3Ny_Q-e3y6e5hePWYOJfQZagVQcl5qqVUBuRaFdoVrpG2kw9pVucASQJYWXYVC5tyVzjVYVRo5IeVjdrLauwjd50CxNzMfHbWtnVM3RKMEL9KXuBEUCoTkBd8IQpmMaFAJxBXoQhdjoMYsgp_Z8GWAmx_35te9-RFr0vx1b0TqHa8PDNWM6v_WWnYCLlcAJXFLT8FE52nuqPaBXG_qzm848Q1VGpEC</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Godley, Stuart T</creator><creator>Triggs, Thomas J</creator><creator>Fildes, Brian N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Driving simulator validation for speed research</title><author>Godley, Stuart T ; Triggs, Thomas J ; Fildes, Brian N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-59711800894976139269c6cf4af4c5dcb32581148a5cb52430c8ccf5bb950e5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Automobile Driving</topic><topic>Deceleration</topic><topic>Driving simulator</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Speed</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Godley, Stuart T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triggs, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fildes, Brian N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Godley, Stuart T</au><au>Triggs, Thomas J</au><au>Fildes, Brian N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Driving simulator validation for speed research</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>589</spage><epage>600</epage><pages>589-600</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>The behavioral validation of an advanced driving simulator for its use in evaluating speeding countermeasures was performed for mean speed. Using mature drivers, 24 participants drove an instrumented car and 20 participants drove the simulator in two separate experiments. Participants drove on roads which contained transverse rumble strips at three sites, as well as three equivalent control sites. The three pairs of sites involved deceleration, and were the approaches to stop sign intersections, right curves, and left curves. Numerical correspondence (absolute validity), relative correspondence (or validity), and interactive (or dynamic) relative validity were analyzed, the latter using correlations developed from canonical correlation. Participants reacted to the rumble strips, in relation to their deceleration pattern on the control road, in very similar ways in both the instrumented car and simulator experiments, establishing the relative validities. However, participants generally drove faster in the instrumented car than the simulator, resulting in absolute validity not being established.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12214953</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00056-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4575
ispartof Accident analysis and prevention, 2002-09, Vol.34 (5), p.589-600
issn 0001-4575
1879-2057
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72062055
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Automobile Driving
Deceleration
Driving simulator
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Simulation
Speed
Task Performance and Analysis
Validation
title Driving simulator validation for speed research
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Driving%20simulator%20validation%20for%20speed%20research&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Godley,%20Stuart%20T&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=589&rft.epage=600&rft.pages=589-600&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00056-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27124060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-59711800894976139269c6cf4af4c5dcb32581148a5cb52430c8ccf5bb950e5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18495917&rft_id=info:pmid/12214953&rfr_iscdi=true