Loading…

Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) was recorded in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) in response to clicks and tones. The typical budgerigar ABR waveform showed two prominent peaks occurring within 4 ms of the stimulus onset. As sound-pressure levels increased, ABR peak latency decrease...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002-09, Vol.112 (3 Pt 1), p.999-1008
Main Authors: Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F, Dooling, Robert J, Gleich, Otto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ad482aef833ca391ba3c4245f7066671585233f2e36ec8b92e50a531008f64573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ad482aef833ca391ba3c4245f7066671585233f2e36ec8b92e50a531008f64573
container_end_page 1008
container_issue 3 Pt 1
container_start_page 999
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 112
creator Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F
Dooling, Robert J
Gleich, Otto
description The auditory brainstem response (ABR) was recorded in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) in response to clicks and tones. The typical budgerigar ABR waveform showed two prominent peaks occurring within 4 ms of the stimulus onset. As sound-pressure levels increased, ABR peak latency decreased, and peak amplitude increased for all waves while interwave interval remained relatively constant. While ABR thresholds were about 30 dB higher than behavioral thresholds, the shape of the budgerigar audiogram derived from the ABR closely paralleled that of the behavioral audiogram. Based on the ABR, budgerigars hear best between 1000 and 5700 Hz with best sensitivity at 2860 Hz-the frequency corresponding to the peak frequency in budgerigar vocalizations. The latency of ABR peaks increased and amplitude decreased with increasing repetition rate. This rate-dependent latency increase is greater for wave 2 as indicated by the latency increase in the interwave interval. Generally, changes in the ABR to stimulation intensity, frequency, and repetition rate are comparable to what has been found in other vertebrates.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.1494807
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72113728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18605825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ad482aef833ca391ba3c4245f7066671585233f2e36ec8b92e50a531008f64573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK0u_AOSldhF6tx5ZbIsxRdW3Og6TCaTEsnLuTOL_nsjLbiUuzhc-DgcPkKuga4AGNzDCkQuNM1OyBwko6mWTJySOaUUUpErNSMXiF_TKzXPz8kMGBMcdD4nr-tYNWHw-6T0pukxuC7xDsehR4dJ0yemim1IyljtnG92xmNy9-baYcQmBGMjJrGfCBMiLi_JWW1adFfHXJDPx4ePzXO6fX962ay3qRXAQ2oqoZlxtebcGp5DabgVTMg6o0qpDOS0nvOaOa6c1WXOnKRGcqBU10rIjC_I7aF39MN3dBiKrkHr2tb0bohYZAyAZ0z_C4JWkxEmJ3B5AK0fEL2ri9E3nfH7Amjxq7iY7qB4Ym-OpbHsXPVHHp3yH0uEdQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18605825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F ; Dooling, Robert J ; Gleich, Otto</creator><creatorcontrib>Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F ; Dooling, Robert J ; Gleich, Otto</creatorcontrib><description>The auditory brainstem response (ABR) was recorded in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) in response to clicks and tones. The typical budgerigar ABR waveform showed two prominent peaks occurring within 4 ms of the stimulus onset. As sound-pressure levels increased, ABR peak latency decreased, and peak amplitude increased for all waves while interwave interval remained relatively constant. While ABR thresholds were about 30 dB higher than behavioral thresholds, the shape of the budgerigar audiogram derived from the ABR closely paralleled that of the behavioral audiogram. Based on the ABR, budgerigars hear best between 1000 and 5700 Hz with best sensitivity at 2860 Hz-the frequency corresponding to the peak frequency in budgerigar vocalizations. The latency of ABR peaks increased and amplitude decreased with increasing repetition rate. This rate-dependent latency increase is greater for wave 2 as indicated by the latency increase in the interwave interval. Generally, changes in the ABR to stimulation intensity, frequency, and repetition rate are comparable to what has been found in other vertebrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.1494807</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12243189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Animals ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Brain Stem - physiology ; Cochlear Microphonic Potentials - physiology ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology ; Habituation, Psychophysiologic - physiology ; Loudness Perception - physiology ; Parrots - physiology ; Pitch Discrimination - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reference Values ; Sound Spectrography</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002-09, Vol.112 (3 Pt 1), p.999-1008</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ad482aef833ca391ba3c4245f7066671585233f2e36ec8b92e50a531008f64573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ad482aef833ca391ba3c4245f7066671585233f2e36ec8b92e50a531008f64573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12243189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dooling, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleich, Otto</creatorcontrib><title>Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>The auditory brainstem response (ABR) was recorded in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) in response to clicks and tones. The typical budgerigar ABR waveform showed two prominent peaks occurring within 4 ms of the stimulus onset. As sound-pressure levels increased, ABR peak latency decreased, and peak amplitude increased for all waves while interwave interval remained relatively constant. While ABR thresholds were about 30 dB higher than behavioral thresholds, the shape of the budgerigar audiogram derived from the ABR closely paralleled that of the behavioral audiogram. Based on the ABR, budgerigars hear best between 1000 and 5700 Hz with best sensitivity at 2860 Hz-the frequency corresponding to the peak frequency in budgerigar vocalizations. The latency of ABR peaks increased and amplitude decreased with increasing repetition rate. This rate-dependent latency increase is greater for wave 2 as indicated by the latency increase in the interwave interval. Generally, changes in the ABR to stimulation intensity, frequency, and repetition rate are comparable to what has been found in other vertebrates.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Cochlear Microphonic Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Habituation, Psychophysiologic - physiology</subject><subject>Loudness Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Parrots - physiology</subject><subject>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK0u_AOSldhF6tx5ZbIsxRdW3Og6TCaTEsnLuTOL_nsjLbiUuzhc-DgcPkKuga4AGNzDCkQuNM1OyBwko6mWTJySOaUUUpErNSMXiF_TKzXPz8kMGBMcdD4nr-tYNWHw-6T0pukxuC7xDsehR4dJ0yemim1IyljtnG92xmNy9-baYcQmBGMjJrGfCBMiLi_JWW1adFfHXJDPx4ePzXO6fX962ay3qRXAQ2oqoZlxtebcGp5DabgVTMg6o0qpDOS0nvOaOa6c1WXOnKRGcqBU10rIjC_I7aF39MN3dBiKrkHr2tb0bohYZAyAZ0z_C4JWkxEmJ3B5AK0fEL2ri9E3nfH7Amjxq7iY7qB4Ym-OpbHsXPVHHp3yH0uEdQo</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F</creator><creator>Dooling, Robert J</creator><creator>Gleich, Otto</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)</title><author>Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F ; Dooling, Robert J ; Gleich, Otto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ad482aef833ca391ba3c4245f7066671585233f2e36ec8b92e50a531008f64573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Cochlear Microphonic Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Habituation, Psychophysiologic - physiology</topic><topic>Loudness Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Parrots - physiology</topic><topic>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dooling, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleich, Otto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brittan-Powell, Elizabeth F</au><au>Dooling, Robert J</au><au>Gleich, Otto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>3 Pt 1</issue><spage>999</spage><epage>1008</epage><pages>999-1008</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>The auditory brainstem response (ABR) was recorded in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) in response to clicks and tones. The typical budgerigar ABR waveform showed two prominent peaks occurring within 4 ms of the stimulus onset. As sound-pressure levels increased, ABR peak latency decreased, and peak amplitude increased for all waves while interwave interval remained relatively constant. While ABR thresholds were about 30 dB higher than behavioral thresholds, the shape of the budgerigar audiogram derived from the ABR closely paralleled that of the behavioral audiogram. Based on the ABR, budgerigars hear best between 1000 and 5700 Hz with best sensitivity at 2860 Hz-the frequency corresponding to the peak frequency in budgerigar vocalizations. The latency of ABR peaks increased and amplitude decreased with increasing repetition rate. This rate-dependent latency increase is greater for wave 2 as indicated by the latency increase in the interwave interval. Generally, changes in the ABR to stimulation intensity, frequency, and repetition rate are comparable to what has been found in other vertebrates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12243189</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.1494807</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002-09, Vol.112 (3 Pt 1), p.999-1008
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72113728
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Animals
Auditory Threshold - physiology
Brain Stem - physiology
Cochlear Microphonic Potentials - physiology
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology
Habituation, Psychophysiologic - physiology
Loudness Perception - physiology
Parrots - physiology
Pitch Discrimination - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Reference Values
Sound Spectrography
title Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A09%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditory%20brainstem%20responses%20in%20adult%20budgerigars%20(Melopsittacus%20undulatus)&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Brittan-Powell,%20Elizabeth%20F&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=3%20Pt%201&rft.spage=999&rft.epage=1008&rft.pages=999-1008&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.1494807&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18605825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ad482aef833ca391ba3c4245f7066671585233f2e36ec8b92e50a531008f64573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18605825&rft_id=info:pmid/12243189&rfr_iscdi=true