Loading…
Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia: Results of Technical Variations in the Charnley-Williams Procedure
BackgroundResults of the Charnley-Williams method of intramedullary fixation for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia have varied, in part because of variations in surgical technique. The outcomes of three variations of this procedure were compared to determine which technique was the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2002-10, Vol.84 (10), p.1799-1810 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b070dd1452a1ca3eb643ffc0eac47dda5702d96602c686dec1790e3542f307b3 |
container_end_page | 1810 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1799 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Johnston, Charles E |
description | BackgroundResults of the Charnley-Williams method of intramedullary fixation for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia have varied, in part because of variations in surgical technique. The outcomes of three variations of this procedure were compared to determine which technique was the most likely to result in union.MethodsThe results in twenty-three consecutive patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia were reviewed at four to fourteen years following initial surgical treatment with an intramedullary rod. Three types of procedures were performedtype A, which consisted of resection of the tibial pseudarthrosis with shortening, insertion of an intramedullary rod into the tibia, and tibial bone-grafting combined with fibular resection or osteotomy and insertion of an intramedullary rod into the fibula; type B, which was identical to type A except that it did not include fibular fixation; and type C, which consisted of insertion of a tibial rod and bone-grafting but no fibular surgery. The outcome was classified as grade 1 when there was unequivocal union with full weight-bearing function and maintenance of alignment requiring no additional surgical treatment; grade 2 when there was equivocal union with useful function, with the limb protected by a brace, and/or valgus or sagittal bowing for which additional surgery was required or anticipated; and grade 3 when there was persistent nonunion or refracture, requiring full-time external support for pain and/or instability.ResultsEleven patients (48%) ultimately had a grade-1 outcome; nine, a grade-2 outcome; and three, a grade-3 outcome. The final outcome was not associated with either the initial radiographic appearance of the lesion or the age of the patient at the time of the initial surgery. The results following type-A and B operations were better than those after type-C procedures. Surgery on an intact fibula resulted in a lower prevalence of grade-3 outcomes than was found when an intact fibula was not operated on (p = 0.05). Transfixation of the ankle joint by the intramedullary rod did not decrease the prevalence of grade-3 outcomes.ConclusionsThere is little justification for a type-C operation, as it either resulted in a persistent nonunion or failed to improve an equivocal outcome in every case. Leaving an intact fibula undisturbed to maintain stability or length also was not successful in this series. In addition, the presence of fibular insufficiency (fracture or a pre-pseu |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/00004623-200210000-00010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72178394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72178394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b070dd1452a1ca3eb643ffc0eac47dda5702d96602c686dec1790e3542f307b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kluLFDEQhYMo7jj6F6QR9K21cut0-ybDeoEFFxn1MaSTajtjprMm3Sz7781cdEGwIAQq3ymKc0JIReE1o9C8gVKiYbxmAKVRqi6HwgOyopLLmvK2eUhWh8e641JekCc57w4iAeoxuaCMK9VRuiK7TZx-4ORnE6rrjIszaR5TzD5XcajmEaut7715W33BvIT52N2iHSdvi-KbSd7MPk658tOR3owmTQHv6u8-BG_2ubpO0aJbEj4ljwYTMj4732vy9f3ldvOxvvr84dPm3VVtuWyhZj0ocI4KyQy1hmPfCD4MFtBYoZwzUgFzXdMAs03bOLRUdYBcCjZwUD1fk1enuTcp_lowz3rvs8UQzIRxyVoxqlreiQK--AfcxSVNZTfNQBYjGe0K1J4gW1zJCQd9k_zepDtNQR_C0H_C0H_D0McwivT5ef7S79HdC8_uF-DlGTC52DkkM1mf7zkBnMlCr4k4cbcxzJjyz7DcYtIjmjCP-n-fgf8G_bWgiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205153219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia: Results of Technical Variations in the Charnley-Williams Procedure</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>Johnston, Charles E</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Charles E</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundResults of the Charnley-Williams method of intramedullary fixation for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia have varied, in part because of variations in surgical technique. The outcomes of three variations of this procedure were compared to determine which technique was the most likely to result in union.MethodsThe results in twenty-three consecutive patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia were reviewed at four to fourteen years following initial surgical treatment with an intramedullary rod. Three types of procedures were performedtype A, which consisted of resection of the tibial pseudarthrosis with shortening, insertion of an intramedullary rod into the tibia, and tibial bone-grafting combined with fibular resection or osteotomy and insertion of an intramedullary rod into the fibula; type B, which was identical to type A except that it did not include fibular fixation; and type C, which consisted of insertion of a tibial rod and bone-grafting but no fibular surgery. The outcome was classified as grade 1 when there was unequivocal union with full weight-bearing function and maintenance of alignment requiring no additional surgical treatment; grade 2 when there was equivocal union with useful function, with the limb protected by a brace, and/or valgus or sagittal bowing for which additional surgery was required or anticipated; and grade 3 when there was persistent nonunion or refracture, requiring full-time external support for pain and/or instability.ResultsEleven patients (48%) ultimately had a grade-1 outcome; nine, a grade-2 outcome; and three, a grade-3 outcome. The final outcome was not associated with either the initial radiographic appearance of the lesion or the age of the patient at the time of the initial surgery. The results following type-A and B operations were better than those after type-C procedures. Surgery on an intact fibula resulted in a lower prevalence of grade-3 outcomes than was found when an intact fibula was not operated on (p = 0.05). Transfixation of the ankle joint by the intramedullary rod did not decrease the prevalence of grade-3 outcomes.ConclusionsThere is little justification for a type-C operation, as it either resulted in a persistent nonunion or failed to improve an equivocal outcome in every case. Leaving an intact fibula undisturbed to maintain stability or length also was not successful in this series. In addition, the presence of fibular insufficiency (fracture or a pre-pseudarthrotic lesion) was highly prognostic for subsequent valgus deformity (occurring in ten of twelve cases), whether or not the fibula eventually healed.</description><edition>American volume</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200210000-00010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12377911</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBJSA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Humans ; Internal Fixators ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Pseudarthrosis - congenital ; Pseudarthrosis - diagnostic imaging ; Pseudarthrosis - surgery ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Tibial Fractures - surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2002-10, Vol.84 (10), p.1799-1810</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b070dd1452a1ca3eb643ffc0eac47dda5702d96602c686dec1790e3542f307b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14032512$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12377911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Charles E</creatorcontrib><title>Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia: Results of Technical Variations in the Charnley-Williams Procedure</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BackgroundResults of the Charnley-Williams method of intramedullary fixation for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia have varied, in part because of variations in surgical technique. The outcomes of three variations of this procedure were compared to determine which technique was the most likely to result in union.MethodsThe results in twenty-three consecutive patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia were reviewed at four to fourteen years following initial surgical treatment with an intramedullary rod. Three types of procedures were performedtype A, which consisted of resection of the tibial pseudarthrosis with shortening, insertion of an intramedullary rod into the tibia, and tibial bone-grafting combined with fibular resection or osteotomy and insertion of an intramedullary rod into the fibula; type B, which was identical to type A except that it did not include fibular fixation; and type C, which consisted of insertion of a tibial rod and bone-grafting but no fibular surgery. The outcome was classified as grade 1 when there was unequivocal union with full weight-bearing function and maintenance of alignment requiring no additional surgical treatment; grade 2 when there was equivocal union with useful function, with the limb protected by a brace, and/or valgus or sagittal bowing for which additional surgery was required or anticipated; and grade 3 when there was persistent nonunion or refracture, requiring full-time external support for pain and/or instability.ResultsEleven patients (48%) ultimately had a grade-1 outcome; nine, a grade-2 outcome; and three, a grade-3 outcome. The final outcome was not associated with either the initial radiographic appearance of the lesion or the age of the patient at the time of the initial surgery. The results following type-A and B operations were better than those after type-C procedures. Surgery on an intact fibula resulted in a lower prevalence of grade-3 outcomes than was found when an intact fibula was not operated on (p = 0.05). Transfixation of the ankle joint by the intramedullary rod did not decrease the prevalence of grade-3 outcomes.ConclusionsThere is little justification for a type-C operation, as it either resulted in a persistent nonunion or failed to improve an equivocal outcome in every case. Leaving an intact fibula undisturbed to maintain stability or length also was not successful in this series. In addition, the presence of fibular insufficiency (fracture or a pre-pseudarthrotic lesion) was highly prognostic for subsequent valgus deformity (occurring in ten of twelve cases), whether or not the fibula eventually healed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Fixators</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Pseudarthrosis - congenital</subject><subject>Pseudarthrosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pseudarthrosis - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kluLFDEQhYMo7jj6F6QR9K21cut0-ybDeoEFFxn1MaSTajtjprMm3Sz7781cdEGwIAQq3ymKc0JIReE1o9C8gVKiYbxmAKVRqi6HwgOyopLLmvK2eUhWh8e641JekCc57w4iAeoxuaCMK9VRuiK7TZx-4ORnE6rrjIszaR5TzD5XcajmEaut7715W33BvIT52N2iHSdvi-KbSd7MPk658tOR3owmTQHv6u8-BG_2ubpO0aJbEj4ljwYTMj4732vy9f3ldvOxvvr84dPm3VVtuWyhZj0ocI4KyQy1hmPfCD4MFtBYoZwzUgFzXdMAs03bOLRUdYBcCjZwUD1fk1enuTcp_lowz3rvs8UQzIRxyVoxqlreiQK--AfcxSVNZTfNQBYjGe0K1J4gW1zJCQd9k_zepDtNQR_C0H_C0H_D0McwivT5ef7S79HdC8_uF-DlGTC52DkkM1mf7zkBnMlCr4k4cbcxzJjyz7DcYtIjmjCP-n-fgf8G_bWgiQ</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Johnston, Charles E</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery AMERICAN VOLUME</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia: Results of Technical Variations in the Charnley-Williams Procedure</title><author>Johnston, Charles E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b070dd1452a1ca3eb643ffc0eac47dda5702d96602c686dec1790e3542f307b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Fixators</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Pseudarthrosis - congenital</topic><topic>Pseudarthrosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pseudarthrosis - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Charles E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, Charles E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia: Results of Technical Variations in the Charnley-Williams Procedure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1799</spage><epage>1810</epage><pages>1799-1810</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><coden>JBJSA3</coden><abstract>BackgroundResults of the Charnley-Williams method of intramedullary fixation for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia have varied, in part because of variations in surgical technique. The outcomes of three variations of this procedure were compared to determine which technique was the most likely to result in union.MethodsThe results in twenty-three consecutive patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia were reviewed at four to fourteen years following initial surgical treatment with an intramedullary rod. Three types of procedures were performedtype A, which consisted of resection of the tibial pseudarthrosis with shortening, insertion of an intramedullary rod into the tibia, and tibial bone-grafting combined with fibular resection or osteotomy and insertion of an intramedullary rod into the fibula; type B, which was identical to type A except that it did not include fibular fixation; and type C, which consisted of insertion of a tibial rod and bone-grafting but no fibular surgery. The outcome was classified as grade 1 when there was unequivocal union with full weight-bearing function and maintenance of alignment requiring no additional surgical treatment; grade 2 when there was equivocal union with useful function, with the limb protected by a brace, and/or valgus or sagittal bowing for which additional surgery was required or anticipated; and grade 3 when there was persistent nonunion or refracture, requiring full-time external support for pain and/or instability.ResultsEleven patients (48%) ultimately had a grade-1 outcome; nine, a grade-2 outcome; and three, a grade-3 outcome. The final outcome was not associated with either the initial radiographic appearance of the lesion or the age of the patient at the time of the initial surgery. The results following type-A and B operations were better than those after type-C procedures. Surgery on an intact fibula resulted in a lower prevalence of grade-3 outcomes than was found when an intact fibula was not operated on (p = 0.05). Transfixation of the ankle joint by the intramedullary rod did not decrease the prevalence of grade-3 outcomes.ConclusionsThere is little justification for a type-C operation, as it either resulted in a persistent nonunion or failed to improve an equivocal outcome in every case. Leaving an intact fibula undisturbed to maintain stability or length also was not successful in this series. In addition, the presence of fibular insufficiency (fracture or a pre-pseudarthrotic lesion) was highly prognostic for subsequent valgus deformity (occurring in ten of twelve cases), whether or not the fibula eventually healed.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>12377911</pmid><doi>10.2106/00004623-200210000-00010</doi><tpages>12</tpages><edition>American volume</edition></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2002-10, Vol.84 (10), p.1799-1810 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72178394 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Adolescent Biological and medical sciences Bone Transplantation - methods Child Child, Preschool Combined Modality Therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods Humans Internal Fixators Male Medical sciences Orthopedic surgery Pseudarthrosis - congenital Pseudarthrosis - diagnostic imaging Pseudarthrosis - surgery Radiography Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging Tibial Fractures - surgery Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia: Results of Technical Variations in the Charnley-Williams Procedure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T05%3A41%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Congenital%20Pseudarthrosis%20of%20the%20Tibia:%20Results%20of%20Technical%20Variations%20in%20the%20Charnley-Williams%20Procedure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Johnston,%20Charles%20E&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1799&rft.epage=1810&rft.pages=1799-1810&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft.coden=JBJSA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/00004623-200210000-00010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72178394%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b070dd1452a1ca3eb643ffc0eac47dda5702d96602c686dec1790e3542f307b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205153219&rft_id=info:pmid/12377911&rfr_iscdi=true |