Loading…
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis––a double blind randomised controlled trial
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an increasingly popular therapeutic approach to the treatment of a number of soft tissue complaints. Whilst benefit has been demonstrated in calcific tendinitis, evidence is lacking for benefit in the management of non-calcific rotator cuff disorders. Aims...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of orthopaedic research 2002-09, Vol.20 (5), p.895-898 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5962-c3456c4d9240731e7f5a5388b2591c29734095288101c3660127aa870bcbfe9e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5962-c3456c4d9240731e7f5a5388b2591c29734095288101c3660127aa870bcbfe9e3 |
container_end_page | 898 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 895 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic research |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Speed, C.A Nichols, D Richards, C Humphreys, H Wies, J.T Burnet, S Hazleman, B.L |
description | Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an increasingly popular therapeutic approach to the treatment of a number of soft tissue complaints. Whilst benefit has been demonstrated in calcific tendinitis, evidence is lacking for benefit in the management of non-calcific rotator cuff disorders.
Aims: To perform a double-blind placebo controlled trial of moderate dose ESWT in chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Methods: Adults with lateral epicondylitis were randomised to receive either active treatment (1500 pulses ESWT at 0.12 mJ/mm
2) or sham therapy, monthly for three months. All were assessed before each treatment and one month after completion of therapy. Outcome measures consisted of visual analogue scores for pain in the day and at night.
Results: Seventy-five subjects participated and there were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. The mean duration of symptoms was 15.9 and 12 months in the ESWT and sham groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant improvements from two months. No significant difference existed between the groups with respect to the degrees of change in pain scores over the study period. In the ESWT group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 73.4 (14.5, 38–99) at baseline and 47.9 (31.4, 3–100) at three months. In the sham group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 67.2 (21.7, 12–100) at baseline and 51.5 (32.5, 3–100) at three months.
At three months, 50% improvement from baseline was noted in 35% of the ESWT group and 34% of the sham group with respect to pain.
Conclusions: There appears to be a significant placebo effect of moderate dose ESWT in subjects with lateral epicondylitis but there is no evidence of added benefit of treatment when compared to sham therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72184897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S073602660200013X</els_id><sourcerecordid>208492001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5962-c3456c4d9240731e7f5a5388b2591c29734095288101c3660127aa870bcbfe9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EosPAI4AsFggWAV_i2FkVVJUBVLVSuXR2luOcUd3xxMFO2s6Od-ANeRLcZlQkNiBZvkifP53zH4SeUvKaElq9-UwkrwrCquolYa8IIZQXy3toRoUoC8Hk8j6a3SF76FFKFxmSlKmHaI8yrlgtyAytD6-HaGyIfYhgPE7nwa7xlbkEPJxDNP0Wr0LE3gz54TH0zoau3Xo3uPTrx8-8DG7D2HjAjXddi6Pp2rBxCVqcySEG7_N1iM74x-jByvgET3bnHH19f_jl4ENxdLL4ePDuqLCirlhheSkqW7Y1K3MDFORKGMGVapioqWW15CWpBVMq52B5VRHKpDFKksY2K6iBz9GLydvH8H2ENOhcjwXvTQdhTFoyqkqVPXP0_C_wIoyxy7VpxgUlQtU0Q2KCbAwpRVjpPrqNiVtNib4Zhb4dhb7JOW_6dhR6mf8928nHZgPtn1-77DPwdgKunIft_1n1p5NTSglhhAjCsqKYFC4NcH2nMHGtK8ml0GfHC30szk4X5JvUPPP7Ew85_ksHUSfroLPQugh20G1w_-jqN-nWu_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235105891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis––a double blind randomised controlled trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Speed, C.A ; Nichols, D ; Richards, C ; Humphreys, H ; Wies, J.T ; Burnet, S ; Hazleman, B.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Speed, C.A ; Nichols, D ; Richards, C ; Humphreys, H ; Wies, J.T ; Burnet, S ; Hazleman, B.L</creatorcontrib><description>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an increasingly popular therapeutic approach to the treatment of a number of soft tissue complaints. Whilst benefit has been demonstrated in calcific tendinitis, evidence is lacking for benefit in the management of non-calcific rotator cuff disorders.
Aims: To perform a double-blind placebo controlled trial of moderate dose ESWT in chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Methods: Adults with lateral epicondylitis were randomised to receive either active treatment (1500 pulses ESWT at 0.12 mJ/mm
2) or sham therapy, monthly for three months. All were assessed before each treatment and one month after completion of therapy. Outcome measures consisted of visual analogue scores for pain in the day and at night.
Results: Seventy-five subjects participated and there were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. The mean duration of symptoms was 15.9 and 12 months in the ESWT and sham groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant improvements from two months. No significant difference existed between the groups with respect to the degrees of change in pain scores over the study period. In the ESWT group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 73.4 (14.5, 38–99) at baseline and 47.9 (31.4, 3–100) at three months. In the sham group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 67.2 (21.7, 12–100) at baseline and 51.5 (32.5, 3–100) at three months.
At three months, 50% improvement from baseline was noted in 35% of the ESWT group and 34% of the sham group with respect to pain.
Conclusions: There appears to be a significant placebo effect of moderate dose ESWT in subjects with lateral epicondylitis but there is no evidence of added benefit of treatment when compared to sham therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12382950</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOREDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Double-Blind Method ; Elbow ; Female ; High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lateral epicondylitis ; Lithotripsy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain Management ; Pain Measurement ; Shock wave ; Tennis ; Tennis Elbow - physiopathology ; Tennis Elbow - therapy ; Treatment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2002-09, Vol.20 (5), p.895-898</ispartof><rights>2002 Orthopaedic Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Sep 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5962-c3456c4d9240731e7f5a5388b2591c29734095288101c3660127aa870bcbfe9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5962-c3456c4d9240731e7f5a5388b2591c29734095288101c3660127aa870bcbfe9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073602660200013X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45779</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12382950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Speed, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wies, J.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnet, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazleman, B.L</creatorcontrib><title>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis––a double blind randomised controlled trial</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><description>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an increasingly popular therapeutic approach to the treatment of a number of soft tissue complaints. Whilst benefit has been demonstrated in calcific tendinitis, evidence is lacking for benefit in the management of non-calcific rotator cuff disorders.
Aims: To perform a double-blind placebo controlled trial of moderate dose ESWT in chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Methods: Adults with lateral epicondylitis were randomised to receive either active treatment (1500 pulses ESWT at 0.12 mJ/mm
2) or sham therapy, monthly for three months. All were assessed before each treatment and one month after completion of therapy. Outcome measures consisted of visual analogue scores for pain in the day and at night.
Results: Seventy-five subjects participated and there were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. The mean duration of symptoms was 15.9 and 12 months in the ESWT and sham groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant improvements from two months. No significant difference existed between the groups with respect to the degrees of change in pain scores over the study period. In the ESWT group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 73.4 (14.5, 38–99) at baseline and 47.9 (31.4, 3–100) at three months. In the sham group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 67.2 (21.7, 12–100) at baseline and 51.5 (32.5, 3–100) at three months.
At three months, 50% improvement from baseline was noted in 35% of the ESWT group and 34% of the sham group with respect to pain.
Conclusions: There appears to be a significant placebo effect of moderate dose ESWT in subjects with lateral epicondylitis but there is no evidence of added benefit of treatment when compared to sham therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lateral epicondylitis</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Shock wave</subject><subject>Tennis</subject><subject>Tennis Elbow - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tennis Elbow - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EosPAI4AsFggWAV_i2FkVVJUBVLVSuXR2luOcUd3xxMFO2s6Od-ANeRLcZlQkNiBZvkifP53zH4SeUvKaElq9-UwkrwrCquolYa8IIZQXy3toRoUoC8Hk8j6a3SF76FFKFxmSlKmHaI8yrlgtyAytD6-HaGyIfYhgPE7nwa7xlbkEPJxDNP0Wr0LE3gz54TH0zoau3Xo3uPTrx8-8DG7D2HjAjXddi6Pp2rBxCVqcySEG7_N1iM74x-jByvgET3bnHH19f_jl4ENxdLL4ePDuqLCirlhheSkqW7Y1K3MDFORKGMGVapioqWW15CWpBVMq52B5VRHKpDFKksY2K6iBz9GLydvH8H2ENOhcjwXvTQdhTFoyqkqVPXP0_C_wIoyxy7VpxgUlQtU0Q2KCbAwpRVjpPrqNiVtNib4Zhb4dhb7JOW_6dhR6mf8928nHZgPtn1-77DPwdgKunIft_1n1p5NTSglhhAjCsqKYFC4NcH2nMHGtK8ml0GfHC30szk4X5JvUPPP7Ew85_ksHUSfroLPQugh20G1w_-jqN-nWu_M</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Speed, C.A</creator><creator>Nichols, D</creator><creator>Richards, C</creator><creator>Humphreys, H</creator><creator>Wies, J.T</creator><creator>Burnet, S</creator><creator>Hazleman, B.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis––a double blind randomised controlled trial</title><author>Speed, C.A ; Nichols, D ; Richards, C ; Humphreys, H ; Wies, J.T ; Burnet, S ; Hazleman, B.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5962-c3456c4d9240731e7f5a5388b2591c29734095288101c3660127aa870bcbfe9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lateral epicondylitis</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Shock wave</topic><topic>Tennis</topic><topic>Tennis Elbow - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tennis Elbow - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Speed, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wies, J.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnet, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazleman, B.L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Speed, C.A</au><au>Nichols, D</au><au>Richards, C</au><au>Humphreys, H</au><au>Wies, J.T</au><au>Burnet, S</au><au>Hazleman, B.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis––a double blind randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>898</epage><pages>895-898</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><coden>JOREDR</coden><abstract>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an increasingly popular therapeutic approach to the treatment of a number of soft tissue complaints. Whilst benefit has been demonstrated in calcific tendinitis, evidence is lacking for benefit in the management of non-calcific rotator cuff disorders.
Aims: To perform a double-blind placebo controlled trial of moderate dose ESWT in chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Methods: Adults with lateral epicondylitis were randomised to receive either active treatment (1500 pulses ESWT at 0.12 mJ/mm
2) or sham therapy, monthly for three months. All were assessed before each treatment and one month after completion of therapy. Outcome measures consisted of visual analogue scores for pain in the day and at night.
Results: Seventy-five subjects participated and there were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. The mean duration of symptoms was 15.9 and 12 months in the ESWT and sham groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant improvements from two months. No significant difference existed between the groups with respect to the degrees of change in pain scores over the study period. In the ESWT group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 73.4 (14.5, 38–99) at baseline and 47.9 (31.4, 3–100) at three months. In the sham group the mean (SD, range) pain score was 67.2 (21.7, 12–100) at baseline and 51.5 (32.5, 3–100) at three months.
At three months, 50% improvement from baseline was noted in 35% of the ESWT group and 34% of the sham group with respect to pain.
Conclusions: There appears to be a significant placebo effect of moderate dose ESWT in subjects with lateral epicondylitis but there is no evidence of added benefit of treatment when compared to sham therapy.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12382950</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-0266 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic research, 2002-09, Vol.20 (5), p.895-898 |
issn | 0736-0266 1554-527X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72184897 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Double-Blind Method Elbow Female High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use Humans Lateral epicondylitis Lithotripsy - methods Male Middle Aged Pain - physiopathology Pain Management Pain Measurement Shock wave Tennis Tennis Elbow - physiopathology Tennis Elbow - therapy Treatment Treatment Outcome |
title | Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis––a double blind randomised controlled trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A02%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extracorporeal%20shock%20wave%20therapy%20for%20lateral%20epicondylitis%E2%80%93%E2%80%93a%20double%20blind%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Speed,%20C.A&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=898&rft.pages=895-898&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft.coden=JOREDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E208492001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5962-c3456c4d9240731e7f5a5388b2591c29734095288101c3660127aa870bcbfe9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235105891&rft_id=info:pmid/12382950&rfr_iscdi=true |