Loading…

COMPARISONS OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPISTS, PSYCHOLOGISTS, PSYCHIATRISTS, AND SOCIAL WORKERS ON JOB-RELATED MEASURES AND REACTIONS TO MANAGED CARE IN IOWA

This study compares marriage and family therapists (MFTs) to psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers on job‐related measures, such as job autonomy, job satisfaction, burnout, and intention to stay in their present position, as well as on reactions to a managed care initiative in the state o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marital and family therapy 2001-10, Vol.27 (4), p.501-507
Main Authors: Trudeau, Linda S., Russell, Daniel W., de la Mora, Arlene, Schmitz, Mark F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study compares marriage and family therapists (MFTs) to psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers on job‐related measures, such as job autonomy, job satisfaction, burnout, and intention to stay in their present position, as well as on reactions to a managed care initiative in the state of Iowa. Findings indicate that MFTs scored significantly lower than other practitioners on job autonomy and intention to stay in their present position, but there were no differences in job satisfaction or burnout. Marital and family therapists also reported less dissatisfaction with the managed care initiative than psychiatrists, although virtually all practitioners were dissatisfied with the managed‐care program. These findings indicate some dissatisfaction within the MFT profession and may be relevant to practitioners seeking to change or expand their practice, as well as to the needs of MFTs in their training programs.
ISSN:0194-472X
1752-0606
DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb00343.x