Loading…
Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization
Some authors divide rectoceles into those with chronic evacuatory difficulty and normal genital position (type 1) and those with associated pelvic organ prolapse (type 2). This study assessed whether there are physiological differences between these two clinical rectocele types. Female patients were...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of colorectal disease 2001-09, Vol.16 (5), p.307-312 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-77414793a4fe662e3284e940531309b35a002e37e12e41aa2510628c1ae5129f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 312 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | International journal of colorectal disease |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | ZBAR, A. P BEER-GABEL, M ASLAM, M |
description | Some authors divide rectoceles into those with chronic evacuatory difficulty and normal genital position (type 1) and those with associated pelvic organ prolapse (type 2). This study assessed whether there are physiological differences between these two clinical rectocele types. Female patients were assessed by conventional anorectal manometry, vector manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), and defecography. Subjects included 33 volunteer controls without anorectal disease, 14 patients with type I rectocele, and 26 patients with type II rectocele. Significant differences were noted for resting pressure measurements (maximal resting anal pressure and vector volume) between rectocele types and between type I patients and controls. Significant differences were noted for squeeze parameters (maximal squeeze pressure and vector volume) only between rectocele types. There were minimal differences in parameters of the RAIR, with a reduced slope of inhibition in the proximal sphincter for both rectocele groups and a reduced maximal inhibitory pressure in the intermediate and distal sphincter of type 1 rectocele patients. There were no differences in transient excitation of the pressure wave during the RAIR reflex to account for pressure variations with no measured differences in rectocele depth (type 1, 2.87 +/- 0.7 cm; type 2, 2.84 +/- 1.4 cm) There are few physiological differences between the different clinical categories of rectocele patients based on the presence or absence of associated genital prolapse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s003840100315 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72245537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72245537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-77414793a4fe662e3284e940531309b35a002e37e12e41aa2510628c1ae5129f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0N9LwzAQB_AgipvTR1-lIPpWzeVn65vMnzAQRJ9L1l23jK6ZSSvMv96MFYY-5ZJ8OO6-hJwDvQFK9W2glGeCxpqDPCBDEJylwBQ7JEMKOk8hl9mAnISwpPGutDgmAwCVKcnyIXl4x7J1pjF1YpuFndrWuiYxzSzx248Sa7xL1otNsK52803yjT50ISlNi3Pn7Y_Z-lNyVJk64Fl_jsjn0-PH-CWdvD2_ju8nacmFblOtBQidcyMqVIohZ5nAXFDJgdN8yqWhNL5qBIYCjGESqGJZCQYlsLziI3K967v27qvD0BYrG-KItWnQdaHQjAkpuY7w8h9cus7HJUMBWgoFkHERVbpTpXcheKyKtbcr4zcF0GIbbvEn3Ogv-q7ddIWzve7TjOCqByaUpq68aUob9k7QOKHK-C-87n72</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1754611834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization</title><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>ZBAR, A. P ; BEER-GABEL, M ; ASLAM, M</creator><creatorcontrib>ZBAR, A. P ; BEER-GABEL, M ; ASLAM, M</creatorcontrib><description>Some authors divide rectoceles into those with chronic evacuatory difficulty and normal genital position (type 1) and those with associated pelvic organ prolapse (type 2). This study assessed whether there are physiological differences between these two clinical rectocele types. Female patients were assessed by conventional anorectal manometry, vector manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), and defecography. Subjects included 33 volunteer controls without anorectal disease, 14 patients with type I rectocele, and 26 patients with type II rectocele. Significant differences were noted for resting pressure measurements (maximal resting anal pressure and vector volume) between rectocele types and between type I patients and controls. Significant differences were noted for squeeze parameters (maximal squeeze pressure and vector volume) only between rectocele types. There were minimal differences in parameters of the RAIR, with a reduced slope of inhibition in the proximal sphincter for both rectocele groups and a reduced maximal inhibitory pressure in the intermediate and distal sphincter of type 1 rectocele patients. There were no differences in transient excitation of the pressure wave during the RAIR reflex to account for pressure variations with no measured differences in rectocele depth (type 1, 2.87 +/- 0.7 cm; type 2, 2.84 +/- 1.4 cm) There are few physiological differences between the different clinical categories of rectocele patients based on the presence or absence of associated genital prolapse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s003840100315</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11686529</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCDE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anal Canal - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Defecation ; Digestive system ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Manometry ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Physiology ; Rectocele - classification ; Rectocele - physiopathology ; Rectum - physiopathology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Vagina - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>International journal of colorectal disease, 2001-09, Vol.16 (5), p.307-312</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-77414793a4fe662e3284e940531309b35a002e37e12e41aa2510628c1ae5129f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14072268$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686529$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZBAR, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEER-GABEL, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASLAM, M</creatorcontrib><title>Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization</title><title>International journal of colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Some authors divide rectoceles into those with chronic evacuatory difficulty and normal genital position (type 1) and those with associated pelvic organ prolapse (type 2). This study assessed whether there are physiological differences between these two clinical rectocele types. Female patients were assessed by conventional anorectal manometry, vector manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), and defecography. Subjects included 33 volunteer controls without anorectal disease, 14 patients with type I rectocele, and 26 patients with type II rectocele. Significant differences were noted for resting pressure measurements (maximal resting anal pressure and vector volume) between rectocele types and between type I patients and controls. Significant differences were noted for squeeze parameters (maximal squeeze pressure and vector volume) only between rectocele types. There were minimal differences in parameters of the RAIR, with a reduced slope of inhibition in the proximal sphincter for both rectocele groups and a reduced maximal inhibitory pressure in the intermediate and distal sphincter of type 1 rectocele patients. There were no differences in transient excitation of the pressure wave during the RAIR reflex to account for pressure variations with no measured differences in rectocele depth (type 1, 2.87 +/- 0.7 cm; type 2, 2.84 +/- 1.4 cm) There are few physiological differences between the different clinical categories of rectocele patients based on the presence or absence of associated genital prolapse.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anal Canal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Defecation</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Manometry</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Rectocele - classification</subject><subject>Rectocele - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rectum - physiopathology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Vagina - physiopathology</subject><issn>0179-1958</issn><issn>1432-1262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0N9LwzAQB_AgipvTR1-lIPpWzeVn65vMnzAQRJ9L1l23jK6ZSSvMv96MFYY-5ZJ8OO6-hJwDvQFK9W2glGeCxpqDPCBDEJylwBQ7JEMKOk8hl9mAnISwpPGutDgmAwCVKcnyIXl4x7J1pjF1YpuFndrWuiYxzSzx248Sa7xL1otNsK52803yjT50ISlNi3Pn7Y_Z-lNyVJk64Fl_jsjn0-PH-CWdvD2_ju8nacmFblOtBQidcyMqVIohZ5nAXFDJgdN8yqWhNL5qBIYCjGESqGJZCQYlsLziI3K967v27qvD0BYrG-KItWnQdaHQjAkpuY7w8h9cus7HJUMBWgoFkHERVbpTpXcheKyKtbcr4zcF0GIbbvEn3Ogv-q7ddIWzve7TjOCqByaUpq68aUob9k7QOKHK-C-87n72</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>ZBAR, A. P</creator><creator>BEER-GABEL, M</creator><creator>ASLAM, M</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization</title><author>ZBAR, A. P ; BEER-GABEL, M ; ASLAM, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-77414793a4fe662e3284e940531309b35a002e37e12e41aa2510628c1ae5129f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anal Canal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Defecation</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Manometry</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Rectocele - classification</topic><topic>Rectocele - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rectum - physiopathology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Vagina - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZBAR, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEER-GABEL, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASLAM, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZBAR, A. P</au><au>BEER-GABEL, M</au><au>ASLAM, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization</atitle><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>307-312</pages><issn>0179-1958</issn><eissn>1432-1262</eissn><coden>IJCDE6</coden><abstract>Some authors divide rectoceles into those with chronic evacuatory difficulty and normal genital position (type 1) and those with associated pelvic organ prolapse (type 2). This study assessed whether there are physiological differences between these two clinical rectocele types. Female patients were assessed by conventional anorectal manometry, vector manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), and defecography. Subjects included 33 volunteer controls without anorectal disease, 14 patients with type I rectocele, and 26 patients with type II rectocele. Significant differences were noted for resting pressure measurements (maximal resting anal pressure and vector volume) between rectocele types and between type I patients and controls. Significant differences were noted for squeeze parameters (maximal squeeze pressure and vector volume) only between rectocele types. There were minimal differences in parameters of the RAIR, with a reduced slope of inhibition in the proximal sphincter for both rectocele groups and a reduced maximal inhibitory pressure in the intermediate and distal sphincter of type 1 rectocele patients. There were no differences in transient excitation of the pressure wave during the RAIR reflex to account for pressure variations with no measured differences in rectocele depth (type 1, 2.87 +/- 0.7 cm; type 2, 2.84 +/- 1.4 cm) There are few physiological differences between the different clinical categories of rectocele patients based on the presence or absence of associated genital prolapse.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11686529</pmid><doi>10.1007/s003840100315</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0179-1958 |
ispartof | International journal of colorectal disease, 2001-09, Vol.16 (5), p.307-312 |
issn | 0179-1958 1432-1262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72245537 |
source | Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anal Canal - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Defecation Digestive system Female Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Manometry Medical sciences Middle Aged Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Physiology Rectocele - classification Rectocele - physiopathology Rectum - physiopathology Severity of Illness Index Vagina - physiopathology |
title | Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A05%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rectoanal%20inhibition%20and%20rectocele:%20physiology%20versus%20categorization&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20colorectal%20disease&rft.au=ZBAR,%20A.%20P&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=307-312&rft.issn=0179-1958&rft.eissn=1432-1262&rft.coden=IJCDE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s003840100315&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72245537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-77414793a4fe662e3284e940531309b35a002e37e12e41aa2510628c1ae5129f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1754611834&rft_id=info:pmid/11686529&rfr_iscdi=true |