Loading…

Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?

Objective To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely. Design Cross sectional study. Setting One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1088-1093
Main Authors: Macmillan, Susan, McKenzie, Hamish, Flett, Gillian, Templeton, Allan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23
container_end_page 1093
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1088
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 107
creator Macmillan, Susan
McKenzie, Hamish
Flett, Gillian
Templeton, Allan
description Objective To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely. Design Cross sectional study. Setting One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre. Population Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings. Main outcome measures Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age. Results Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years. Conclusions The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72285722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764119207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1KxDAURoMoOo6-ghQRXbXepEmauhl08JeB2SguQ5omtEM71aZF5-1NnaI7wSySkJx778dB6BRDhP26XEWYJjgERkREACDqMv8MLPrcQZOfr93vO4QQE3GADp1bAWBOIN5HB54GkjKYoOS1KHURfDS1WQeuaPoqDzITdMZ1Jg9s0wbzolL1Ji9V0LVKF02tutLNjtCeVZUzx-M5RS93t8_zh3CxvH-cXy9CTf3cMNPaxlzFAjOTAyeZZUB9OiOEtYRZUCwBhgmhlOucUcpsZgE4z1KRKEviKbrY9n1rm_fep5J16bSpKrU2Te9kwinGKYHEk-d_k4QI5jcPXm1B3TbOtcbKt7asVbuRGOQgWK7kYFEOFuUgWI6C5acvPhmn9Flt8t_S0agHzkZAOa0q26q1Lt0vR3ma8iHtbIt9lJXZ_COBvHlaYhAi_gJIAZV1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72285722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Macmillan, Susan ; McKenzie, Hamish ; Flett, Gillian ; Templeton, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Susan ; McKenzie, Hamish ; Flett, Gillian ; Templeton, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely. Design Cross sectional study. Setting One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre. Population Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings. Main outcome measures Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age. Results Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years. Conclusions The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-215X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11002950</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOGAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Ambulatory Care ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the genital system ; Bacterial diseases of the urinary system ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis ; Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology ; Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision Making ; Female ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Scotland - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1088-1093</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1469967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11002950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flett, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templeton, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely. Design Cross sectional study. Setting One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre. Population Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings. Main outcome measures Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age. Results Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years. Conclusions The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the urinary system</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>0306-5456</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><issn>1365-215X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkM1KxDAURoMoOo6-ghQRXbXepEmauhl08JeB2SguQ5omtEM71aZF5-1NnaI7wSySkJx778dB6BRDhP26XEWYJjgERkREACDqMv8MLPrcQZOfr93vO4QQE3GADp1bAWBOIN5HB54GkjKYoOS1KHURfDS1WQeuaPoqDzITdMZ1Jg9s0wbzolL1Ji9V0LVKF02tutLNjtCeVZUzx-M5RS93t8_zh3CxvH-cXy9CTf3cMNPaxlzFAjOTAyeZZUB9OiOEtYRZUCwBhgmhlOucUcpsZgE4z1KRKEviKbrY9n1rm_fep5J16bSpKrU2Te9kwinGKYHEk-d_k4QI5jcPXm1B3TbOtcbKt7asVbuRGOQgWK7kYFEOFuUgWI6C5acvPhmn9Flt8t_S0agHzkZAOa0q26q1Lt0vR3ma8iHtbIt9lJXZ_COBvHlaYhAi_gJIAZV1</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>Macmillan, Susan</creator><creator>McKenzie, Hamish</creator><creator>Flett, Gillian</creator><creator>Templeton, Allan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</title><author>Macmillan, Susan ; McKenzie, Hamish ; Flett, Gillian ; Templeton, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the urinary system</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flett, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templeton, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macmillan, Susan</au><au>McKenzie, Hamish</au><au>Flett, Gillian</au><au>Templeton, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1088</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1088-1093</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>0306-5456</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><eissn>1365-215X</eissn><coden>BJOGAS</coden><abstract>Objective To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely. Design Cross sectional study. Setting One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre. Population Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings. Main outcome measures Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age. Results Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years. Conclusions The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11002950</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1088-1093
issn 1470-0328
0306-5456
1471-0528
1365-215X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72285722
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Ambulatory Care
Bacterial diseases
Bacterial diseases of the genital system
Bacterial diseases of the urinary system
Biological and medical sciences
Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis
Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology
Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Female
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology
Prevalence
Scotland - epidemiology
title Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-10T01%3A00%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20women%20should%20be%20tested%20for%20Chlamydia%20trachomatis?&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Macmillan,%20Susan&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1088&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1088-1093&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BJOGAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764119207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72285722&rft_id=info:pmid/11002950&rfr_iscdi=true