Loading…
Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?
Objective To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely. Design Cross sectional study. Setting One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urba...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1088-1093 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23 |
container_end_page | 1093 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1088 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Macmillan, Susan McKenzie, Hamish Flett, Gillian Templeton, Allan |
description | Objective
To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely.
Design
Cross sectional study.
Setting
One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre.
Population
Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings.
Main outcome measures
Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age.
Results
Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years.
Conclusions
The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72285722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764119207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1KxDAURoMoOo6-ghQRXbXepEmauhl08JeB2SguQ5omtEM71aZF5-1NnaI7wSySkJx778dB6BRDhP26XEWYJjgERkREACDqMv8MLPrcQZOfr93vO4QQE3GADp1bAWBOIN5HB54GkjKYoOS1KHURfDS1WQeuaPoqDzITdMZ1Jg9s0wbzolL1Ji9V0LVKF02tutLNjtCeVZUzx-M5RS93t8_zh3CxvH-cXy9CTf3cMNPaxlzFAjOTAyeZZUB9OiOEtYRZUCwBhgmhlOucUcpsZgE4z1KRKEviKbrY9n1rm_fep5J16bSpKrU2Te9kwinGKYHEk-d_k4QI5jcPXm1B3TbOtcbKt7asVbuRGOQgWK7kYFEOFuUgWI6C5acvPhmn9Flt8t_S0agHzkZAOa0q26q1Lt0vR3ma8iHtbIt9lJXZ_COBvHlaYhAi_gJIAZV1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72285722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Macmillan, Susan ; McKenzie, Hamish ; Flett, Gillian ; Templeton, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Susan ; McKenzie, Hamish ; Flett, Gillian ; Templeton, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely.
Design
Cross sectional study.
Setting
One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre.
Population
Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings.
Main outcome measures
Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age.
Results
Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years.
Conclusions
The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-215X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11002950</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOGAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Ambulatory Care ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the genital system ; Bacterial diseases of the urinary system ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis ; Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology ; Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision Making ; Female ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Scotland - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1088-1093</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1469967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11002950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flett, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templeton, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective
To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely.
Design
Cross sectional study.
Setting
One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre.
Population
Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings.
Main outcome measures
Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age.
Results
Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years.
Conclusions
The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the urinary system</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>0306-5456</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><issn>1365-215X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkM1KxDAURoMoOo6-ghQRXbXepEmauhl08JeB2SguQ5omtEM71aZF5-1NnaI7wSySkJx778dB6BRDhP26XEWYJjgERkREACDqMv8MLPrcQZOfr93vO4QQE3GADp1bAWBOIN5HB54GkjKYoOS1KHURfDS1WQeuaPoqDzITdMZ1Jg9s0wbzolL1Ji9V0LVKF02tutLNjtCeVZUzx-M5RS93t8_zh3CxvH-cXy9CTf3cMNPaxlzFAjOTAyeZZUB9OiOEtYRZUCwBhgmhlOucUcpsZgE4z1KRKEviKbrY9n1rm_fep5J16bSpKrU2Te9kwinGKYHEk-d_k4QI5jcPXm1B3TbOtcbKt7asVbuRGOQgWK7kYFEOFuUgWI6C5acvPhmn9Flt8t_S0agHzkZAOa0q26q1Lt0vR3ma8iHtbIt9lJXZ_COBvHlaYhAi_gJIAZV1</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>Macmillan, Susan</creator><creator>McKenzie, Hamish</creator><creator>Flett, Gillian</creator><creator>Templeton, Allan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</title><author>Macmillan, Susan ; McKenzie, Hamish ; Flett, Gillian ; Templeton, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the urinary system</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macmillan, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flett, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templeton, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macmillan, Susan</au><au>McKenzie, Hamish</au><au>Flett, Gillian</au><au>Templeton, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1088</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1088-1093</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>0306-5456</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><eissn>1365-215X</eissn><coden>BJOGAS</coden><abstract>Objective
To assess the prevalence of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women in different clinical settings, with a view to making decisions about who should be tested routinely.
Design
Cross sectional study.
Setting
One regional hospital and family planning clinic serving an urban centre.
Population
Two thousand thirty‐five sexually active women attending various outpatient settings.
Main outcome measures
Prevalence of positivity by clinical setting, stratified by age.
Results
Overall, prevalence of lower genital tract chlamydial infection was similar in a variety of clinical settings. Infertile women were the only exception, demonstrating a much lower prevalence. Stratifying the study population by age found a clear trend towards high prevalence in teenagers and virtually no infection in women over the age of 30 years.
Conclusions
The prevalence of chlamydial infection in women is related to age, regardless of clinical presentation. In practice, opportunistic screening should target sexually active women under 30 years of age.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11002950</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2000-09, Vol.107 (9), p.1088-1093 |
issn | 1470-0328 0306-5456 1471-0528 1365-215X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72285722 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Ambulatory Care Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the genital system Bacterial diseases of the urinary system Biological and medical sciences Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification Cross-Sectional Studies Decision Making Female Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Mass Screening - methods Medical sciences Middle Aged Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology Prevalence Scotland - epidemiology |
title | Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-10T01%3A00%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20women%20should%20be%20tested%20for%20Chlamydia%20trachomatis?&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Macmillan,%20Susan&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1088&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1088-1093&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BJOGAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11105.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764119207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4328-bccf36a3815ed062bf504052e88ff25f0a5705122446cd5445fbf0066b987af23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72285722&rft_id=info:pmid/11002950&rfr_iscdi=true |