Loading…
Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology
Evaluation of thin‐layer methods in urine cytology Conventional cytospin smears prepared from urinary tract specimens were compared with two new thin layer techniques, i.e. ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™. Cellularity, cell preservation, background features, detection rate, screening time and ease of p...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Cytopathology (Oxford) 2001-10, Vol.12 (5), p.306-313 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4681-c9ec0829f9c0ed9e6c6efa493293f04a7be78d902571b6b2c21f65ee4be233aa3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4681-c9ec0829f9c0ed9e6c6efa493293f04a7be78d902571b6b2c21f65ee4be233aa3 |
| container_end_page | 313 |
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 306 |
| container_title | Cytopathology (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Wright, R. G. Halford, J. A. |
| description | Evaluation of thin‐layer methods in urine cytology
Conventional cytospin smears prepared from urinary tract specimens were compared with two new thin layer techniques, i.e. ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™. Cellularity, cell preservation, background features, detection rate, screening time and ease of preparation were evaluated. Thin‐layer techniques when applied to urine cytology were found to improve cell yield and cell preservation, and reduce background artefact. The reporting rate for abnormal urothelial cells was comparable to conventional cytospin smears, as was screening time. Laboratory staff found the methodologies to be practicable and easily incorporated into a large routine diagnostic service. We conclude that a one‐slide thin‐layer urine preparation is comparable to four cytospin slides in the detection of urothelial abnormalities, and that both ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™ have comparable features. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00341.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72304672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72304672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4681-c9ec0829f9c0ed9e6c6efa493293f04a7be78d902571b6b2c21f65ee4be233aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCygrdgl-xYklNqiUQlXBpgjBxnKcCU3JA-IEmr8nIVXZsrEt-Z47moOQQ7BHMBeXG48w4buUYeZRjImHMePE2x6g8f7jEI2x9IXr-zgYoRNrN12QSsqO0YiQgFKf4DGisy-dNbpOy8IpE6dep4Wb6RYqJ4d6XcbWSQunqdICHNPWZVa-tafoKNGZhbPdPUFPt7PV9M5dPs7vp9dL13AREtdIMDikMpEGQyxBGAGJ5pJRyRLMdRBBEMYSUz8gkYiooSQRPgCPgDKmNZugi6H3oyo_G7C1ylNrIMt0AWVjVdBtyUV3TlA4BE1VWltBoj6qNNdVqwhWvS-1Ub0W1WtRvS_160ttO_R8N6OJcoj_wJ2gLnA1BL7TDNp_F6vpy6p7dLg74KmtYbvHdfWuRMACXz0_zNVisbiRnE_VK_sBm7aHUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72304672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Wright, R. G. ; Halford, J. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, R. G. ; Halford, J. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluation of thin‐layer methods in urine cytology
Conventional cytospin smears prepared from urinary tract specimens were compared with two new thin layer techniques, i.e. ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™. Cellularity, cell preservation, background features, detection rate, screening time and ease of preparation were evaluated. Thin‐layer techniques when applied to urine cytology were found to improve cell yield and cell preservation, and reduce background artefact. The reporting rate for abnormal urothelial cells was comparable to conventional cytospin smears, as was screening time. Laboratory staff found the methodologies to be practicable and easily incorporated into a large routine diagnostic service. We conclude that a one‐slide thin‐layer urine preparation is comparable to four cytospin slides in the detection of urothelial abnormalities, and that both ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™ have comparable features.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-5507</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2303</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00341.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11722510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>AutoCyte PREP ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques ; Community Health Services ; Cytodiagnosis - instrumentation ; Cytodiagnosis - methods ; cytology ; Humans ; thin-layer techniques ; ThinPrep ; Urinary Tract - pathology ; urinary tract specimens ; Urine - cytology ; Urologic Diseases - pathology ; Urologic Diseases - urine ; Urologic Neoplasms - pathology ; Urologic Neoplasms - urine</subject><ispartof>Cytopathology (Oxford), 2001-10, Vol.12 (5), p.306-313</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4681-c9ec0829f9c0ed9e6c6efa493293f04a7be78d902571b6b2c21f65ee4be233aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4681-c9ec0829f9c0ed9e6c6efa493293f04a7be78d902571b6b2c21f65ee4be233aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11722510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halford, J. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology</title><title>Cytopathology (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Cytopathology</addtitle><description>Evaluation of thin‐layer methods in urine cytology
Conventional cytospin smears prepared from urinary tract specimens were compared with two new thin layer techniques, i.e. ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™. Cellularity, cell preservation, background features, detection rate, screening time and ease of preparation were evaluated. Thin‐layer techniques when applied to urine cytology were found to improve cell yield and cell preservation, and reduce background artefact. The reporting rate for abnormal urothelial cells was comparable to conventional cytospin smears, as was screening time. Laboratory staff found the methodologies to be practicable and easily incorporated into a large routine diagnostic service. We conclude that a one‐slide thin‐layer urine preparation is comparable to four cytospin slides in the detection of urothelial abnormalities, and that both ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™ have comparable features.</description><subject>AutoCyte PREP</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</subject><subject>Community Health Services</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>cytology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>thin-layer techniques</subject><subject>ThinPrep</subject><subject>Urinary Tract - pathology</subject><subject>urinary tract specimens</subject><subject>Urine - cytology</subject><subject>Urologic Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Urologic Diseases - urine</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - urine</subject><issn>0956-5507</issn><issn>1365-2303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCygrdgl-xYklNqiUQlXBpgjBxnKcCU3JA-IEmr8nIVXZsrEt-Z47moOQQ7BHMBeXG48w4buUYeZRjImHMePE2x6g8f7jEI2x9IXr-zgYoRNrN12QSsqO0YiQgFKf4DGisy-dNbpOy8IpE6dep4Wb6RYqJ4d6XcbWSQunqdICHNPWZVa-tafoKNGZhbPdPUFPt7PV9M5dPs7vp9dL13AREtdIMDikMpEGQyxBGAGJ5pJRyRLMdRBBEMYSUz8gkYiooSQRPgCPgDKmNZugi6H3oyo_G7C1ylNrIMt0AWVjVdBtyUV3TlA4BE1VWltBoj6qNNdVqwhWvS-1Ub0W1WtRvS_160ttO_R8N6OJcoj_wJ2gLnA1BL7TDNp_F6vpy6p7dLg74KmtYbvHdfWuRMACXz0_zNVisbiRnE_VK_sBm7aHUw</recordid><startdate>200110</startdate><enddate>200110</enddate><creator>Wright, R. G.</creator><creator>Halford, J. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200110</creationdate><title>Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology</title><author>Wright, R. G. ; Halford, J. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4681-c9ec0829f9c0ed9e6c6efa493293f04a7be78d902571b6b2c21f65ee4be233aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>AutoCyte PREP</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</topic><topic>Community Health Services</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>cytology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>thin-layer techniques</topic><topic>ThinPrep</topic><topic>Urinary Tract - pathology</topic><topic>urinary tract specimens</topic><topic>Urine - cytology</topic><topic>Urologic Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Urologic Diseases - urine</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halford, J. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cytopathology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, R. G.</au><au>Halford, J. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology</atitle><jtitle>Cytopathology (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Cytopathology</addtitle><date>2001-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>306-313</pages><issn>0956-5507</issn><eissn>1365-2303</eissn><abstract>Evaluation of thin‐layer methods in urine cytology
Conventional cytospin smears prepared from urinary tract specimens were compared with two new thin layer techniques, i.e. ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™. Cellularity, cell preservation, background features, detection rate, screening time and ease of preparation were evaluated. Thin‐layer techniques when applied to urine cytology were found to improve cell yield and cell preservation, and reduce background artefact. The reporting rate for abnormal urothelial cells was comparable to conventional cytospin smears, as was screening time. Laboratory staff found the methodologies to be practicable and easily incorporated into a large routine diagnostic service. We conclude that a one‐slide thin‐layer urine preparation is comparable to four cytospin slides in the detection of urothelial abnormalities, and that both ThinPrep® and AutoCyte PREP™ have comparable features.</abstract><cop>Oxford UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11722510</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00341.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0956-5507 |
| ispartof | Cytopathology (Oxford), 2001-10, Vol.12 (5), p.306-313 |
| issn | 0956-5507 1365-2303 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72304672 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | AutoCyte PREP Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine Clinical Laboratory Techniques Community Health Services Cytodiagnosis - instrumentation Cytodiagnosis - methods cytology Humans thin-layer techniques ThinPrep Urinary Tract - pathology urinary tract specimens Urine - cytology Urologic Diseases - pathology Urologic Diseases - urine Urologic Neoplasms - pathology Urologic Neoplasms - urine |
| title | Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A29%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20thin-layer%20methods%20in%20urine%20cytology&rft.jtitle=Cytopathology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Wright,%20R.%20G.&rft.date=2001-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=306-313&rft.issn=0956-5507&rft.eissn=1365-2303&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00341.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72304672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4681-c9ec0829f9c0ed9e6c6efa493293f04a7be78d902571b6b2c21f65ee4be233aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72304672&rft_id=info:pmid/11722510&rfr_iscdi=true |