Loading…

Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ossicular chain prostheses

Hydroxyapatite (HA) middle ear prostheses have gained popularity as an alternative to human autografts and homografts. This study reports on 3 HA prostheses types: total ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes footplate to the tympanic membrane; partial ossicular chain prostheses, u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2000-10, Vol.123 (4), p.425-429
Main Authors: Pasha, Raza, Hill, Samuel L., Burgio, Don L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-6378011604fa6b2a62a2e9c21a77cae490be0b4179f563545f57e10d8475d7fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-6378011604fa6b2a62a2e9c21a77cae490be0b4179f563545f57e10d8475d7fd3
container_end_page 429
container_issue 4
container_start_page 425
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume 123
creator Pasha, Raza
Hill, Samuel L.
Burgio, Don L.
description Hydroxyapatite (HA) middle ear prostheses have gained popularity as an alternative to human autografts and homografts. This study reports on 3 HA prostheses types: total ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes footplate to the tympanic membrane; partial ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the tympanic membrane; and Kartush incus struts (Smith & Nephew Richards Inc), used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the undersurface of the malleus. This single-surgeon study of 33 consecutive cases revealed a statistically significant difference in mean postoperative air-bone gap and airbone gap closure between incus struts (14/26 dB) or partial (22/11 dB) or total (25/10 dB) ossicular chain prostheses ( t test: P < 0.05). Prognostic risk factors graded by the Middle Ear Risk Index indicate a tendency for worse postoperative hearing with increasing Middle Ear Risk Index. This study supports the use of HA ossicular prostheses and, in particular, the use of the malleus for ossicular chain construction. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:425-9.)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mhn.2000.109369
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72311510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1067_mhn.2000.109369</sage_id><els_id>S0194599800202775</els_id><sourcerecordid>72311510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-6378011604fa6b2a62a2e9c21a77cae490be0b4179f563545f57e10d8475d7fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EoqUws6FMTITaTmLHI1QtRaroArPlOC_EVZoUOynk3-MqlZiAyR86972rg9A1wfcEMz7dlvU9xfjwEhETJ2jsLzxkKeGnaIyJiMNEiHSELpzbeI4xzs_RiBBMMeFijPh8r6pOtaapg6YIyj63zVevdv6nhaBxzuiuUjbQpTJ1sLONa0tw4C7RWaEqB1fHc4LeFvPX2TJcrZ-eZw-rUMc0pSGLeIoJYTguFMuoYlRREJoSxblWEAucAc5iX6VIWJTESZFwIDhPY57kvMijCbod5vrVHx24Vm6N01BVqoamc5LTiJCEYA9OB1D7js5CIXfWbJXtJcHy4Ep6V_LgSg6ufOLmOLrLtpD_8Ec5HuAD8Gkq6P-bJ9fLl8cFTWNBffJuSDr1DnLTdLb2kv5oIgYcvMm9ASudNlBryI0F3cq8Mb9mvwGSyZXm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72311510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ossicular chain prostheses</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pasha, Raza ; Hill, Samuel L. ; Burgio, Don L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pasha, Raza ; Hill, Samuel L. ; Burgio, Don L.</creatorcontrib><description>Hydroxyapatite (HA) middle ear prostheses have gained popularity as an alternative to human autografts and homografts. This study reports on 3 HA prostheses types: total ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes footplate to the tympanic membrane; partial ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the tympanic membrane; and Kartush incus struts (Smith &amp; Nephew Richards Inc), used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the undersurface of the malleus. This single-surgeon study of 33 consecutive cases revealed a statistically significant difference in mean postoperative air-bone gap and airbone gap closure between incus struts (14/26 dB) or partial (22/11 dB) or total (25/10 dB) ossicular chain prostheses ( t test: P &lt; 0.05). Prognostic risk factors graded by the Middle Ear Risk Index indicate a tendency for worse postoperative hearing with increasing Middle Ear Risk Index. This study supports the use of HA ossicular prostheses and, in particular, the use of the malleus for ossicular chain construction. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:425-9.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.109369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11020179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry ; Biocompatible Materials ; Durapatite ; Ear Ossicles - physiopathology ; Ear Ossicles - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ossicular Prosthesis ; Ossicular Replacement - methods ; Prognosis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2000-10, Vol.123 (4), p.425-429</ispartof><rights>2000 American Academy of Otolarynology - Head and Neck Surgery foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>2000 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-6378011604fa6b2a62a2e9c21a77cae490be0b4179f563545f57e10d8475d7fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-6378011604fa6b2a62a2e9c21a77cae490be0b4179f563545f57e10d8475d7fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11020179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pasha, Raza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Samuel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgio, Don L.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ossicular chain prostheses</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Hydroxyapatite (HA) middle ear prostheses have gained popularity as an alternative to human autografts and homografts. This study reports on 3 HA prostheses types: total ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes footplate to the tympanic membrane; partial ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the tympanic membrane; and Kartush incus struts (Smith &amp; Nephew Richards Inc), used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the undersurface of the malleus. This single-surgeon study of 33 consecutive cases revealed a statistically significant difference in mean postoperative air-bone gap and airbone gap closure between incus struts (14/26 dB) or partial (22/11 dB) or total (25/10 dB) ossicular chain prostheses ( t test: P &lt; 0.05). Prognostic risk factors graded by the Middle Ear Risk Index indicate a tendency for worse postoperative hearing with increasing Middle Ear Risk Index. This study supports the use of HA ossicular prostheses and, in particular, the use of the malleus for ossicular chain construction. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:425-9.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Durapatite</subject><subject>Ear Ossicles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ear Ossicles - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ossicular Prosthesis</subject><subject>Ossicular Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EoqUws6FMTITaTmLHI1QtRaroArPlOC_EVZoUOynk3-MqlZiAyR86972rg9A1wfcEMz7dlvU9xfjwEhETJ2jsLzxkKeGnaIyJiMNEiHSELpzbeI4xzs_RiBBMMeFijPh8r6pOtaapg6YIyj63zVevdv6nhaBxzuiuUjbQpTJ1sLONa0tw4C7RWaEqB1fHc4LeFvPX2TJcrZ-eZw-rUMc0pSGLeIoJYTguFMuoYlRREJoSxblWEAucAc5iX6VIWJTESZFwIDhPY57kvMijCbod5vrVHx24Vm6N01BVqoamc5LTiJCEYA9OB1D7js5CIXfWbJXtJcHy4Ep6V_LgSg6ufOLmOLrLtpD_8Ec5HuAD8Gkq6P-bJ9fLl8cFTWNBffJuSDr1DnLTdLb2kv5oIgYcvMm9ASudNlBryI0F3cq8Mb9mvwGSyZXm</recordid><startdate>200010</startdate><enddate>200010</enddate><creator>Pasha, Raza</creator><creator>Hill, Samuel L.</creator><creator>Burgio, Don L.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200010</creationdate><title>Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ossicular chain prostheses</title><author>Pasha, Raza ; Hill, Samuel L. ; Burgio, Don L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-6378011604fa6b2a62a2e9c21a77cae490be0b4179f563545f57e10d8475d7fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Durapatite</topic><topic>Ear Ossicles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ear Ossicles - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ossicular Prosthesis</topic><topic>Ossicular Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pasha, Raza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Samuel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgio, Don L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pasha, Raza</au><au>Hill, Samuel L.</au><au>Burgio, Don L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ossicular chain prostheses</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2000-10</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>425-429</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Hydroxyapatite (HA) middle ear prostheses have gained popularity as an alternative to human autografts and homografts. This study reports on 3 HA prostheses types: total ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes footplate to the tympanic membrane; partial ossicular chain prostheses, used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the tympanic membrane; and Kartush incus struts (Smith &amp; Nephew Richards Inc), used for grafting the stapes superstructure to the undersurface of the malleus. This single-surgeon study of 33 consecutive cases revealed a statistically significant difference in mean postoperative air-bone gap and airbone gap closure between incus struts (14/26 dB) or partial (22/11 dB) or total (25/10 dB) ossicular chain prostheses ( t test: P &lt; 0.05). Prognostic risk factors graded by the Middle Ear Risk Index indicate a tendency for worse postoperative hearing with increasing Middle Ear Risk Index. This study supports the use of HA ossicular prostheses and, in particular, the use of the malleus for ossicular chain construction. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:425-9.)</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11020179</pmid><doi>10.1067/mhn.2000.109369</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2000-10, Vol.123 (4), p.425-429
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72311510
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Audiometry
Biocompatible Materials
Durapatite
Ear Ossicles - physiopathology
Ear Ossicles - surgery
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Ossicular Prosthesis
Ossicular Replacement - methods
Prognosis
Treatment Outcome
title Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ossicular chain prostheses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A58%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20hydroxyapatite%20ossicular%20chain%20prostheses&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Pasha,%20Raza&rft.date=2000-10&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=425-429&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mhn.2000.109369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72311510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-6378011604fa6b2a62a2e9c21a77cae490be0b4179f563545f57e10d8475d7fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72311510&rft_id=info:pmid/11020179&rft_sage_id=10.1067_mhn.2000.109369&rfr_iscdi=true