Neonatal management at limits of viability: hypothesis based on review of literature and clinical observations

Advances in the surfactant era have resulted in a dramatic rise in the survival of 23–26 week old neonates. For the group as a whole, survival is 50% with a 50% morbidity in survivors. Current literature includes a few ‘small baby protocols’ suggesting guidelines for management based on institutiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical hypotheses 2000-07, Vol.55 (1), p.47-50
Main Authors: Daftary, A.S., Tuladhar, R., Patole, S.K., Whitehall, J.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Pressure
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Gestational Age
Guidelines as Topic
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Infant Care
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Intensive Care, Neonatal
Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring
Medical sciences
Water-Electrolyte Balance
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Advances in the surfactant era have resulted in a dramatic rise in the survival of 23–26 week old neonates. For the group as a whole, survival is 50% with a 50% morbidity in survivors. Current literature includes a few ‘small baby protocols’ suggesting guidelines for management based on institutional experiences. Adopting these with or without any modifications may not be appropriate for other institutions due to the diversity of the patient population involved and the available resources. A review of literature on ELBW neonates reveals an interesting fact that almost all the management strategies and optimal goals in the most critical first few weeks of life involve two numbers – ‘fifty’ and ‘eight’! The relevance of these two numbers (or their multiples) in simplifying the management of ELBW neonates is highlighted. @ 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd
ISSN:0306-9877
1532-2777
DOI:10.1054/mehy.1999.1002