Loading…
Should the definition of preeclampsia include a rise in diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mm Hg to a level <90 mm Hg in association with proteinuria?
Objective: This study was undertaken to compare baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes between normotensive women who did and those who did not have a rise in diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria. Study Design: We studied 4302 healthy nulliparous women from...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2000-10, Vol.183 (4), p.787-792 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective: This study was undertaken to compare baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes between normotensive women who did and those who did not have a rise in diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria.
Study Design: We studied 4302 healthy nulliparous women from the Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention trial who were delivered at ≥20 weeks’ gestation. We selected as the study group normotensive women who developed proteinuria within 7 days of a rise in diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mm Hg with respect to baseline on 2 occasions 4 to 168 hours apart. Baseline blood pressure was the mean of measurements at 2 clinic visits before 22 weeks’ gestation. Other normotensive women used for comparison were those who did not develop gestational hypertension or a rise in diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria.
Results: Except for greater weight (
P < .001), body mass index (
P < .001), and systolic blood pressure (
P = .05) the baseline characteristics of the 82 women with a rise in diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria did not differ significantly from those of the other normotensive women. Although they had a greater rate of weight gain (
P < .005), larger babies (
P = .06), and a 2-fold increase in abdominal delivery (
P < .001), there was little other evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among these women.
Conclusion: During normotensive pregnancy a rise in diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria appears to be benign and is not a useful clinical construct. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:787-92.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1067/mob.2000.108865 |