Groin hernia repair in Scotland

• Published in: British journal of surgery 2000-12, Vol.87 (12), p.1722-1726
• Main Authors: Hair, A., Duffy, K., McLean, J., Taylor, S., Smith, H., Walker, A., Macintyre, I. M. C., O'Dwyer, P. J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen; Aged; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Biological and medical sciences; Female; Hernia, Inguinal - epidemiology; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery; Humans; Laparoscopy - methods; Length of Stay; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Scotland - epidemiology; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Surgery of the digestive system; Surgical Mesh; Venous Thrombosis - prevention & control
• ISSN: 0007-1323; 1365-2168
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01598.x

Background The use of mesh for groin hernia repair has dramatically changed the way this common operation is performed. The aim of this study was to survey the methods of groin hernia repair in Scotland and to assess patient satisfaction with the operation. Methods Between 1 April 1998 and 31 March 1999 all patients who underwent groin hernia repair in the National Health Service in Scotland were identified. As well as looking at the type of hernia repair performed and postoperative morbidity, patients were sent a Short Form‐36 about 3 months after the operation to assess satisfaction and return to normal activity. Results Information was obtained on 5506 (97 per cent) of patients who underwent groin hernia repair during the study period. Eighty‐five per cent of patients had an open mesh repair and 4 per cent had a laparoscopic repair. Most operations (85 per cent) were performed using general anaesthesia on an inpatient basis (78 per cent), and 8 per cent were for repair of a recurrent hernia. Potentially serious intraoperative complications were rare (seven patients), although they were significantly (P < 0·001) more likely to be associated with a laparoscopic approach or repair of a femoral hernia: relative risk compared with open inguinal hernia repair 33 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 6–197) and 22 (95 per cent c.i. 3–152) respectively. Wound complications were common and 10 per cent of patients required a district nurse to attend the wound. Patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction; 94 per cent would recommend the same operation to someone else if required. Conclusion An open mesh repair using general anaesthesia has become the repair of choice for a groin hernia in Scotland. Despite a high incidence of wound complications, patients are satisfied with this operation. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd